• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Imperial Impulse of Capitalist Greed - THE BELGIAN CONGO

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Belgian exploitation of the Congo was the single most murderous episode in the European seizure of Africa" (Hochschild, A, 1999). While the recollections of colonial history are scarred with tales of greed, subordination and exploitation, the New Imperialist age; the years between 1875 and 1914, are characterized by an almost-unfathomable mentality of profit through the exploitation of local peoples. The study of this New Imperialist mindset reveals tales of untold cruelty and oppression on a massive scale. The most notable imperial atrocity is that of the Belgian-controlled Congo Basin, a traditional society that was transformed into an arena for slavery and abuse through the hands of greedy and ruthless Belgian imperialists. The determining factor for Belgian imperialism in the Congo between 1878 and 1905 was greed, rather than goodwill or humanitarian concern. As colonialists raped and pillaged the African countryside, European diplomatic powers fought amongst one another to secure their respective share of the continent and Belgium, under the rule of the criminally indifferent King Leopold II, made clear its intention to "seize African territory and then rule the country as if there were no inhabitants" (Leopold, L, 1880). ...read more.

Middle

The Belgian government weaved a thin convenient theory of a race struggle in order to rationalize the subjugation of the Congolese people. These early years of Belgian rule in the Congo were only indicators of the horrors that were still to come as the Belgian colonialists succumbed to greed and further exploited the Congo nation. The Belgian exploitation of the Congo occurred on two levels, firstly, in the pillaging of the country for raw materials and cheap labour, and secondly, in the mistreatment of the native Congolese people. Economic motives were often regarded as the driving force behind the Belgian colonialist movement. The Congo promised Belgium cotton, silk, rubber, vegetable oils and the rarer minerals and metals, all of which could be had cheaply in the African society and then exported back to Europe to realise capital gains. As Hobson argues, "the imperial impulse was always one of capitalistic greed for cheap raw materials, advantageous markets, good investments and fresh fields of exploitation" (Hobson, A, 1902). The Congo Free State was, by its very nature, exploitative and abusive; the outcome of a new drive by Belgium which shattered mutual trade agreements which had previously existed. ...read more.

Conclusion

During the decades of King Leopold's rule in the Congo, his reign of greed and oppression became viewed with reference to the last words of Joseph Conrad's novel 'Heart of Darkness'; "the horror, the horror!" (Conrad, J, 1945) In short, the Belgian colonialism of the Congo was representative of an imperial movement motivated by greed, rather than goodwill or humanitarian concern. The Belgian nation's alleged 'peaceful colonial policy' was nothing but a thinly veiled cover story masking the Belgian's true motive; greed. Not only did the Belgian colonialists exploit the nation's natural resources, enslave the native peoples and enforce a foreign form of diplomacy, but they also failed to fulfil their promises to foster a sense of European civilisation among the Congolese. Belgium falsely represented the colonisation and exploitation of the Congo as a philanthropic experiment stemming from a national sense of goodwill and humanitarian concern. Compelling evidence and personal recounts has made it hard to disagree that the Belgian colonialist movement was almost exclusively motivated by greed. The heartless actions of the Belgians has left a permanent scar on the pride of the Congolese people, and even today "the wailings from the Congo are slow and repressed, but irresistibly, the cry grows" (Baver, L, 1935). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Colonialism and Colonies.

    These colonies have also had difficulty attracting loans into the subsistence sector because returns on such loans are low. Investment has tended to go into the export sector where it will produce better results because exports, such as tin, coffee, or palm oil, are in demand and have established markets.

  2. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    Politics in the Developing World. Blackwell Publishing. 45 The Somaliland Times. (2002). Learning the lessons. Available: http://www.somalilandtimes.net/Archive/45/4510.htm 46 U.S. Department of State. (2011). Somalia. Available: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2863.htm 47 Paul Collier. (2006). Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and their Implications for Policy. Available: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~econpco/research/pdfs/EconomicCausesofCivilConflict-ImplicationsforPolicy.pdf 48 Lenntech. (2006). Environmental effects of warfare.

  1. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    * Other colonies were taken to ease access to others and to make them more profitable. For example, Britain needed the Suez Canal and therefore took Egypt. Since the Nile is the lifeline of Egypt, they needed control over it.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    What was agreed in Doha? Not least, China and Taiwan were welcomed into the club. The other key decisions were:78 * Market access: Continued but upgraded negotiations to liberalise agriculture and services markets, and new negotiations to reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers on industrial goods.

  1. To What Extent Did Imperial Concerns Guide British Foreign Policy Between 1890- 1907?

    only a matter of time before the latter [Britain] became part of The Triple alliance"- Eric Wilmot. It was this arrogance to believe that Britain wanted an alliance would be just one of a long line of causes, which would lead Europe to 'stumble' into the first world, this alliance

  2. In what ways is the government attempting to increase the willingness to wor

    This shows at this time low unemployment meant high inflation. Unemployment peaked at nearly 10% in 1993, in the same year inflation was quite low at just above 2%. Since inflation has been relatively steady fluctuating between just less than 1% and 3% till today.

  1. Colonial legacy

    Again it's importanted to note the the developments in African states during colonization differed as there were different colonial powers. (Tordoff - Government and African policies in African politics in Africa, 4th edn 2002, pg 27) Africa was the last frontier of white colonialism.

  2. Why was slavey abolished in the 19th century?

    presented and bought to the forefront of society's minds by pro-freedom groups such as the Anti-Slavery Society. It was quite surprisingly Britain, who had earned roughly twelve million pounds from the African slave trade in the 18th century and who owned the most productive colonial empire in the world, which gave birth to these organizations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work