• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the government budget/statement reflect current government priorities?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far does the budget reflect current government priorities? "Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidise it" - Ronald Reagan In my coursework I shall be discovering what the annual government budget is, what it is spent on and why, correlating this with current priorities. I shall be investigating to what extent does the governments' expenditure reflect on these current government priorities i.e. the amount spent on defence, the education sector and social protection. I shall be mostly using secondary research, through using websites and maybe books. I will compare spending from previous budgets to the current one and find out where changes, if any, have been made. Through figuring out where the money is spent, I can discover what the main priorities are but not neglecting the fact that some sectors are larger and undoubtedly require money being spent, e.g. Healthcare and public order & safety. Government expenditure is vital for the efficient running of the economy. The need for much of the government expenditure arises from the facts that some goods will not be provided at all by a free market economy (public goods) and that others will be under-provided (merit goods). It is spending on these goods that accounts for a large proportion of government spending (health, education, police and defence, among others). Some government expenditure is aimed at providing a safety net for the less well off in society and ensuring that they are able to survive in the event that they lose their jobs or have insufficient income. The department that deals with the allocation of most of this money is the Department of Social Security. Other government expenditure is aimed at various areas that may be considered important in a developed economy - providing a transport infrastructure, supporting the work of local government and servicing any debts that may have been accumulated in the past. ...read more.

Middle

This could signify that the environment is not classed as such a high priority; although relating to my earlier point of stating that the some areas are larger and therefore require more money suggests that it is not less of a priority. However, it could also be due to the fact that the government believes that protection of the population and the healthcare too are more of a priority than preserving the environment. So it can be looked at in both ways. I myself believe that the government thinks the environment is less of a priority and therefore less money should be invested there. Healthcare in Britain is different to that in most other countries in the way that we have adopted a system called the National Health Service. The NHS is paid for through our taxes and so therefore offers healthcare for everyone in the UK and securing the provision of comprehensive, high quality care for all those who need it, regardless of their ability to pay or where they live or their age. The aims set out by the Department of Health are to: * Supporting activity at national level to protect, promote and improve the nation's health; * Securing responsive social care and child protection for those who lack the support they need. The key objectives for pursuing these aims are to: * To reduce the incidence of avoidable illness, disease and injury in the population. * To treat people with illness, disease or injury quickly, effectively and on the basis of need alone. * To enable people, who are unable to perform essential activities of daily living, including those with chronic illness, disability or terminal illness, to live as full and normal lives as possible. * To maximise the social development of children within stable family settings. These aims and objectives are generic to most years of the NHS but as research and new technologies develop the spending must increase to match demands of the population. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sometimes spending money on one area will directly affect another positively anyway such as improving education will also improve employment and training. As a general rule the government's role is to keep inflation low, keep unemployment low, balance in international trade and maintain a flourishing and prospering economy. The government has been investing large amounts of money into training schemes and other projects that have ultimately led to the unemployment rate falling to 5.2% in February 2008. The claimant count was 793,500 in February 2008, down 2,800 over the previous month and down 126,500 over the year. This is the lowest figure since June 1975. The claimant count has now fallen for 17 consecutive months. This shows that the investments into training and education has led to the fall in unemployment which proves my theory that spending in other sectors subsequently helps others. One could just quite plainly say that the government spending does not reflect current government priorities or otherwise if it did then there would be a perfect economy because the money spent would be used to it's full potential in exactly the right places, doing exactly the right thing; lowering unemployment, improving healthcare, lowering inflation etc. I believe that the difference in the previous budget and the current one describes the extent to which the budget reflects current government priorities better than the looking at the budget itself as the current priorities will determine how much spending will increase in each sector and those with the larger increases (after taking into account inflation) show that they are more of a priority than those with little or no increase. Generally, the government invests the money into areas which is sees to be crucial for the future, so dependent on the priorities, the budget is spent taking into account these and areas of needed development; so if it isn't spent directly reflecting government priorities, it has taken these into account and spent it most wisely considering areas that need improvement but are not always priorities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The aim of this essay is to discuss the relevance of John Keynes to ...

    5 star(s)

    Beyond this point closer to marker 4 the economy begins to slump and there is little or no growth. The cause of fluctuation in growth of the economy is stated to be a result of variations in the growth of aggregate demand.

  2. What are the government objectives? Explain why each is important and how the government ...

    First of all devaluing the pound will make imported goods more expensive and exports cheaper for foreigners. There are two ways at looking at the consequences of devaluation, through looking at the price effects, the elasticity approach, or through looking at the income effects, the absorption approach.

  1. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    Tax Revenue (CBR) 510000 510000 580000 Direct Taxes 161100 161500 181900 Income Tax 154200 154638 174362 Capital Value Tax 700 600 650 W. W. Tax 6200 6262 6888 Indirect Taxes 348900 348500 398100 Customs Duties 78100 86600 103200 Sales Tax 223100 218400 249200 Federal Excise 47700 43500 45700 b )

  2. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    for economic growth where producing more income is not matched by the extra output. For this pure theory to be true three assumptions have to be made: 1. All labour is equally efficient 2. All labour is completely mobile both in the occupational and geographic sense 3.

  1. Unemployment Report.

    Since 1993 the underlying rate of inflation has been stable and the unemployment rate has fallen steadily. There has undoubtedly been an improvement in the trade off between unemployment and inflation resulting from a reduction in the natural rate of unemployment and the NAIRU.

  2. Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives ...

    In the 1970s and 1980s, many semi-skilled and unskilled male workers were caught in the poverty trap: taking on a low paid job would lead them to lose as much or even more in state benefits than they would gain in ages after tax.

  1. Various Macro-Economic Questions and answers

    What is ?the short run? when discussing aggregate supply? What does a short run aggregate supply curve look like? What does a long run aggregate supply curve look like? Why? Explain the factors that will cause a shift in the aggregate supply curve. Shifts in the SRAS curve can be caused by the following factors Changes in unit labour

  2. Discuss the view that governments of countries with large budget deficits should take measures ...

    It would also make the country more attractive to FDI as on paper the country would seem a healthier investment due to a stronger government grip on finances. This would help to set up more projects around the country helping to increase employment and so the national output of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work