• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is globalization actually good for Dhaka, Bangladesh?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is globalization actually good for Dhaka, Bangladesh? This question can be answered by using many diverse approaches. Some may believe that of course globalization has only positive impacts on developing countries around the world. Nevertheless, others may dispute that globalization brings only negative social, political, cultural, economic and environmental outcomes. In order for us to establish our own point of view on the issues of globalization in Dhaka, Bangladesh we are obliged to take a look at few things, for instance definition of globalization, and its both positive and negative impacts on the capital city, Dhaka. Dhaka, formerly known as Dacca, is the capital and major city of Bangladesh with the estimated population of 130 million people. It is located in the geographic center of the country, and is one of the world's top rice and jute growing regions. Its industries include textile and food processing, particularly rice milling, and a range of other consumer goods are also manufactured here. The Muslim influence is revealed in the more than 700 mosques and historic buildings found throughout the city. ...read more.

Middle

Foreign investment creates 10,000 new jobs every year in Bangladesh, which results in an increase of living standards. Conversely, foreign investments create high paying jobs, which require additional knowledge and skills, hence motivating people to achieve higher education, in order, to increasing their income. Advertisements for foreign produces also encourage people in Dhaka because when individuals watch commercials for high-priced foreign products, they want to buy them even if they don't have enough money. Dhaka, Bangladesh has largely benefited from the transfer of technology, which resulted from foreign investments. For example, a telephone company that had been monopolizing mobile telecommunication services since 1992 was diminished by the global movement. At that time only a few people were able to use it, for it was incredibly expensive and their services were below average. They also provided very few jobs in that sector. When some other foreign companies entered market of Bangladesh, the monopolist company lost its power. Now the competitive activity of many telephone companies has increased competition, people's income levels, and employment opportunities, which in turn has substantially reduced poverty. ...read more.

Conclusion

Beximco is a sweatshop, where human rights are systematically violated. Wal-Mart and its contractor pay no taxes to sew their garments in the Dhaka. All that they leave behind is the illegal 20-cent an hour wages and some small rent and fees. In 1998, total government revenues in Bangladesh were around $3.9 billion, a sum far too low to even provide the most basic services to the over 130 million people in the country. On the other hand, Wal-Mart's sales in 1998 amounted to $137.6 billion, which means that Wal-Mart's annual sales are 36 times greater than the total revenues of the Bangladeshi government. Yet Wal-Mart does not pay a single cent in taxes or tariffs. Unfortunately, Bangladesh, one of the poorest nations in the world, is being forced to subsidize Wal-Mart. Due to inadequate tax base and overall low government revenues, Bangladesh must rely upon foreign aid to meet more than one-half of its entire development budgets. In 1998, Bangladesh exported 732 million garments to the U.S., making Bangladesh the 5th largest exporter worldwide of apparel to the United States. 5 1 About Dhaka. <http://www.buet.ac.bd/mme/sppm/about_dhaka.htm> 2 <http://canadianeconomy.gc.ca/english/economy/globalization.html> 3 < http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-11045-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html> 4 <http://www.bangladeshobserveronline.com/new/2004/07/13/economic.htm> 5 <http://www.1worldcommunication.org/Walmart.htm#u.s.> ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    This trade and investment is raising living standards in some countries faster than many thought possible. For instance, living standards now double every ten years in China. The Pew Global Attitude Survey5 indicated that citizens in the developing world have a more positive attitude towards globalisation than people generally believe.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    For many cultures the new diversity that globalization brings is disquieting and disempowering. People fear that their countries are becoming fragmented and that traditional values and cultural identities are being lost. There are many driving forces which help spread Americanization but the main contributing factors are the huge multi national corporations.

  1. Globalisation of Wal Mart

    In 1970's, the company had a total of 38 stores making $44.2 million in sales. Thus outlining expansion has always been a part of the Wal-mart ethos and its continued through the 1980's, 1990's and 2000's (entering local stores like Minnesota to countries like United Kingdom).

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    As Mike Finger points out, there are real and substantial costs involved in implementing these trade procedures domestically - much more so than is the case with the removal of tariffs and quotas at the border.93 This "implementation agenda" has risen to the top of the WTO priority list in

  1. Globalisation of GAP

    There is a greater chance of success in the foreign market and the risk is reduced for the company. From the research I have done I have not found any evidence of Gap entering into joint ventures, this could be due to the following negatives of the concept, firstly having to work with another business could be problematic.

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    It appears that the public are still of the opinion that nations, and nations alone, can provide a forum for the political expression of the popular desire. So one can conclude that in a more integrated world, nation-states may even become more important.

  1. Does globalization inherently increase inequality or can it be made to work for the ...

    the globalizing group has accelerated steadily from one percent in the 1960s to five percent in the 1990s whilst "non-globalizers" only accelerated one per cent. Economists largely agree that openness toward foreign trade and investment explains the growth of those actively trying to globalize (cited in Held et al, 2003, 447).

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    The end result of this process ought to be lower prices for better quality goods as the market becomes more streamlined. Coupled with this point is the supposed increase in technology that operating in a global market ought to lead to.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work