• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Threat of Globalisation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Threat of Globalisation The current debate on globalisation is very interesting because it raises such a wide variety of issues. The main concern of the International Forum on Globalisation (IFG) is 'the emergence and growth of corporate trade and banking institutions that are not accountable to democratic processes or even national government'. A full consideration on the consequences of this would lead us beyond the boundaries of economic thought but I will try to highlight what economic theory adds to the discussion and where available, show evidence to support these theories. I will therefore try to address the following questions raised in IFG's position statement. Is there any evidence to suggest that these transnational institutions are growing to the extent that they endanger national economic systems? How is globalisation affecting the returns to different factors of production in the various trading countries? And will globalisation result in the homogenisation of society into a 'global monoculture' (IFG 1995) Anti-globalisation protestors fear that powerful corporations who have no base and are not subject to the rules of any one country are becoming a dominant global force. These transnational companies can move from one region to another taking advantage of cheap labour in India, research grants in the U.S, and lower taxes in Europe all at the same time. ...read more.

Middle

This model assumes that capital and labour in both trading countries are fixed, that they can be split between production of X and Y and that they are homogeneous. Production of X is labour intensive and that of Y is capital intensive. Finally, goods and factor markets are perfectly competitive with no other distortions such as tax. Crucially, for my use of the model in this case, the level of technology in country H and F is identical but their factor endowments are different. That is country H is relatively well endowed with capital and country F is relatively well endowed with labour. It is important to note that relativity allows one country to have higher absolute supplies of both labour and capital. Country H could concentrate completely on production of good X or of good Y, X = f(L + K) Y = g(L + K) but by doing so they would be using resources in production of one good that might be better used in production of the other. Therefore the production possibility frontier is concave. Note also that because country H is well endowed with capital, it can produce more of capital-intensive good Y than labour intensive good X, hence the bias in the curve towards production of Y. ...read more.

Conclusion

Producers in each country are then forced to adjust production to suit the new patterns of demand In questioning globalisation, Hirst and Thompson (1995) investigate the flows of capital around the world and show They suggest that negative consequences of this may include a reduction in the power of governments to control their own affairs. Although this is an important issue, worry from the perspective of an economist is the extreme pursuit of economic development with no consideration of health or ecological issues There are those who assert that globalisation is desirable and use economic theory to show that all countries concerned can benefit from an increase in trade. Alternatively there are those who question whether globalisation is really happening and conclude that there are not as yet trans-national companies who Julius (1990) and Ohmae (1990) claim that numerous TNCs within the developed world go wherever investors see a return on their investments. So during the 1980s a smart TNC would initiate operations in the emerging markets of Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong. When confidence was broken in the 1990s it would withdraw its assets from East Asia and head for safer shores to take advantage of the 'new economy' in the U.S. This leads many to think that by examining capital flows one can identify transnational companies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Explain the Heckscher- Ohlin model of international trade and assess the extent to which ...

    level of exports in all the sectors based on there natural resources, so therefore following the trading patterns of land abundant regions such as that of the Americas rather then the regions of Asia It can be seen that many of Africa's exports are concentrated on unprocessed primary products; conversely in East Asia they are concentrated on manufacturing.

  2. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    Is corruption a profit maximizing strategy? Companies pay bribes to get favored contracts, entry to markets and so on. Otherwise a less competent company may win the deal. However, corruption and bribery causes more damage to business, society, government and economic development are far more than any perceived benefits.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    The new Doha Round, the successor to the Uruguay Round, puts the WTO show back on the road after the disastrous failure of the Seattle Ministerial Conference two years ago. The post-Seattle period witnessed drift and deadlock in the WTO, with bitter and entrenched disagreements among member governments, and an anti-globalisation backlash outside.

  2. To what extent has globalisation been benefical to China's economic growth?

    Likewise, when such a large country increases imports, it drives world prices up. Simple economic theory explains this by supply and demand diagrams of products. If we use aluminium as an example, you can see from the graphs below, if supply of aluminium increase, than prices will fall.

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    Since Somalia attained statehood, private pursuit and fierce competition over the resources of the country has been a marked feature among Somali elite behaviour45. Each member of the governing elite thought that he was in the government, not as a national figure, but as a clan representative.

  2. How the process of Globalisation might have affected the position of labour in industrialized ...

    But increased productivity leads to higher wages. This is confirmed by Figure1 below. The figure shows a strong tendency for the average wage to be higher in countries with higher average labour productivity (relative to the United States). Figure 1 Average Labour Productivity and Average Wage in Manufacturing, 1995 14 !Debate!

  1. Free essay

    Globalisation and changing career patterns

    One industry hit hard by this in was the British Coal industry. 3.1.1. The British Coal Industry The movement of industries away from the UK has been highly visible since the 1980's. The collapse of both the British Coal mining & steel industries can be attributed to the fact that

  2. Many examples of Companies working globally are: Nike, Adidas and other companies which may ...

    ideas and information to travel and spread around the world, very fast and very easily. Freedom of worldwide companies is another reason for globalisation. Trade levels between different parts of the world, which can be through LEDC's and MEDC's are increasing rapidly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work