• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Liverpool's slave trade was the centre of a global commerce and an important factor in British economic growth." To what extent would you agree with this opinion?

Extracts from this document...


Part B -"Liverpool's slave trade was the centre of a global commerce and an important factor in British economic growth." To what extent would you agree with this opinion? This essay will attempt to answer the question by approaching it in three stages. Firstly it will assess the importance of Britain's slave trade in the context of global commerce, especially during the 18th century. Secondly it will attempt to show the degree of significance - and the reason - for Liverpool's involvement as a British port, and thirdly, to find out whether or not this had a bearing on Britain's economy in general. In other words, the essay will attempt to ascertain whether Britain's slave trade "was the centre of a global commerce", and whether Liverpool was, in turn, the central city for that particular trade. From around 1600, Britain had colonised or conquered a network of territories all over the world including parts of the Americas - According to Professor Kenneth Morgan, "By 1797-8, North America and the West Indies received 57 per cent of British exports, and supplied 32 per cent of imports"1. The 18th century saw Britain rise to an undisputed dominant position among her rival European powers. ...read more.


E. H. Hair believes that Liverpool was favoured over other European ports, mainly because of the quality of its shipping industry. The slave trade needed, he writes, "private shippers of high efficiency" to reduce economic factors such as "shipping and trading costs (including high ship-depreciation and high mortality of crews and traders)"8 These factors appear to have combined, and there remains little doubt over Liverpool's becoming the biggest slave trading port in the world throughout this century. So was all this "an important factor" for the economic development of the rest of Britain? In his 1944 book, Capitalism and Slavery, Eric Williams was the first to put forward the idea of a link between the spoils of Britain's colonies and the start of industrialisation, stating that the profits from slavery were channelled into domestic industrial enterprises. These profits, according to Williams, were the main source of capital accumulation that funded the nascent Industrial Revolution. But Kenneth Morgan argues against this. Annual profits from Britain's slave trade were on average less than 10%, this small profit being largely due to the attendant risks. Also, between 1688 and 1800, writes Morgan, the British national income from slave trade profits was small - almost always less than 0.5% of the total. ...read more.


the largest estimates of profits from slave trade and plantations are insufficient to account fully for the industrial "take-off" that occurred in the later 18th Century".14 The tremendous growth of the Lancashire cotton industries after 1800 meant that new markets were soon needed, wider horizons than Africa and the West Indies. According to Craton, the American "new south" revitalised slavery in America, and "Liverpool gained greatly in importance even as the slave trade on which it was founded was officially abolished". The "respectability" of the cotton industry was conveniently used to obscure Liverpool's disreputable past. But it was still slavery, not the slave trade, which continued to be a main support for both Liverpool's prosperity and Lancashire's industries. These two factors "provided such a large component of Britain's 19th Century [world] supremacy"15 So it would appear that Eric Williams is in something of an isolated position - other historians are able to provide evidence to the contrary. Liverpool certainly became the hub of the 18th Century West Indian slave trade, which was in turn "the centre of a global commerce". But this had very little bearing on Britain's economy. Rather, Liverpool herself was the main beneficiary, and it was the use of slaves in the 19th Century cotton industry, which better fits the description of "an important factor in British economic growth". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which the fast economic growth of China and growth of ...

    5 star(s)

    This is because it will act as an incentive for British worker to work harder or to invest in training courses to improve their productivity rate. In addition, China is attracting many firms because of it high productivity rate. UK workers need to work harder and faster to compete against China.

  2. 'Anarchy is what states make of it' (A Wendt) Do you agree?

    technology or might, and economic strength, are material, and that evidence of power exists when states are forced to change or alter their behavior. However Constructivists argue that the forces of power can also go beyond material, they can be ideational.

  1. What are the main determinants of industrial location?

    Another factor outlined includes the dispersion forces: As production concentrates, the price of immobile factors will rise relative to locations where production does not take place. Agglomeration and dispersion forces decide where firms locate (Fujita, Krugman and Venables, 1999). Trade barriers will affect both trade costs and to a degree the mobility of labour.

  2. Economic Growth HSC Notes

    This meant that wealth of households increased which would encourage greater borrowing and consumption, this effect is commonly referred to as The Wealth Effect. Recently there has been a reversal in this effect, as due to the GFC there has been a fall in global stockmarkets which reduced the value the investments and superannuation assets.

  1. This paper investigates an evidence to support the HOV model by carrying out a ...

    vector of outputs in each industry, vector of demands of each good and vector of net exports for country i, respectively, so that Ti = Yi - Di. Let (mxn) matrix A=[ajk]' be input-output matrix, in which m represents the number of production factors that are internationally perfectly immobile.

  2. Colonialism and Colonies.

    This sector employed unskilled or semiskilled members of the relatively small native middle class, who earned more than their fellow citizens, although they were low-paid by European standards. The colony's railway system operated like a funnel, moving goods efficiently outward to the ports, but not from point to point within the interior.

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    The income which the state obtained, mainly through foreign aid, was seen as similar to water and pasture which Somalis competed for in the pre-state era. The practical idea behind this is that each and every pastoral Somali, thus, representing his clan, has a right to appropriate a slice of this gift from Allah.

  2. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    * In 1830, the Englishmen John and Richard Lander found the mouth of the Niger River, which lead to the interior * Steamships were recently invented and in 1832-34 and again n1841-42 the British sent steamships up the Niger to explore, but were ruined by malaria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work