• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Globalization bad for the third world?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction to International Relations Is Globalization bad for the third world? 04069458 Word Count: 1493 Globalization is defined as the increasing interdependence, integration and interaction between people and corporations in different locations around the globe. In political terms it can be defined as the spread of political sphere of interests to regions and countries outside the area of the political actors. (Wikipedia 2006) The term 'Third world' is a lot more vague, it comes from the cold war when the third world was taken to be the area outside either of the two opposing camps. Now, however, the meaning of the term has changed and has come to represent the Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDC's) of the world, but even this is not a fully accurate term. There is a huge difference between a Sub-Saharan state (for example Ethiopia) and a South East Asian state (for example Thailand) yet they would both be classed as LEDC's, therefore it is very hard to determine if globalization is good or bad for the third world in general. To form a fair critic of globalization it is important to look at the positive as well as the negative affects, and globalization has had many major benefits for the third world. ...read more.

Middle

(Przeworski 2000) In principle there are no major problems with situation, it is when something goes wrong however that the problems occur. One of the main reasons why globalization has not affected the third world in nearly such a positive way as many economic speculators predicted is due to the way that the IMF lends them money. When investing the IMF adds clauses that state that if the something goes wrong for the western investors they can bail out and are even sometimes given compensation money for the losses that occurred. Although on the surface this may sound positive as it encourages more investors to take on what more risky ventures in less economically stable third world countries it in-fact negative as it leads to speculation and means investors often pull out of a country at the first sign of weakness. (Przeworski 2000) This in terrible for the county that has been invested in because, as they have got rid of all protectionist measures and trade barriers there is nothing to stabilize the economy and so it collapses. The end result of this supposed 'help' then end up being a situation where the economy can never recover as the loan repayments to the IMF are to large and so living conditions remain very poor. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Miguel Lacabana 2003) Now some South American nations, notably Venezuela have moved towards a more socialist democracy and have stopped embracing American aid and investment, instead moving towards a more self-sufficient economic model. Although rising oil prices may caused it, this policy has really worked in Venezuela where standards of living have increased dramatically since the liberal president Hugo Chaves came into power in 1998. It is interesting to note that none of the large nations that are now promoting globalization became powerful through free trade and open markets. In-fact the US, Britain and the other European states became the economic powers they are today through policies of high tariffs, low imports and large exports, not the free trade model they are now promoting. Overall, I personally believe that globalization is inevitable, necessary, and has the potential to be really good for the third world, and increase prosperity globally. The way it is being delivered at the moment however leaves a lot to be desired. Until the powerful organization such as the WTO and the IMF totally reform the methods they use to try and help the third world, globalization is going to be more a hinderence than a blessing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    Europe would have been a lot poorer, had it resisted the globalisation of mathematics, science and technology at that time. The same would apply to the developing countries of today.

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    Despite the fact that anti-globalists are in the minority, ignore them at your peril. The massive anti-WTO protests in Seattle, USA in 1999 is testament to this fact. Full-scale protests and mass arrests continued for days on that occasion, culminating in 600 arrests and an estimated US$3 million in property damage.

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    Country Brief. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/AFRICAEXT/SOMALIAEXTN/0,,menuPK:367675~pagePK:141132~piPK:141107~theSitePK:367665,00.html 6 Tutor2u. (2006). AS Macroeconomics. Available: http://tutor2u.net/economics/revision-notes/as-macro-economic-growth.html 7 BBC. (2011). What is GDP?. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13200758 8 Jeffrey D. Sachs and Andrew M. Warner. (1997). Sources of Slow Growth in African Economies. Available: http://www.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/warner_files/afrgrow.pdf 9 Central Intelligence Agency. (2011). Africa: Somalia. Available: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/so.html 10 World Bank.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    Industrial expansion in the less economically developed world has spawned some very large companies. For example, industrial growth in South Korea was achieved largely through activities of major companies such as, Samsung and LG.

  1. Are recessions inevitable?

    This sequence is known as the 'Paradox of Thrift'6. Another explanation is the monetarist view that fluctuations in economic activity arise because of changes in the money supply. Alternatively, political cycles based around elections can have an impact. But beyond the Keynesian reason, real shocks are vitally influential as well.

  2. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    As newer technology invariably meant greater expense, it was not easy or perhaps 'rational' for a company to invest in newer machinery. It was also very difficult to accomplish as it would involve large-scale co-operation between a lot of individual firms, where distrust and jealousy between industries were clearly prevalent.35

  1. Growth is the most powerful weapon in the fight for higher living standards - ...

    Macro economic stability, the efficient allocation of resources and integration into a global economy increase the rates of return on capital and labour and attract investment enabling higher economic growth. Good governance and legal stability underpin the effectiveness these three strategies.

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    are gaining a comparative advantage in manufacturing industries, as they take advantage of the increased technology mentioned above. As these countries have large supplies of low skilled labour their wage rates are lower and so they can produce the goods cheaper.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work