The Belgian colonial effort in Africa began with H.M Stanley’s (see figure 1) exploration of the Congo basin in the year 1878, under the instruction of King Leopold II. Stanley set up outposts along the Congo River, and mediated amongst the Congolese, while Leopold persuaded other European diplomatic powers to recognise him as the ruler of the Congo, a right which he was entitled to under the conditions of the Treaty of Berlin. The country nowadays referred to as the Congo became Leopold’s personal colony on the 1st of July 1885, and was renamed as the ‘Congo Free State’. This fateful day marked the beginning of an era of oppression, exploitation and suffering for the Congolese people under the merciless rule of King Leopold II. Leopold, as a famed misanthropist and self-appointed sovereign of the Congo Free State, secured trade agreements from the tribes of the Congo Basin through a combination of promises, threats and trickery. As Nkrumah argues, “Leopold’s plan was to run the Congo as a private domain…and to exploit it on an international scale” (Nkrumah, D, 2004). It is quite apparent that the Belgian dominance of the Congo state in the 19th Century was by and large a product of Leopold’s gluttonous and voracious nature as an individual. In an attempt to conceal the untold barbarities of the Belgian-controlled Congo, King Leopold II formed an organisation known as the International African Association to act as a cover for his blatantly avaricious actions. An excerpt from the association’s rationale reads as follows:
The International African Association promises:
1. To take from the natives of this ceded country no occupied or cultivated lands, except by mutual agreement.
2. To promote to its utmost the prosperity of the said country.
3. To protect its inhabitants from all oppression or foreign intrusion.
4. It authorizes the chiefs to hoist its flag; to settle all local disputes; and to maintain its [I.A.A.] authority with the natives.
Contrary to the reassurances contained in this treaty, Leopold’s, and consequently, the Belgian nation’s motives in Africa, existed firmly in the realm of exploitation, misrepresented to the wider community as national policy. The Belgian government weaved a thin convenient theory of a race struggle in order to rationalize the subjugation of the Congolese people. These early years of Belgian rule in the Congo were only indicators of the horrors that were still to come as the Belgian colonialists succumbed to greed and further exploited the Congo nation.
The Belgian exploitation of the Congo occurred on two levels, firstly, in the pillaging of the country for raw materials and cheap labour, and secondly, in the mistreatment of the native Congolese people. Economic motives were often regarded as the driving force behind the Belgian colonialist movement. The Congo promised Belgium cotton, silk, rubber, vegetable oils and the rarer minerals and metals, all of which could be had cheaply in the African society and then exported back to Europe to realise capital gains. As Hobson argues, “the imperial impulse was always one of capitalistic greed for cheap raw materials, advantageous markets, good investments and fresh fields of exploitation” (Hobson, A, 1902). The Congo Free State was, by its very nature, exploitative and abusive; the outcome of a new drive by Belgium which shattered mutual trade agreements which had previously existed. Although Belgian authorities argued that their colonial activities were mutually beneficial to both the colonialists and the natives, Leopold’s beliefs and actions insinuated a culture whereby the Belgians were the exclusive benefactors of the situation. While the Congolese had their villages destroyed and their traditional tribal barriers demolished, the Belgians enjoyed a mass of land eighty times larger than their home country and rich with precious minerals and metals. In the generation between 1871 and 1900, Belgium added 900,000 square miles and 8,500,000 inhabitants to its empire, placing it in a position to become a genuine industrial competitor to the developing nations of France and Germany (Thomson, D, 1957). The amount of wealth that was extracted from the Congo Free State was disproportionate to the compensation that the Congolese received, in fact, many of the native Congolese were forced into poverty as a direct result of the Belgian colonialist’s abuse of power. In the early 1890’s, Leopold’s private African army, the ‘Force Publique’, drove out competing traders from the area, resulting in a perfect economic monopoly. While Leopold tried to pass this off as a great humanitarian movement, its real purpose was to gain control of the upper reaches of the Congo River and recruit more workers. In addition to the money gained through the export of rubber and other natural resources, Belgium took advantage of the lucrative slave trade market, and began to send Congolese natives to work throughout Africa and Europe as slaves. Under King Leopold’s instruction, Congolese children and young men were displaced from their villages and sent overseas on a massive scale. According to an official Belgian publication, in the course of a single year (1888), 104,000 slaves were exported from the Congo Free State for unpaid work overseas (Handbook of the Congo, Belgian Government, 1890). Belgium’s combination of economic mercantilism and self-indulgent rationales negated its arguments that its efforts were in the interest of goodwill, thereby exposing its underlying motive of unadulterated greed.
The tragic economic exploitation of the Congo simply pales in comparison to the atrocities inflicted upon the Congolese by the Belgian colonialists. The human impact of the Belgian imperial regime (see figure 2) is depicted in Omowale’s observations of the treatment of the Congolese, where he states “Leopold made it mandatory that when a black man did not produce a certain quota of rubber, his hand was cut off, his foot was cut off, a black woman’s breast was cut off” (Omowale, M, 1895). While the Belgians termed the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as ‘the age of African exploration’, this term is misleading; it was the age of African exploitation. Throughout the entire Congo Free State, examples of abuse and slavery abounded, to the point where in the Belgian-controlled Congo, the word ‘black’ became synonymous with ‘slave’. This prejudice and cruelty aroused much hostile comment from further abroad, and left an unmistakeable legacy on the people of the Congo. The Belgian colonialists took a literal approach to Karl Pearson’s ideology of ‘bad stock’, with the result being that their actions epitomised a complete antithesis to the concept expressed in Rudyard Kipling’s poem ‘The White Man’s Burden’. Rather than attempting to educate and ‘civilise’ the Congolese from a European perspective, the Belgians chose to regard their African counterparts as a “lower race of man” (Pearson, K, 1899), and instead “create a mighty aristocracy of the white races” (Treit, V, 1879). In addition to diplomatically establishing their assumed superiority among the Congolese, the Belgian colonialists became submissive to the love of the power that proceeds from enslaving man’s fellow creations, and exploited the local inhabitants through means of slavery and violence. Although Belgium declared that its first objective on entering the Congo was to suppress the slave trade, its true objectives were not to suppress slavery, but to change its nature. Its object was to make slavery more profitable by employing local slaves in the Congo and using them to aid in the production of rubber products. Baver, a Belgian colonialist opposed to Leopold’s doctrines, observed that the workers in the rubber plantations had “wasted features and staring eyes, perpetually trying to keep afoot despite their exhaustion” (Baver, L, 1935). This is supported by Conan Doyle, a modern-day historian, who argues that “the white Belgian agents; motivated by remuneration and promotion opportunities, exercised untold cruelty upon their slave rubber collectors” (Doyle, C, 1986). Leopold systemised the use of forced labour in the Congo Free State, and was known to say that “only the whip can civilise the black” (cited in Harding, G, 1999). During the decades of King Leopold’s rule in the Congo, his reign of greed and oppression became viewed with reference to the last words of Joseph Conrad’s novel ‘Heart of Darkness’; “the horror, the horror!” (Conrad, J, 1945) In short, the Belgian colonialism of the Congo was representative of an imperial movement motivated by greed, rather than goodwill or humanitarian concern.
The Belgian nation’s alleged ‘peaceful colonial policy’ was nothing but a thinly veiled cover story masking the Belgian’s true motive; greed. Not only did the Belgian colonialists exploit the nation’s natural resources, enslave the native peoples and enforce a foreign form of diplomacy, but they also failed to fulfil their promises to foster a sense of European civilisation among the Congolese. Belgium falsely represented the colonisation and exploitation of the Congo as a philanthropic experiment stemming from a national sense of goodwill and humanitarian concern. Compelling evidence and personal recounts has made it hard to disagree that the Belgian colonialist movement was almost exclusively motivated by greed. The heartless actions of the Belgians has left a permanent scar on the pride of the Congolese people, and even today “the wailings from the Congo are slow and repressed, but irresistibly, the cry grows” (Baver, L, 1935).
Bibliography:
Ade, Ajaji, 1989, Africa in the Nineteenth Century until the 1880’s, Heinemann, California
Alman, P. 2003, Leopold II – King of the Belgians[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 26/8/04)
Baver, L, 1935, Leopold the Unloved, Brown and Company, London
Bennett, Norman, 1984, Africa and Europe: From Roman Times to National Independence, Holmes and Meier, New York
Boahen, A, 1985, General History of Africa, University of California Press, California
Bohannan, P, and Phillip, D, 1995, Africa and Africans, Prospect Heights, Waveland
Collins, R, 1970, Problems in the History of Colonial Africa 1860-1960, Englewood Cliffs, Denver
Cowie, H, 1993, The Essential Collection: Bastille to Sarajevo, Phoenix: Albert Park, Australia
Crowder, M, 1974, History of West Africa, Longman, London
Davidson, B, 1978, Let Freedom Come – Africa in Modern History, Brown, Boston
Doyle, P, 2002, King Leopold II – A Who2 Profile[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 24/8/04)
Hachi, P, 2001, Karl Pearson (1857-1936)[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 1/9/04)
Handman, Max, 2002, John A. Hobson[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 12/9/04)
Harding, G, 1999, Belgium Battles with Colonial Past[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 14/9/04)
Hargreaves, G, 1979, The End of Colonial Rule in West Africa - Essays in Contemporary History, Barnes & Noble, New York
Hoedman, O, 2003, The Scramble, Congo Under Leopold and Later Developments[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 20/8/04)
Lemkin, P, 2003, Definition of Genocide – WordIQ Dictionary and Encyclopaedia[ONLINE], Available from: URL (accessed 23/8/04)
Lenin, V, 1950, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow
Marwick, A and Simpson, W, 1990, Documents 1: 1900-1929, Open University Press, Bristol
Mass, J, 2000, Arguments Towards Nonviolence[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 13/9/04)
Mitchell, J, 1997, Leopold II[ONLINE], Available from: URL (accessed 15/9/04)
Ngass, P, 2002, David Livingstone (1813-1873) & Victoria Falls[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 24/8/04)
Nkrumah, D, 2004, Untitled[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 1/9/04)
Perry, M, Pedan, J & Von Lave (eds), 1991, Sources of the Western Tradition, Houghton, Boston
Riding, A, 2003, Belgium Confronts its Heart of Darkness[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 17/8/04)
Rocker, R, 2001, Anarchism and Anarcho – Syndicalism by Rudolf Rocker[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 31/8/04)
Tarlton Law Library, 2003, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 13/9/04)
Teep, P, 1969, Portraits and Documents: Later Nineteenth Century, 1868-1919, Hutchinson, London
Thomson, D, 1957, Europe Since Napoleon, Longmans, London
Thomson, D, 1996, Imperialism[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 27/8/04)
Tome, S, 2004, Congo Case Study: Imperialism in Africa[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 31/8/04)
Twain, M, 2001, Leopold II of Belgium[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 14/9/04)
U.S. Department of State, 2004, Belgium[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 26/8/04)
Wagner, C, 2001, Boys Clothing: European Royalty – Belgium: Leopold II[ONLINE], Available from: URL; (accessed 14/9/04)
Walsh, M, 1968, Prologue: A Documentary History of Europe, 1848-1960, Cassell, Melbourne
Worden, Nigel, 1985, Slavery In Dutch South Africa, African Studies series, no. 44. - Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York; Cambridge University Press
Zait, P, 2001, CNN – 3D Globe: Democratic Republic of Congo[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 26/8/04)
Zwich, J, 2003, Reforming the Heart of Darkness – The Congo Reform Movement[ONLINE], Available from: URL: (accessed 24/8/04)