• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

. . . the provision of speed cameras is a source of government failure (Extract E, line 20). Using the data and your economic knowledge, evaluate this view.

Extracts from this document...


AQA Economics : Unit 1: Markets and Market Failure ? January 2012 ?. . . the provision of speed cameras is a source of government failure? (Extract E, line 20). Using the data and your economic knowledge, evaluate this view. Government failure occurs when government intervention causes inefficiency in resource allocation and produces an unsatisfactory outcome. Some may argue that speed cameras are a merit good, due to the positive externalities that arise from the use of them. This is because being a merit good they produce positive externalities; their marginal social benefits are greater than their marginal private benefits. Yet, others may argue that speed cameras actually cause more accidents and that they are only used as a source of revenue for the Government which implies speed cameras as a demerit good. Therefore, their marginal social cost is greater than their marginal private cost due to the ?artificial change in behaviour? causing a negative externality. Speed cameras are inevitably in place to make cars not over speed ? some may argue they are there are money raising schemes or as a genuine attempt to save lives. Some people may argue that speed cameras result in positive externalities therefore is not a source of government failure. ...read more.


Therefore, if the provision of speed cameras by the government actually increases the number of accidents on the road, this could be argued as a form of government failure (perhaps through ?policy myopia? for short term fixes on problems with speeding) through the use of them being a demerit good. It states in Extract E how some motoring groups say that ?motorist behaviour? and not speed is the cause of accidents. Extract E states how speed cameras ?artificially change driver behaviour into something they would not normally do?. Therefore, this results in accidents by the driver as a result of the government placing speed cameras and the use of speed cameras actually results in the misallocation of resources causing government failure. This is shown in the negative externalities diagram, where the social cost exceeds the private cost. This shows that socially, the optimum level of production is at Q2 yet is the market fails to include the external costs created from speed cameras (slowing down and speeding up causing accidents) than output will be Q1. Therefore, from a social welfare point, there are too may speed cameras being produced and causing accidents, so they are considered as a demerit good. ...read more.


Therefore, they are spending money wastefully on goods that are not needed. In conclusion, many may argue that speed cameras generate positive externalities from reduced traffic accidents while others may argue that they cause more accidents and therefore cause negative externalities. Perhaps, the question to answer is what their main use is. If their main use is to raise revenue for the government than this may be a source of government failure as the data in extract D shows that the costs of operation for speed cameras are over £2,000 thousand greater than their fine income revenue. However, in my opinion, as stated in Extract E the speed cameras can reduce accidents by up to £30 239 000 in selected areas, so even though their economic costs of operation are greater, the benefits they bring from the lives and money they save (from the external costs with accidents) outweighs this. Extract F states how casualties have almost halved over ‘8 years due to speed cameras’, so the cost saved from not only the money from reduced police and emergency service costs but also lives – with are irreplaceable. Thus, I would argue that the provision of speed cameras is not a source of government failure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Explain the meaning and significance of externalities, how they arise and to what extent ...

    (Parkin, M. 2003). Presence of negative externality is indicated by divergence between private cost and social cost, or private benefit and social benefit. Activities with negative externalities will be carried out at a level, which is too high from a social point of view.

  2. Explain why environmental pollution is regarded as a source of market failure? Evaluate three ...

    Below is a diagram, which illustrates how negative externalities arise: From the diagram one can see that market failure is caused due to the overproduction of goods and services, which aren't accounted for. S1 is the supply curve when only private costs are taken into consideration.

  1. Economics - Data Response January 2006

    become one - for example a merger between two car manufacturers or drinks suppliers. Recent examples of horizontal integration include: Nike and Umbro, Body Shop and L'Oreal, NTL and Telewest which is now known as Virgin Media. The advantages of horizontal integration are that it increases the size of the

  2. what is economics

    holiday to Ibiza o However, there are more likely to be more consumers that are willing to pay over this price o So, when they pay this, they will be providing additional revenue to the producer - above what is the normal expectation * This is what is meant by

  1. Whatever economic system a country adopts, there is always a role for the government ...

    Direct Regulations Direct regulation is where most of a good people are allowed to use is directly limited by government. The purpose of the regulations is to stabilize the running of the national economy.

  2. Micro economics environment - Government intervention

    for the public interest or last regulate them when the government give them laws so they do not act against the public. The overall responsibility for competion policy is in the hands of the secretary of state of trade and industry.

  1. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    As a result, demand is more predictable and the firm does not need to hold as much stock, which in turn, reduces stock holding costs. CONCLUSION ON HOW TESCO AFFECTS BOTH CONSUMERS AND PRODUCERS Many regard Tesco as a great British success story built on a fearsome determination to win in a competitive market, to the great benefit of consumers.

  2. Using the data and your economic knowledge, evaluate the economic case for and against ...

    As downward pressure on the price of new cars leads to an extension of demand for them, the demand for used cars will fall at each and every price level, leading to a price fall to enable the market to clear.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work