• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This essay compares examples of real world economics found in three studies written in 1996 with examples of commonly taught 'textbook' economics to come to the conclusion that some monopolies have displayed lower prices, an

Extracts from this document...


Introduction. Throughout economics, it is a time honoured assumption that monopolies are theoretically less efficient than competitive counterparts. I will show, through the comparison of examples of theory and through examples of real world economic conditions how it is that in some particular cases monopoly can be shown to be more efficient than competitive behaviour. This essay compares examples of real world economics found in three studies written in 1996 with examples of commonly taught 'textbook' economics to come to the conclusion that some monopolies have displayed lower prices, an absence of adverse selection, and other beneficial characteristics than competitive firms could possibly do, given that these firms operate in the same type of markets. Background: competition and price. To begin with, a definition of 'competition' is required in order to approach the answer from the correct angle. Competition: The situation when anybody who wants to buy or sell has a choice of possible suppliers or customers. With perfect competition there are so many suppliers and customers, with such good contact between them, that all traders ignore the effects of their own supplies or purchases on the market, and act as price-takers, able to buy or sell any quantity at a price which they [alone] cannot influence. Such intense competition is rather unusual in real life. The more usual condition is monopolistic or imperfect competition, with a limited number of buyers or sellers. In this case buyers or, more usually, sellers realize that the amount they can trade is affected by the price they offer. ...read more.


and partially as a competitive market (in other areas). The main arguments that von Ungern-Sternberg has are that the state monopolies charged lower 'premia' (essentially prices) for similar products to the competitive companies' products. His reasons here are that the state run monopolies do not need to spend as much money on advertising and administration as the competitively run companies. The conclusion is that the state monopolies 'outperform'12 the private sector firms. von Ungern-Sternberg's paper, whilst suggesting that "the state run monopolies are considerably cheaper than the private insurance companies"13, also shows that there is a lack of choice for the consumer. Whilst there are overall lower premia on the state side, there also exists a lack of choice due to the state companies being "single product companies".14 This lack of choice is not necessarily a bad thing. In the paper, von Ungern-Sternberg shows how less competition may benefit consumers through the removal of all competition in order to provide these low price levels. Where innovation is concerned, we should be aware that of all markets, housing insurance markets have a level of innovation that is surprisingly low. So low that we can call such markets "static markets" - and this is apparent from over the past 100 years.15 Lastly, what would letting the private companies compete against the state run monopolies mean for the consumer? Firstly, this would only work in a 'situation of complete information'16 As we have seen, it would mean a raising of premia prices and, due to the static situation of insurance markets it would not mean any increase in the quality or range of products available. ...read more.


Overall then, we have shown that competition is not necessarily beneficial for the consumers. Bibliography. Begg, D., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R., Economics, (British Edit.), McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, England (UK), 1984 Frank, R., Microeconomics and Behaviour, (International Edit.), McGraw-Hill, New York (USA), 2003. Frank, R., and Bernanke, B., Principles of Economics, (Second Edit.), McGraw-Hill, New York (USA), 2004 Frech III, H.E., & J.C. Samprane, Jr., 1980, "The welfare loss of excess non-price competition: The case of property-liability insurance regulation." The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.23, pp.429-440. Finsinger, J., The performance of property-liability insurance firms under the German regulatory system, Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswirtschaft, The Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 139, pp.473-489, 1983. Varian, H., Intermediate Microeconomics, A Modern Approach, Fifth Edit., W.W. Norton & Co., London, New York, 1999. Online Bibliography. Epple, K., & Sch�fer, R., The transition from monopoly to competition: The case of housing insurance in Baden-Wtirttemberg, European Economic Review, pp.1123-1131, 1996. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V64-3VW8NC3-29-1&_cdi=5804&_user=1026342&_orig=browse&_coverDate=04%2F30%2F1996&_sk=999599996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlb-zSkzV&md5=3186e7326828b554e15af278a1f1c569&ie=/sdarticle.pdf Saturday, November 26, 2005 Peltzman, S., The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, No. 4., 1975, pp. 677-726. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-3808%28197508%2983%3A4%3C677%3ATEOASR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U, Saturday, November 26, 2005 Felder, S., Fire insurance in Germany: A comparison of price-performance between state monopolies and competitive regions, European Economic Review, vol.40, pp.1133-1141, 1996. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V64-3VW8NC3-2B-1&_cdi=5804&_user=1026342&_orig=browse&_coverDate=04%2F30%2F1996&_sk=999599996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlb-zSkzV&md5=c7912380824fdba223cb4fdc0029d8ad&ie=/sdarticle.pdf Saturday, November 26, 2005 von Ungern-Sternberg, T., The limits of competition: Housing insurance in Switzerland, European Economic Review, vol.40, pp.1111-21, 1996. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V64-3VW8NC3-28-1&_cdi=5804&_user=1026342&_orig=browse&_coverDate=04%2F30%2F1996&_sk=999599996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlb-zSkzV&md5=34dc6c8149c1da83eb7d4edfd25243ae&ie=/sdarticle.pdf Saturday, November 26, 2005 John Black, "Competition", A Dictionary of Economics, Oxford University Press, 2002, Oxford Reference Online, Oxford University Press, http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t19.e486 16 November 2005 The Wall Street Journal, December 23, 1974, in Schenk, R., Insurance, Saint Joseph's College, Indiana, http://ingrimayne.saintjoe.edu/econ/RiskExclusion/Risk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. "Discuss and evaluate the proposition that perfect competition is a more efficient market structure ...

    Second, monopolies are inefficient because the resources used to maintain the monopoly could be use more effectively in other places. The opportunity cost of maintaining a monopoly is high. A monopoly rent seeking behaviour is the use of political power and its accompanying resources to achieve or maintain a monopoly in order to gain the monopoly profits4.

  2. What is a Monopoly?

    The potential economic and social benefits of monopoly The possible economic benefits of monopoly power suggest that the government and the competition authorities should be careful about intervening directly in markets and try to break up a monopoly. Market power can bring advantages both to the firms themselves and also

  1. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    same industry under perfect competition which is incompatible with substantial economies of scale. Producing with lower cost can be also reached if a monopolist can use partial supernormal profits research and development and investment even re-investment. "It may not have the same incentive to become efficient as the perfectly competitive

  2. In economics we refer to these two acts as tax evasion and tax avoidance. ...

    Equilibrium is found at the point where MC + MR (profit maximization point), with an output of OA, while price equal OB. If we assume that a specific tax of u is imposed, the immediate effect is to shift the MC to MC'.

  1. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    The cost structure of a firm is illustrated in figure 1.1 bellow. Costs are measured on the vertical axis and level of the firm's output on the horizontal axis. Fixed costs have to be paid regardless of the level of sales and are depicted by a straight horizontal line.

  2. Explain three reasons why labour markets may be imperfectly competitive

    Therefore, it is usually the case where jobs which do not need specialist skills (such as working as a cashier) earn less than accountants, the accountants have had to undergo exams and as a result, there are less people able to work in this industry and so due to the

  1. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    The games theory is a theory often used to analyse interdependence among oligopolistic firms. A game occurs when there are two or more interacting decision-takers (players) and each decision or combination of decisions involves a particular outcome (pay-off.) The fate (or the pay-off)

  2. What criteria should be applied in judging whether monopolies are acting in public interest? ...

    As illustrated, monopoly will be producing as excess capacity most of the time and this represent a waste to the society as costs are not minimised and resources are not efficiently allocated. It is by fluke if the OQ1 output level correspond to the minimum point of the AC curve.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work