• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mercantilism is the economic theory that a nation's prosperity depends on its supply of gold and silver; that the total volume of trade is unchangeable.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mercantilism is the economic theory that a nation's prosperity depends on its supply of gold and silver; that the total volume of trade is unchangeable. This theory suggests that the government should play an active role in the economy by encouraging exports and discouraging imports, especially through the use of tariffs. Spain and England used the mercantile system to benefit the mother countries. The mercantile system had special regulations, which usually extracted some sort of reaction from the colonies. If necessary, the policies would be changed to better suit the mother country. The favorable balance of trade was upheld through certain regulations. No foreign trade was allowed for the colony unless it passed through the mother country first and it moved on mother country ships. Furthermore, no foreign settlers were allowed in the colony. No colonial industry was allowed. The colony had to remain dependent on the mother country for industrial necessities, it was not allowed to become competition for foreign markets, and migrations restrictions limited availability of skilled artisans. ...read more.

Middle

Under the provisions of this legislation, trade with the colonies was to be conducted only in English or colonial ships. Certain "enumerated" items (such as sugar, tobacco and indigo) were to be shipped only within the empire. Trade destined for nations outside the empire had to go first to England. Some of the legislation was designed to protect colonial interests. For example, tobacco production in England was prohibited, leaving the colonies as the sole source of this lucrative product. The American colonists were never fully comfortable with these acts, but became ardently opposed with the passage of the Sugar Act of 1773. Some of the regulations and restrictions placed on the colonies, however, extracted a negative reaction from the colonies. The Navigation Acts, more properly called the British Acts of Trade, angered the colonies and created certain resentment between the colonies (American colonies) and the mother country. The acts were an outgrowth of mercantilism, and followed principles laid down by Tudor and early Stuart trade regulations. The rise of the Dutch carrying trade, which threatened to drive English shipping from the seas, was the immediate cause for the Navigation Act of 1651, and it in turn was a major cause of the First Dutch War. ...read more.

Conclusion

Depending on whether or not negative reactions were derived from the mercantile regulations and restrictions, some change might've occurred. In Spain, all colonial trade was channeled through a single port, first Seville and then Cadiz. After 1765, this policy was relaxed to allow trade by other in illicit trade. During the eighteenth century, the Spanish relaxed their colonial restrictions somewhat, but only because they realized that the old system was by then outmoded and unenforceable. In England, vigorous attempts to prevent smuggling in the American colonies after 1765 led to arbitrary seizures of ships and aroused hostility. The legislation had an unfavorable effect on the Channel Islands, Scotland (before the Act of Union of 1707), and especially Ireland, by excluding them from a preferential position within the system. Shaken by the American Revolution, the system, along with mercantilism, fell into decline. The acts were finally repealed in 1849. Mercantilism was widely used in many different superpowers in the 18th century. Depending on what superpower used it, the colonies under the superpowers were restricted from doing certain things, and had to follow certain mercantile regulations. The mercantile systems most likely ended up with the colonies undergoing revolutions (America and England) which resulted in the end of mercantilism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Why was Britain the First Industrial Nation?

    At the time of the industrial revolution Britain had a well-established government who greatly encouraged economic expansion. The English Government allowed the domestic economy to function with few restrictions and encouraged technological change. Many British merchants had large amounts of capital for investment in new industrial enterprises, compared with Europeans.

  2. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    German or a French employer and was more prejudiced against innovation than his foreign counterpart was".7 Government reports and editorial comments in the trade journals of the time seem to echo the same views. A good example of the growing disquiet in the period is the appointment of the Royal Commission on the Depression of Trade and Industry in 1886.

  1. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    Figure 4 China Developing Country China is a developing country because over the last few decades it has seen a boom in the number of exports that it has needed to do also the technology it offers has improved vastly and this has seen a demand in the amount of

  2. In this report, we shall explore the reasons for the shift from multilateralism to ...

    Hence there is a clear need for establishing a strong surveillance system at the regional level to detect signs of a crisis at an earlier stage and reduce its severity should it occur. Such a relation will lead to deep and fast exchange of information, which promotes cooperative action among them.

  1. This paper investigates an evidence to support the HOV model by carrying out a ...

    Therefore, trade is regarded as the international exchange of the factors embodied in those goods. Expression of the theory in this form also highlights the logic of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory in its focus on the relative availability of factors (Davis and Weinstein 2001:3).

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    gain the friendship of a few persons".15 An international division of labour based on specialisation and exchange spontaneously integrates hitherto separated national economies into a worldwide co-operative system that caters for reciprocal wants, or, in the felicitous words of Edwin Cannan, "renders mutual service".

  1. Is the nation racialised?

    Why he claims more money? Furthermore, we live in a free market world. There is a strong competition between people for about anything. Moreover, why some believe that they deserve more from someone which is not from the same country as they?

  2. Colonialism and Colonies.

    They also did not, for the most part, intentionally destroy indigenous (native) cultures. Thus, the geographical circumstances and historical dynamics of exploitation colonies are profoundly different from those of colonies of settlement. A colony of exploitation had an economy based on products of the labor of local inhabitants, working either on their own land or on plantations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work