• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the United Nations a success or failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IS THE UN A SUCCESS OR FAILURE? The UN was established in 1945. The United Nations was set-up to take over The League of Nations, an organisation also conceived during similar circumstances during the First World War. The League of Nations (LON) in 1919 was brought about under the Treaty of Versailles "to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security." The UN adopted a similar idea, to ensure World Peace, and to establish the economic, social and political foundations. The UN has fifteen member states. Five of them are; Great Britain (GB), China (CH), United States (US), France (FR) and Russia (RIA). These five have permanent membership and have the right to Veto. (Which the French and Russians are threatening to use at the moment, concerning the attack on Iraq). The UN is multipurpose organisation boasting six principle organs. They are; Security Council (SC), General Assembly (GA), Secretariat (SEC), Economic and Social Council (ESC), Trusteeship (TRU), and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The SC, and GA are looked upon as the most important organs of the UN. The ICJ tends to be an organ that is publicised frequently as a key failure of the UN. But how much of a failure is the UN? The UN has had success with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) ...read more.

Middle

The UN has been described as failure in a number of ways. The ICJ has a dreadful record. It averages two to three cases per year. It's heard only sixty- four contentious cases between states, passing judgement on under half, and issuing nineteen Advisory Opinions. Infact many of the contentious cases were not of any great international importance! Therefore it has been claimed to be unable to fulfil its role to sufficient standard. For example, within the ICJ's first year it had a case to sort out. 1946 GB vs. Albania. GB ships were damaged and lives were lost, as Albania had apparently mined the Corfu Channel. GB took the issue to the SC, which declared it a legal issue to be viewed by the ICJ. Albania consequently refused to accept the judgement and pay damages. SO it quickly became apparent that there was no value in raising major disputes before the court, because if they cannot cope with a minor country like Albania, then how will they deal with a bigger issue/country. Even now countries do not even bother with the ICJ and most see it as a shambles. But in 1969, miraculously the ICJ did have a little bit of success. West Germany vs. Denmark vs. Netherlands. New principles had to be laid down the dividing up of the continental self beneath the sea. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alternatively with the imminent conflict in Iraq, 100-000 of troops have been sent to the Gulf in very short space of time. This has happened even with Member States expressing their views against this. The UN lacks the resources for mounting and managing big operations. Without troops of it's own, and only a minimal headquarters staff. During the Kosovo crisis 1999, UN showed their incompetence in resolving the situation. Ultimately NATO had to enter the equation and resolve the problem itself. In conclusion, The UN can be described as a success or failure, depending on what organisation we compare it to. In terms of the LON, the UN could be claimed to be a success, as firstly it has arguably been functioning for more than half a centaury. Which some claim is not very long for a world organisation, but it's a longer period than the LON. Compared to NATO, it could be claimed to be a failure, as NATO has had to resolve situations that the UN has been unable to. I.e.-Kosovo, '99. But the UN is a multipurpose organisation, and has many more roles then NATO. Also in terms of IMF, WB, WHO and UNESCO it claim to be a success, but the appalling record of the ICJ, UNCS and Peacekeeping, it could be described as a failure. David Jacobs 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Comprehensive Anatomy of China

    The 1982 constitution specifically addresses citizen's obligations and rights and it defines the parameters of the government structure. The 1982 State Constitution pronounces that "citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession, and of demonstration."

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    No real progress has been made so far, despite a tight deadline of end March 2003 to establish modalities and formulas for actual tariff-cutting negotiations. c) Rule-making Market access negotiations are not enough: they need to be buttressed by improvements to the WTO rule base.

  1. Flower Industry in Netherlands

    In addition, warehousing, pick and pack, transportation, and other major logistics enterprises can provide many other value added services, such as tax handling, re-labeling, invoicing and repairs, and the most crucial service to flowers, a cold storage on board. * Research institutes Basically, basic science is critical to keep plant genetics and biotechnology innovative.

  2. Islamic terrorism is a serious problem for the United States because of the threat ...

    By secretly funding terrorist organization, the patron state avoids the possibility of defeat and does not appear to be the aggressor. Modern technology has now made terrorism an efficient, convenient, and general discrete weapon for attacking state interests in the international realm.

  1. Colonialism and Colonies.

    When Britain saw its investments in and its control of the canal in jeopardy, it occupied Egypt to control the situation. Some European colonizing powers justified their colonial activities on what they called humanitarian motives. In the 19th century, Britain cited the African slave trade as a reason to increase its control over areas in Africa.

  2. Why was slavey abolished in the 19th century?

    This was something that would decrease the chance of abolition. In economic terms though, revolution had the opposite effect for the planters as the cost feeding, shipping and securing the slaves would go on to increase, lessening the chance of slave owners wanting to keep them.

  1. The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    By that way it precludes the exposure of merchant ships to a mass of differing and possibly inconsistent regulations as they sail around the world. Such obstructions and inconsistency can substantially increase the cost of moving goods in international trade and interrupt the movement of resources necessary to modern

  2. Porters Five Forces

    When competitors in your industry are threatened, does it turn into a blood-bath or do all firms follow acceptable practices? An aggressive rivalry can create several problems, especially if you are - a new business wanting to enter the market - attempting to cut prices - attempting to ?shake-up? the industry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work