• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Liverpool's slave trade was the centre of a global commerce and an important factor in British economic growth." To what extent would you agree with this opinion?

Extracts from this document...


Part B -"Liverpool's slave trade was the centre of a global commerce and an important factor in British economic growth." To what extent would you agree with this opinion? This essay will attempt to answer the question by approaching it in three stages. Firstly it will assess the importance of Britain's slave trade in the context of global commerce, especially during the 18th century. Secondly it will attempt to show the degree of significance - and the reason - for Liverpool's involvement as a British port, and thirdly, to find out whether or not this had a bearing on Britain's economy in general. In other words, the essay will attempt to ascertain whether Britain's slave trade "was the centre of a global commerce", and whether Liverpool was, in turn, the central city for that particular trade. From around 1600, Britain had colonised or conquered a network of territories all over the world including parts of the Americas - According to Professor Kenneth Morgan, "By 1797-8, North America and the West Indies received 57 per cent of British exports, and supplied 32 per cent of imports"1. The 18th century saw Britain rise to an undisputed dominant position among her rival European powers. ...read more.


E. H. Hair believes that Liverpool was favoured over other European ports, mainly because of the quality of its shipping industry. The slave trade needed, he writes, "private shippers of high efficiency" to reduce economic factors such as "shipping and trading costs (including high ship-depreciation and high mortality of crews and traders)"8 These factors appear to have combined, and there remains little doubt over Liverpool's becoming the biggest slave trading port in the world throughout this century. So was all this "an important factor" for the economic development of the rest of Britain? In his 1944 book, Capitalism and Slavery, Eric Williams was the first to put forward the idea of a link between the spoils of Britain's colonies and the start of industrialisation, stating that the profits from slavery were channelled into domestic industrial enterprises. These profits, according to Williams, were the main source of capital accumulation that funded the nascent Industrial Revolution. But Kenneth Morgan argues against this. Annual profits from Britain's slave trade were on average less than 10%, this small profit being largely due to the attendant risks. Also, between 1688 and 1800, writes Morgan, the British national income from slave trade profits was small - almost always less than 0.5% of the total. ...read more.


the largest estimates of profits from slave trade and plantations are insufficient to account fully for the industrial "take-off" that occurred in the later 18th Century".14 The tremendous growth of the Lancashire cotton industries after 1800 meant that new markets were soon needed, wider horizons than Africa and the West Indies. According to Craton, the American "new south" revitalised slavery in America, and "Liverpool gained greatly in importance even as the slave trade on which it was founded was officially abolished". The "respectability" of the cotton industry was conveniently used to obscure Liverpool's disreputable past. But it was still slavery, not the slave trade, which continued to be a main support for both Liverpool's prosperity and Lancashire's industries. These two factors "provided such a large component of Britain's 19th Century [world] supremacy"15 So it would appear that Eric Williams is in something of an isolated position - other historians are able to provide evidence to the contrary. Liverpool certainly became the hub of the 18th Century West Indian slave trade, which was in turn "the centre of a global commerce". But this had very little bearing on Britain's economy. Rather, Liverpool herself was the main beneficiary, and it was the use of slaves in the 19th Century cotton industry, which better fits the description of "an important factor in British economic growth". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which the fast economic growth of China and growth of ...

    5 star(s)

    It has been evident that Chinese cities have been swarmed in toxic grey clouds and it is said that only 1% of the country's 560 million city dwellers breathe air considered safe by the EU. Indeed the situation can be a cause for concern for Britain because with an increase

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    It is all very well to say that the Doha Round should be used to realise Scenario One while avoiding Scenarios Two and Three, as might be the inclination of the politically ignorant free-trade economist. The political dilemma, however, is that this is going to be very difficult given the narrow and fractured market access constituency within the WTO.

  1. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    * In 1830, the Englishmen John and Richard Lander found the mouth of the Niger River, which lead to the interior * Steamships were recently invented and in 1832-34 and again n1841-42 the British sent steamships up the Niger to explore, but were ruined by malaria.

  2. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    in 1991 and is ongoing. There are multiple causes of civil war. When looking at the statistics Somalia is the perfect environment for internal conflict to breed in. Countries which have a substantial share of their income (GDP) coming from the export of primary commodities are radically more at risk of conflict.

  1. 'Anarchy is what states make of it' (A Wendt) Do you agree?

    International law can over-rule the established power of sovereignty, because although sovereigns have the right to be free of any power's interference of their own domestic affairs, if the international

  2. Outline the debate about whether 'export-led growth' is better or worse than 'import substituting ...

    On the other hand, demand for manufactured products rises much more steeply over time. According to Todaro (2000), every 1 per cent increase in an industrialised country's income will raise the demand for food by 0.6 per cent and for primary commodities by 0.5 per cent, but demand for manufactures by 1.9 per cent.

  1. Examine the roles and place of trade blocs in the global economy.

    Removing these means there is complete freedom of capital movements for financial institutions. Fiscal barriers are the different tax rates applied to goods and services in member countries. One result of a high indirect tax is to discourage consumption, including imports of the taxed product.

  2. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    Other Languages Six other major Chinese dialects (including Tibetan and Mongolian) and at least 41 other minority languages. This would be difficult as China has a lot of languages to overcome this problem over the language barrier by having the staff of David Lloyd trained or hired depending on whether or not they speak the languages of China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work