• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The evolution of GATT, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

As we look at the evolution of GATT, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, we must understand what GATT really is. GATT was established to break down trade barriers (in the form of tariffs, quotas, preferential trade agreements between countries, etc) to make the flow of commodities and capital less restricted by national government influence. There are many actors that play a role in how the system works. The United States assumed leadership as the worlds foremost economic and political power. The USSR wanted to play a role in jump-starting the European economy, and the U.S. was willing to help. The U.S. mindset was that by supporting trade they would be destroying Communism and eventually establishing democracy worldwide. ...read more.

Middle

But the truth is that the large, productive nations have a great deal to gain with foreign markets lowering tariffs, while poor nations have little to gain when the markets of the wealthy are already dominated by local producers, while their own markets at home are flooded by the wealthy nations. Not all large countries always benefit, the United States ran into a few problems in its attempts to aid other countries. Countries like Japan were exporting more than they were importing at a drastic rate, and were beginning to dominate the world market. In 1985 Japan was the second largest market economy in the world. Japan had a high savings rate and the U.S. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is just very difficult to predict what is going to happen, any argument can be shot down when dealing with social choice. You can predict what you think one country will do based on what they have done in the past, but you can not know for sure. An example is the soldiers dilema; when two soldiers are seperated and intrrogated thay assume that the the one will not talk and vice versa, but because they are seperated they don't actually know what the other is doing. This example just goes to show that even with the actors hoping to read the other actors, they can never really know what is going to happen, therefor there is no security in GATT or any other system, you just have to allow tha actor to pursue their own intersets and hope they coincide with yours. Jesse Hamby POSI 4359 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. World Trade Organisation was founded in 1995 and resulted from a series of General ...

    The issue evolves around the prisoner's dilemma, with individual incentives for nations to restrict trade, but a collective interest that all nations should pursue it. In general, tariffs may only further protect inefficient firms or even whole industries, countries may be better off to let those firms go bust and redeploy their resources.

  2. Explain the evolution and characteristics of the debt problems of LDCs. In the light ...

    However, the IMF and World Bank still continue to make sustainability the emphasis of their strategies. The IMF argues that debt cancellation for HIPCs would be unfair since it ignores countries that are not part of the initiative because they have either succeeded in increasing economic growth or have managed to make repayments.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Economically, standards harmonisation hacks away at the principle of comparative advantage. It ignores the fact that policies and institutions differ according to differences in circumstance, not least comparative costs which vary with levels of development. Imposing regulations that raise costs out of line with national productivity levels would restrict developing

  2. Does Trade Benefit Everyone?

    Brazil should do the same but specialise in coffee and trade for cars. After specialisation both countries are better off and the total world production of their goods has increased and prices drop. This example is also an example of Hecksher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theory which states that DC's are more likely to

  1. International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a ...

    There is only one establishment all over the world, which is Honselersdijk in the Netherlands. They cooperate with the Flower Auction Holland, one of the major flower auctions in Holland. Gemos was established in 1984 by Gerrit Voogd, who still owns the business.

  2. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    Although China is still developing it will not be long until it is in line and as powerful as other countries such as the UK and U.S.A. Afghanistan- Non-Developing Country This is a country that is poverty stricken and a country that has problems with its finance this was all

  1. Emergency Economic Recovery Program From the United Nations International Report, Vol. I, no. A1

    There is a significant rural-urban migration and urban population growth is four times that in rural areas. Insufficient attention to the interrelationship of population and development during the past decades has already brought Haiti to the brink of its carrying capacity and heavily mortgaged its future sustainable human development.

  2. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

    Investment rights pertain a huge degree of power, lacking of any sorts of responsibility guidelines to which the investor should adhere to. Many consider this to be inherently dangerous since there is no balance of rights and responsibilities even though the influence of corporate interests are essentially equivalent, if not more powerful, than local and national governments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work