International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a research the best information you must find, is the SLEPT analysis. Using this analysis, you are able to know more about the Social, Legal, Economic, Politics and the Technology

Authors Avatar

Unit 21     “International Trade”

Introduction

International trade is becoming more and more important for certain businesses.

Those companies need to find out about which country they can sell their goods or services.  This is quite important for every business, if they want to do a foreign trade.

Further you’ll find why different theories are a benefit for international trade. About the non-European country and the business ‘Gemos Flowers’. There are various classifications of businesses that are involved in selling their goods abroad. They might do this by exporting to one or more specific customers, by creating sales without operations or by adopting a more structured multi-national approach.

Before a business wants trade in another country, he or she first has to do some research to find out whether the country is profitable or not.

In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a research the best information you must find, is the SLEPT analysis. Using this analysis, you are able to know more about the Social, Legal, Economic, Politics and the Technology in Canada.

Enjoy reading this report!

Name:   Denise Chan

Class:   2IBS1

Cohort:   2004 – 2008


E1. A detailed explanation of how international trade leads to the benefits and costs identified using relevant theories

Theory of David Ricardo

David Ricardo was born in 1772 at London, England. He was a British political economist and one of the most influential of the classical economist. He was also a successful businessman, financier and speculator, and he was quite rich.

Ricardo developed two key theories that are still important in the economic courses today. Those are:

  • Distribution theory
  • International trade theory (comparative advantage)

Distribution theory

With his partner Malthus, Ricardo was very concerned about the impact that increased populations would have on the economy. He argued that when more people and more land would have to be cultivated. However, the return from this land wouldn’t be constant the same. In fact the land would suffer from decreased returns. When you buy extra land it would become more and more profitable and it attract a further capital.

The allocation of each factor of production to each area of economic activity would be determined by the level of economic rent, which could be earned. When the returns are decreasing, the capital would shift to more profitable activities.  

International trade theory

The international trade theory, also named as the comparative advantage, is focused on comparative costs and how a country could make profit when it had lower costs. The original example was the trade in wine and cloth between England and Portugal. Ricardo showed that one country produces a product for lower costs than the other country, so they should specialize in that product. And that other country would specialize in the other product, and the two countries could then trade.

The benefits of international trade are that both countries are distributional and they can improve their income. The changes on income are always a benefit, because foreign trade doesn’t affect value. If every country specializes where they had a comparative advantage, then the level of world’s welfare should increase.

Ricardo realized that an advantage was a limited case of a more general theory. You can see that in table 1 (next page) that actually Portugal can produce both products cheaper than England. Ricardo saw that it could still be a benefit for both countries to specialize and trade.

Table 1 :

Table 1 show that England costs for wine is twice as much as the wine in Portugal. And when you look at the costs for the cloths from both countries, then you see that England produce 1, 5 more than Portugal. Because comparative costs are different, it will still be an advantage for both countries to trade. Even though Portugal has an advantage in both products. So wouldn’t it be better to let Portugal produce both products? No, both countries have an amount of different production factors. But the needs are in both countries unrestricted. And further if England doesn’t produce anything, then they got nothing to trade.

Portugal is relatively better at producing wine than cloth. At this point we call that Portugal have a comparative advantage in the production of wine. England is relatively better at producing cloth than wine, so England have a comparative advantage in the production of cloth.

Table 2:

In table 2 shows how trade might be an advantage. England needs 270 hours to be available for the production. Before the trade takes place, it produces and consumes 8 units of cloth and 5 units of wine. Portugal has fewer labor resources and with 180 hours they are available for production. Before trade it produces and consumes 9 units of cloth and 6 units of wine. Total production between the two countries is 17 units of cloth and 11 units of wine. After the trade, Portugal only produce wine and England cloth, the total production is 18 units of cloth (270 ÷ 15 =) and 12 units of wine (180 ÷ 15 =).

Conclusion:

The productions have increased with 1 unit of each product, cloth and wine. The theory of comparative advantage shows a number of important assumptions:

  • Costs are constant and no economies of scale are involved
  • There are no transport costs
  • No tariffs or other trade barriers
  • The theory also says that the traded goods are identical
  • Buyers and sellers know where the cheapest internationally  goods can be found

Using this theory, international trade allows both countries to enjoy more of the both goods. Countries rather do this, then produce only for domestic consumption and don’t trade. Ricardo also mentioned that when a company finds an competitive business, of course they will try to block each other before they access the trade world.

Theory of Adam Smith

Adam Smith is often seen as the father of the economic. He developed a lot of theories about markets, that we still use it, as a standard theory. He was born in 1723 in a place called Kirkcaldy, Fife, Scotland. Adam Smith was a Scottish political, economist and philosopher; he became famous for his influential book “The Wealth of Nations” written in 1776.

The Wealth of Nations (it was actually called ‘An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations’) was his main work. He wrote five books about that subject. The books are all about the division of labor (specialization) and their needs, and about the workings of the market mechanism (the price system).

Mr. Smith argued that the markets would guide economic activities and act like invisible hand (with this he means the operations of market forces) allocating resources. Like the prices. Prices would rise when there is for example a shortage of some products, like grain. Or the prices could fall, like when the demand of that product is low.

Markets forces ensured the production of the right goods and services. This is because, like every other businesses, the producers would like to make profits by providing them. Without the government intervention, public well-being would increase from competition when they organizing products to suit the public.

With competition both businesses need to compete each other, this would be lowering their prices to their lowest possible levels or increase their products (quality) etc. If there wasn’t enough competition, this would mean that producers would make more profits. But this will attract other companies to join the industries. All of this, it is a benefit for the consumer.

With this system it has two requirements. One was that the marker needed to be free of government intervention, and the other was that there had to be a competition. Smith recognized the danger of monopoly:

“A monopoly is either to an individual or to a trading company. The monopolists keep the market constantly under-stocked. They do this by never fully supplying the effectual demand, sell their commodities (much more above their natural price) and raise their emoluments (consist of wages or profit) above their natural rate.”

It is quite clear why Smith says that the moral norms are necessary for a system to work. People must have a good access to information about the products and services available, and the rule of law must hold.

Here is a  famous and oft-quoted passage of ‘the Wealth of Nations’:

* “He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”

About the ‘Invisible Hand’

The ‘invisible hand’ is a frequently theme from the book, ‘Wealth of Nations’. The idea behind the invisible hand is, on one level, which people benefits the community around them. They do this by simply acting in their own self-interest, without conscious regard to the community service. In other words, self-interest equates general interest.

The invisible hand is mostly involved with the free market. The free market is about the possible freedom for the buyers and sellers to exchange their goods, which will leads to an increased economic growth. Adam Smith assumed that consumers choose the lowest price for their products and entrepreneurs choose the highest rate of profit. By an insufficient demand (through market prices), consumers will ‘direct’ the entrepreneurs investment money to the most profitable industry.

Join now!

A positive market-based economy aspect is that it forces people to think about what other people want. Smith saw that this was a good part about the invisible hand mechanism. He identified two ways to obtain the help and cooperation of other people. First is to appeal to the benevolence and goodwill of others. And the second way is to appeal instead to other people’s self-interest.

A quote about the ‘invisible hand’:

"Every individual necessarily labors to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally indeed neither intends to promote the public ...

This is a preview of the whole essay