• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Technological Change and Markets & The Case For Public Ownership of Utility Companies.

Extracts from this document...


(a) Explain how technological change has affected the structure and competitiveness of markets such as those for telephone services, recorded music or cars. (15 marks) Technological change is defined as where new innovation and development in technology has allowed new technology to be create or existing technology to be upgraded. An example of technological change is the introduction of fibre optics compared to old technology such as copper wires for the telephone line. Market competitiveness is defined as to the extent to which the sellers in the market compete not only on prices to provide the greater customer utility (via allocative efficiency where there is no consumer surplus) but also on non-price competition such as providing greater support for consumers to enable their product to be more competitive based on consumer satisfaction. For the telephone service, as stated in the quote, there used to be one main supplier of the market. This is therefore a form of a monopoly and this may be discouraging to consumers due to a restricted output and raised prices ? this is a form of allocative inefficiency as the monopolies are using consumer surplus in the form of greater profits and so the quantity produced is not at the socially desirable level. ...read more.


This is because, if we assume that the firms act in a more of a perfectly competitive manner, firms may choose to compete on price with each other, therefore assuming there are low barriers to entry within the market, the firms cannot make supernormal profit in the long run and so if they do, this will only attract new firms into the market. Therefore, the firms will be price takers based upon the socially optimum level and therefore this means that allocative efficiency occurs as no consumer surplus is extracted as the firms need to compete on prices as consumers can easily switch providers based on perfect information and so this should bring the price down. Also, the firms have to set the market clearing price and so as they produce on the lowest point of their average cost curve, this also promotes productive efficiency and so in the market, this may be beneficial as the private firms allocate resources where there are best utilised to gain the greatest customer satisfaction. This can be shown in the diagram below where both allocative and productive efficiency are shown in the perfectly competitive model. However, we are making a generalising assumption that the firms were compete on price within the utility market. ...read more.


Yet, as seen in the UK today, utility companies do act more in the form of a natural monopoly and this leads to the question whether this could be improved in the long run. Perhaps through correct government legalisation, this would allow companies to share facilities together such as fibre optics or copper cables, this would reduce the barrier to entry to enable new firms to enter the market to make it more into a competitive market structure. Yet, it is often ?easier said than done? as it is not simply the case of ensuring firms share infrastructure as laws need to be in place to begin with and these changes may actually deter existing firms to continue in the UK market. However, utilities are a necessity and so perhaps by using private sector firms which may promote innovation through research and development that may not be seen in a public firm, then the government may need to issue tougher penalties on firms that exploit their monopoly powers (such as charging higher gas prices even if the price of gas has fallen) and also ensuring there is tougher regulation. Thus, in order to make this regulation more efficient, perhaps the government should ensure that all utility companies are transparent in their finances to promote competition so they do not exploit their monopoly powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Discuss whether the privatisation of British Rail has been successful. Evaluate whether the new ...

    Looking at all this is would be tempting to say that safety has deteriorated since privatisation and that may be true, but how significant are the changes. There were major train crashes in the era of nationalisation and we cannot hark back to some sort of golden age before privatisation.

  2. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    but it may have a much greater ability to get efficient than several small competing firms with limited funds. Even though a monopolist has no competition in the good market, he/she may face a potential threat involved of competition which is takeover or merger.

  1. Evaluate the role played by barriers to entry in the long run

    Government Policy - Some government policies make it difficult or may even restrict competition entirely depending on the market and the circumstances. For example to enter a market there may be requirements for companies to have certain licences or permits (I.e gambling)

  2. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    Comparing perfect competition with monopolistic competition If both monopolistic competitor and the perfect competitor make zero economic profits in the long run, then I ask my self, how are they different? The answer lied in the fact that the demand curve facing the individual perfect competitor is horizontal, that is, the price elasticity of demand is infinity.

  1. What are the origins of the Pension Crisis and what can be done to ...

    the tag that it wants to make the public "work till they drop". Recent scandals justify the need for a certain degree of regulation in the pension industry. Legally enforceable protection for schemes and benefits would reward employers who make decent provision for employees' welfare and remove the opportunity for bad employers to plunder employees' retirement income.

  2. To what extent do you consider monopolies to be in the public interest?

    In a competitive industry, a single price is set to all of its consumers unless different price targeting strategies are employed. Yet, monopolists not only have the ability to charge a higher price than competitive firms supplying the same product, but they also have the ability to charge significantly different prices to different customers for the same product.

  1. Explain three reasons why labour markets may be imperfectly competitive

    elasticity of supply of labour will be relativity inelastic and so will the demand (as there are no close substitutes to qualified accountants). Therefore, for low skilled jobs such as cashiers, due to now qualifications needed, supply will be relativity elastic and especially as the marginal revenue productivity would be

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    Examples of some oligopolistic firms are Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's and Morrisons. Because this assignment relates directly to oligopoly, I will now analyse the oligopoly market structure in more depth. THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF OLIGOPOLY Oligopolies include positive and negative aspects.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work