• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using transport examples throughout, explain the impact of market structure on economic efficiency and the ability of firms to set prices and make profits

Extracts from this document...


Using transport examples throughout, explain the impact of market structure on economic efficiency and the ability of firms to set prices and make profits Economic efficiency is the use of resources in such a way as to maximise the production of goods and services. The structure of a market, its profitability, prices and output can affect its economic efficiency. There are four main types of efficiency to consider; productive efficiency, allocative efficiency, dynamic efficiency and X-inefficiency. Productive efficiency is at its maximum when the level of production is at the minimum of the Average Cost curve. Productive efficiency is at its maximum when price is equal to marginal cost. Dynamic efficiency is through the generation of abnormal profits (AR>AC), that are invested for future development. X-inefficiency is when a firm is not operating at minimum cost, due to organisational slack. Using the market structure of perfect competition as an example, there are many small firms producing homogenous goods, thus it is fragmented as opposed to concentrated. In the transport industry the local coach travel market represents the model of perfect competition quite well. No one firm can set of affect the price level, and so the firms are referred to as 'price-takers'. If a firm decided to sell their good or service at a price higher than that of others, consumers would simply demand from another supplier due to the homogenous nature of the good or service. ...read more.


Perfect competition is merely a theory and so does not exist in practice, however within the transport market structure there are examples of highly competitive markets, such as the local coach travel market, which is highly fragmented, provides a homogenous product and service, there are many participants (buyers and sellers), low barriers to entry and exit, there is high knowledge of market conditions and the firms' objectives are to maximise profits. This in turn means that compared to less competitive markets, there is higher output within the market, and the price is lower than other, less competitive markets. These less competitive markets can be seen as 'monopolies' or 'oligopolies'. Monopolies typically have characteristics converse of those of perfect competition. A monopoly arises when one firm is a single seller of a good or service, there are no substitutes for the good, and there are high barriers to entry into the market. This market power and dominance is gained through brand loyalty, high barriers to entry such as sunk costs, economies of scale, regulation or control of resources. Compared to the 'price-takers' of perfect competition, monopolistic firms are 'price-makers' and so can set prices as they wish. For this reason the demand curve in a monopoly is downward sloping compared to horizontal in perfect competition. Monopolistic firms are constantly able to make abnormal profit, whether it is in the short or long term. ...read more.


We assume that there are, high barriers to entry to an oligopolistic market due to large-scale production and strong branding, price rigidity due to the risks of competitive pricing and thus non-price competition to gain market share, firm's LRAC curves are 'L-shaped' rather than 'U-shaped' because the MES extends over a large range of output. The 'kinked-demand' theory suggests that if one firm in an oligopolistic market increases price then other firms will not follow because the level of output decreases far too greatly relatively and they will be able to sell more, due to the asymmetric PED, however if one firm lowers price, others will follow suit and also decrease their prices so as not to lose market share. When firms within an oligopoly compete through non-collusive behaviour, the market behaviour becomes very much like that of perfect competition, with increased productivity and lower prices, meaning increase productive efficiency and allocative efficiency, with also lower X-inefficiency through lower costs and profit maximisation, thus less organisational slack. Overall we can say that as a market structure becomes less efficient, the firms within that market are able to set prices and make profits with more ease. With high efficiency, normal profits and hardly any ability to set prices in competitive markets, and low efficiency, abnormal profits and the ability to manipulate the market selling price in markets that have little or low competition with a high n-firm concentration ratio. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. What are the implications for economic welfare of a market structure changing from perfect ...

    from price discrimination. Moreover, the monopoly captures the consumer surplus for itself. The consumer surplus has shrunk to the small gray area, The above I have mentioned is imperfect price discrimination. When the price discrimination becomes perfect, the monopoly is more efficient than before.

  2. "Discuss and evaluate the proposition that perfect competition is a more efficient market structure ...

    Examples of this are local public utilities such as telephone, gas water and electric power. Also it is sometimes cheaper to produce two related products in a single firm rather than in two separate firms. This are called Economies of scope.

  1. Evaluate the role played by barriers to entry in the long run

    Monopolistic competition - A monopolistic market is one that trades with similar goods that are slightly different to the competitors giving the consumer a choice; better quality goods at a higher price, or lower (possible own branded goods) at a cheaper price.

  2. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    curve, the intersection of those two curves will give the market price, which the purely competitive or price-taking firm must accept. This definition of a competitive firm is obviously idealised, for in one sense the individual firm has to set prices.

  1. In this essay, I would like to take a view at the implications for ...

    demand curve because if it charges a higher price, the demand would decrease. It can maximize its profit at Qm where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Then, if we put the equilibrium of the industry under perfect competition and monopoly with a same marginal cost curve together, the situation can be shown in Figure4.

  2. In this essay, I will analyze and compare the two extremes of market structure ...

    The firm is a monopolist and it owns the unique resource. A pure or absolute monopolist is a one-firm industry. A single firm is the only producer of a given product or sole supplier of a service. The monopolist's product is unique in the sense that there are no good or close substitutes available.

  1. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    the only way to compete is through product differentiation. This is achieved by constant innovation, and by incessant advertising. Out of the four market structures (discussed on pages 1 and 2), oligopoly is most likely to develop the innovations that: * Advance the level of technology * Expand production capabilities * Promote economic growth * Lead to higher living standards.

  2. Economy and how it affects my business selling tables

    Also the rate of supply might be high because maybe in the future the inflation can rise therefore the cost of manufacturing will be less cheap. 4. Low tax rates can increase the money you have for production, marketing, salaries and raw materials.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work