• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

This article review is done for the course of Trends in Global Marketing Strategies. The purpose of this work is to analyse Michael Porter' s model of national diamond and study the determinants affecting the competitive advantage of nations.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Article Review Michael Porter: Competitive Advantage of Nations Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Reviews of the Articles 1 2.1 Competitive Advantage of Nations by Michael Porter 1 2.2 Porter's Competitive Advantage of Nations: an assessment of Robert Grant 5 2.3 Internationalising Porter's Diamond by John Dunning 6 2.4 The Double Diamond Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience by Alan Rugman and Joseph D'Cruz 7 2.5 Porter's Competitive Advantage revisited by Nicholas J. O�Shaughnessy 8 2.6 Assessing Porter's Framework for National Advantage: the Case of Turkey by �zlem �z 9 3 Synthesis 10 3.1 Overview 10 3.2 Diamond of National Advantage 11 3.3 Model Modifications 12 3.4 Conclusion 13 References 1 Introduction This article review is done for the course of Trends in Global Marketing Strategies. The purpose of this work is to analyse Michael Porter' s model of national diamond and study the determinants affecting the competitive advantage of nations. First we summarise Porter's article and after that five other articles closely related to the model. In this work we focus on the development of the model from the early 90' s. 2 Reviews of the Articles 2.1 Competitive Advantage of Nations by Michael Porter In the article "Competitive Advantage of Nations" Michael Porter represents his model, which goal is to clarify the determinants of national competitive advantage. The writer refers to the model as the national diamond. The model is based on four country-specific determinants and two external variables. This framework was developed through studying competitive performance among 10 countries each evolving several industrial cases. The first of the country specific determinants is factor conditions, which mean the nation's factors of production, such as skilled labour or infrastructure. According to the author the most important factors of production are those that involve sustained and heavy investment and are specialized. He also says that nations can succeed in industries where they are particularly good at factor creation. ...read more.

Middle

Dunning suggests that the national diamond should be replaced with supernational diamond because of the increasing integration between countries. In this case, national political borders become meaningless and the competitive advantage of a country can be influenced by factors outside a country's home diamond. The principle is the same, but the geographical constituency has to be established on different criteria when taking about the supernational diamond. 2.4 The Double Diamond Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience by Alan Rugman and Joseph D'Cruz The point of view in this article is that Porter's diamond framework explains the success of US, Japanese, and EC-based multinational corporations, but it is not applicable to small, open, trading economies. Rugman and D'Cruz show that Porter's home country diamond does not explain Canada's international competitiveness. Also some other researchers have noticed this problem when trying to apply Porter's model to e.g. New Zealand, and Korea. Rugman and D'Cruz argue that the over 90 % of the world's nations potentially cannot be modelled by the Porter diamond. The authors suggest that substantial modifications of the Porter framework are required to analyze the nature of Canada's successful resource-based multinationals, foreign subsidiaries and institutional arrangements, such as the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement. In order to do this Rugman and D'Cruz present a new "double diamond" framework. In this model Rugman and D'Cruz propose that since Canada in already economically highly integrated with U.S., it should use "The North American" diamond when trying to determine or improve Canada's international competitiveness. This means that Canadians should view the U.S. market as a home market, not just an export market. Canadian owned multinationals have competitive advantages derived from attributes of the U.S. or other foreign diamonds, rather than the Canadian diamond alone. It is also said in the article that each country needs to set its own home-country diamond against the relevant triad diamond. In general, most Asia-Pacific nations will set theirs against Japan. ...read more.

Conclusion

Cultures cannot be ranked and they cannot be valued only on the basis of economical standards. The values of human beings come from the cultural background and history of the country. These aspects determine which issues in a country are being emphasized and admired. For instance, Germans and Japans have faced militarism in the past. That may have created discipline labour force and highly technical demands industries. These aspects can be seen as competitive advantage of these nations. 3.4 Conclusion When we think about the factors that affect competitive advantage of nation, inevitable conclusion is that the model becomes wide and complex. After Porter has published his work of "National Diamond", several authors have proposed that new determinants should be added to the model. The reason for that is that the effects of the determinants in Porter' s model and the relationships between them are not black-and-white. Some of the effects are self-explanatory and there are several exceptions in many cases. This arises the question how well Porter's model or any other model altogether can be applied to all situations. There have been attempts to apply the model in the practise in several countries. In some cases the model works and gives good framework when trying to determinate competitive advantage of some nations, but in some other cases it seems to fail in this attempt. For instance, developing countries are not taken into account in Porter' s research. O'Shaughnessy (1996) argues in his article that Porter' s model is specific to the West. On the other hand, there is a recent study where Porter's model has been quite successfully adapted to explain competitive advantage of developing country (Turkey). The study shows that Porter' s model can be applied to analyse the sources of advantages or disadvantages in an uncompetitive industry. As a conclusion, we can say that the model' s ability to analyse competitive advantage of nation is case-specific. There is indeed a need for wider empirical research, before we can be sure that using this kind of model can assure competitive advantage for nations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    International Business Strategy - Case Study on Unilever

    4 star(s)

    Given each country has issues inherited from its historical background, variations in practices and cultural impact, it is impossible to have two identical economies. However, the macro-environments of developing countries proved possible similarities, which in fact make strategic planning for global operations more efficient.

  2. Is the United Nations a success or failure?

    (Number 1 failure). They aimed for the council to be given authority over every member for calling for collective action. But, as the UN was unable to have an army of its own, it meant that it would not be able to stamp its authority on the other countries.

  1. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    Now the developing countries are enough self sufficient and they want to preserve their Intellectual property resources and for that the PCT system is the best route to protect the inventions in various places. India is and will remain to be the one of the countries where the high technology

  2. Feminist approaches to the study of international relations theory

    they were invisible; then to look at the present time where women have jobs, have highly regarded roles in government and are not the stereotypical housewives they once were, then it must be said that the contribution of feminism to international relations is quite huge.

  1. Flower Industry in Netherlands

    Rotterdam seaport is ranked as top 3 busiest seaports in world. * Abundant natural gas The total production of natural gas in Netherlands is twice the consumption of domestic demand. Besides the condition that supply exceeds demand, government intentionally controls the natural gas price in order to maintain competitiveness of some industries.

  2. What are the main determinants of industrial location?

    Assuming zero trade costs, the spatial distribution of demand only affects the patterns of trade, but not the location of production. Assuming trade costs and evenly distributed demand over space, then the locational dispersion of activity will correlate positively with the level of trade costs.

  1. "Legal control of multinational corporations: problems and prospects".

    Milton Friedman went as far as to pronounce that the social responsibility of business is to increase profits, subject only to respect for some laws and some ill-defined ethical principles23. This sentiment is out of touch with current attitudes, however no one could reasonably assume to burden corporations with an overarching responsibility for national welfare.

  2. Explain the evolution and characteristics of the debt problems of LDCs. In the light ...

    while insisting that LDCs not only open their markets up, but make their exports more competitive through structural adjustment?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work