• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Did Imperial Concerns Guide British Foreign Policy Between 1890- 1907?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Did Imperial Concerns Guide British Foreign Policy Between 1890- 1907? When answering this question it is important to note that the significance and value of this essay is great. This essay will help us to understand the climate and reasons to how the First World War broke out and also how politics, which were carried out at the beginning of the twentieth century, laid the foundations to the way in which foreign policy is carried out today. By outlining a few key terms needed for this essay, the task of answering this question will be less complicated. This question regards the issue of foreign policy; this is a set of policies employed by a country pertaining to international affairs. The issue of 'imperial concerns' which this essay will address, relates to the concerns a country has, corresponding to it empire or sovereign. By answering this essay question imperial concerns of the great powers in the world must be analysed, international conflict due to imperial motivation will be looked at the position of Britain and Germany in world affairs and their relationship, Anglo-German antagonism and their economic rivalry must also be studied to successfully answer this question. Between 1890- 1907 three key figures were at the forefront of international foreign policy pertaining to imperial concerns. The first of these was Lord Salisbury who dominated British politics and foreign policy during this period, as Michael Lynch stated, "...foreign policy in late Victorian Britain was dominated by the conservative leader Lord Salisbury. He made foreign affairs his speciality"; Salisbury also took a pragmatic approach concerning the empire again as Michael Lynch states along with Gladstone he "shared the view that Britain was a declining force in the world and that therefore it would be unwise for it to attempt an expansionist foreign policy." He also "tended to share Joseph Chamberlain's economic understanding of imperialism. ...read more.


(Derrick Murphy), by analysing the trade relationship between the two countries we will be able to determine how imperial concerns were affecting, Britain's 'economic foreign policy, with Germany. When describing the 'trade relationship' between these two countries it is apt to say, that both were heavily reliant on each other, in 1890 British imports from Germany totalled a 26 million pounds and British exports to Germany 19.2 million pounds, in the year 1905 the British imports from Germany had doubled to 53.8 million pounds and the British exports from Germany had increased by one and a half times to 29.7 million. Although the exports from Britain to Germany were not as dramatic as that from Germany to Britain; it can be recognised that Germany was heavily dependent on the British Empire for materials "Britain had remained the leading market for German exports throughout this entire period" (Paul Kennedy). Germanys percentage of world trade was growing fast; Britain's 'mature economy' had lost six percent of world trade from 1880 to 1913 where Germanys economy had grown by three percent. "Germany was able, by utilising steam, electrical and rail power, to achieve growth rates which were higher than those of a 'mature economy' like Britain's [...] Germany's industrial expansion was, in many respects, in the more advanced and qualitatively superior sectors of the economy" (Paul Kennedy). The 'trade rivalry' between the two countries was that a long list of particular industries and firms felt themselves in a struggle with their British or German counter parts, their were complaints on either side that each had an unfair advantage however a great number of these complaints were from Britain concentrating on the 'unfair' German Tariff system, in a report by the Tariff commission in sectors such as agricultural machinery trade within Germany from Britain 'Duties had gradually close the market' from heavy taxing from the Germans. Britain's policy, had till then been, naively, one of free trade however As Andrew Thompson comments "Just as one individual- Richard Cobden- ...read more.


The main causes of this entente were war and domestic tensions leaving Russia very venerable. The main provisions of this entente were: Persia was to be divided into three zones, a Russian zone adjacent to her frontier, a buffer zone and a British zone in the south- east covering the Indian Border. Russia and Britain both agreed to refrain from influence in both Afghanistan and Tibet; also agreeing to respect each other's spheres of influence. The British were willing to agree to the entente, which neutralised Russian ambitions in India- 'the Jewel of Britain's Imperial Crown' Conclusively British imperial concerns did affect their foreign policy between 1890- 1907. Firstly, in 1890 the 'African agreements' illustrated this fact greatly, not wanting to become involved in colonial disputes Britain initiated these agreements. Trade relations with Germany also spurned imperial concerns to affect foreign policy with the formation of Joseph Chamberlains Tariff Reform League. Colonial disputes and agreements with Germany also outwardly displayed how imperial concerns affected British foreign policies, with agreements such as the Portuguese Colonies agreement of 1898, concerns that the British empire would create economic and military problems for Britain, any potential conflicts and problems were solved fast. The series of agreements and ententes came in 1902- 1907 with a change in Foreign Secretary who was keen to initiate, and 'de-isolate' Britain from other countries, The benefits from these series of these ententes were great with the Anglo- Japanese alliance leading to an entente with both France and Russia, creating tight relations, which would become stronger during the first world war. These imperial concerns which affected foreign policy within Britain can be regarded as "preclusive imperialism- annexing territory, not because it was valuable economically, but merely to forestall a rival." (John Lowe) Britain realising that other countries were employing 'preclusive' imperialism, understood that rivalry could escalate into Europe, employing a defensive foreign policy, to preserve their empire and protect their interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Why was Britain the First Industrial Nation?

    Miles of track-covered Britain, and even London to Glasgow was linked by the popular transportation. In 1852 the results of the investment in railways was apparent, the railways offered more speed than the canals, this ensured that trade was working at its fastest.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    is essentially a positive-sum game, not an engine of marginalisation and exclusion. This is what Adam Smith has in mind when he says that "in civilised society (man) stands at all times in need of the co-operation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to

  1. Was late Victorian Imperialism purely economic in character?

    Britain for the first time when considering formal control of a province, were aware of the very real problem of a third power. These changes in the world had created this era of 'New imperialism' and over the coming decades the world watched as Europe embarked on the scramble for Africa and Empires.

  2. To what extent was Pitt responsible for the national revival after 1783?

    take the risk to try to bring goods into Britain and more people would be paying taxes of goods brought into the Britain. Another policy that helped national revival was the system of bonded warehouses.

  1. To what extent was 'blood and iron' the MAIN reason for the unification of ...

    Looking at statistics we can see that in 1846, Germany produced only 3.2m tons of coal, whereas in 1871, nearly 30m tons of coal were produced. The significance of this is that the economic expansion enabled the creation of a strong, powerful Prussia.

  2. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    wanted a part of it * Exploration of sea routes around the Cape of Good Hope brought the French to it in 1529, the English in 1580 and the Dutch in 1595 * Between these four powers, a competition for the Africa's trade developed * Britain founded the East India

  1. What accounts for the fact that Britain was the richest country in Europe in ...

    growth had averaged 3-4% per annum; agriculture enjoyed a similar 'Golden age' known as high farming and abroad Britannia ruled the seas and the empire brought untold riches to the British homeland. Britain had the world's most democratically progressive governments and the legislation brought forward by government made British society one of the most dynamic and zestful societies of Europe.

  2. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    attainting food for its population. Aid: In absolute terms, Sub-Saharan Africa's debt is small69. This explains the lack of interest in the West in dealing with its economic repercussions; in global terms its debt is so modest it is a threat to no-one except the Africans themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work