• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Globalization bad for the third world?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction to International Relations Is Globalization bad for the third world? 04069458 Word Count: 1493 Globalization is defined as the increasing interdependence, integration and interaction between people and corporations in different locations around the globe. In political terms it can be defined as the spread of political sphere of interests to regions and countries outside the area of the political actors. (Wikipedia 2006) The term 'Third world' is a lot more vague, it comes from the cold war when the third world was taken to be the area outside either of the two opposing camps. Now, however, the meaning of the term has changed and has come to represent the Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDC's) of the world, but even this is not a fully accurate term. There is a huge difference between a Sub-Saharan state (for example Ethiopia) and a South East Asian state (for example Thailand) yet they would both be classed as LEDC's, therefore it is very hard to determine if globalization is good or bad for the third world in general. To form a fair critic of globalization it is important to look at the positive as well as the negative affects, and globalization has had many major benefits for the third world. ...read more.

Middle

(Przeworski 2000) In principle there are no major problems with situation, it is when something goes wrong however that the problems occur. One of the main reasons why globalization has not affected the third world in nearly such a positive way as many economic speculators predicted is due to the way that the IMF lends them money. When investing the IMF adds clauses that state that if the something goes wrong for the western investors they can bail out and are even sometimes given compensation money for the losses that occurred. Although on the surface this may sound positive as it encourages more investors to take on what more risky ventures in less economically stable third world countries it in-fact negative as it leads to speculation and means investors often pull out of a country at the first sign of weakness. (Przeworski 2000) This in terrible for the county that has been invested in because, as they have got rid of all protectionist measures and trade barriers there is nothing to stabilize the economy and so it collapses. The end result of this supposed 'help' then end up being a situation where the economy can never recover as the loan repayments to the IMF are to large and so living conditions remain very poor. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Miguel Lacabana 2003) Now some South American nations, notably Venezuela have moved towards a more socialist democracy and have stopped embracing American aid and investment, instead moving towards a more self-sufficient economic model. Although rising oil prices may caused it, this policy has really worked in Venezuela where standards of living have increased dramatically since the liberal president Hugo Chaves came into power in 1998. It is interesting to note that none of the large nations that are now promoting globalization became powerful through free trade and open markets. In-fact the US, Britain and the other European states became the economic powers they are today through policies of high tariffs, low imports and large exports, not the free trade model they are now promoting. Overall, I personally believe that globalization is inevitable, necessary, and has the potential to be really good for the third world, and increase prosperity globally. The way it is being delivered at the moment however leaves a lot to be desired. Until the powerful organization such as the WTO and the IMF totally reform the methods they use to try and help the third world, globalization is going to be more a hinderence than a blessing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    What's more, views of globalisation are distinctly more positive in low-income countries than in rich ones. Indeed, the fast-growing economies in the world in this era of globalisation are developing countries that are aggressively integrating with the world economy. In general, those countries that have increased their participation in trade and attracted foreign investment have accelerated growth and reduced poverty.

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    Sceptics argue that globalization paralyses governmental efforts to subject worldwide economic forces to regulation and control. A seismic shift in the global economy has occurred, resulting in the 100 largest economies in the world today consisting of only 49 states while the remaining 51 economies are transnational corporations. (www.civiced.org)

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    Blackwell Publishing. 14 Giles Bolton (2007). Poor Story. Edbury Publishing. 15 Giles Bolton (2007). Poor Story. Edbury Publishing 16 World Bank. (2009). Country Brief. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/AFRICAEXT/SOMALIAEXTN/0,,menuPK:367675~pagePK:141132~piPK:141107~theSitePK:367665,00.html 17 United Nations Development Programme. (2011). Somalia. Available: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/SOM.html 18 RAND. (1993). How do education and training effect a countries economic performance?.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    A world economy powered by these forces is one of "incessant and manifold change", as Tumlir puts it, and its progress depends on the "anticipation of change" and the "rapidity of adjustment". However, it would be folly to think that natural liberty and a world price system are free-standing: they

  1. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    Industrial expansion in the less economically developed world has spawned some very large companies. For example, industrial growth in South Korea was achieved largely through activities of major companies such as, Samsung and LG.

  2. Growth is the most powerful weapon in the fight for higher living standards - ...

    Inadequate legal systems also deter private investment if governments fail to enforce contracts and property rights. Macroeconomic stability. Macroeconomic stability improves the environment for investment and signals to the domestic private sector and foreign investors that the government is committed to maintaining a well managed economy.

  1. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    it was only a matter of time till Britain was caught up. Countries who started the industrial race after Britain had the advantage of being able to invest in the most modern and efficient equipment, while many British firms had to make do with out-dated industrial plant.

  2. Given the fact that Third World countries are underdeveloped (or developing); the causes that ...

    claim, they will still face underdevelopment as a result of " direct and indirect economic control of their First world and domestic opressors."7 A second stream of thought of the international dependence theory is the false paradigm model. This model places the underdevelopment of third world countries as a result

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work