• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the principles and objectives of British Foreign policy 1792 - 1841?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the principles and objectives of British Foreign policy 1792 - 1841? There were five basic principles behind British foreign policy 1792 - 1841; they were naval power and supremacy. The trading interests for Britain and the economic position of Britain. Thirdly the balance of power and maintaining the peace in Europe, making sure that peace and stability were kept in Europe. The Atlantic Slave trade was also a major principle for the foreign secretaries. Lastly was the question of Liberty and moral issues. These formed the backbone for the policies of British foreign secretaries during the time of 1792 to 1841. However there was one principle that is not stated which all other policies were a part of, that was the security of Britain. This was the up most priority of any foreign secretary. We can see this through the policies and these policies remained the mainly the same for all the secretaries, even up to today. In the middle of the 19th century Britannia did rule the waves and Britain's naval supremacy was unchallenged, this allowed other policies to be carried out, such as the slave trade, however the navy had duties of it's own and it was vital to Britain's security and progress. Castlereagh used the navy several times in the Napoleonic wars as part of a defensive but also aggressive force. ...read more.

Middle

Canning who openly stated that Britain wanted and was trading with Latin America followed this on; this was the outcome after an incident with America over who was to get the trade. Which resulted in the Monroe Doctrine. Canning, who had not felt the same about peaceful relations with America had to persuade Latin America to trade and so secured Britain's trade with other countries than in Europe. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807, and was keen to see that all slave trade would be stopped, the Atlantic Slave trade became a focus for policy to stop this trade, it was felt that it was immoral and wrong to have slaves and in order to stop slavery firstly the slave trade must be stopped. In order to achieve this the navy was used and the superiority was taken advantage of, all British naval ships had the power to stop and search and ship crossing the Atlantic in order to stop the trade of slaves. This was first implemented by Castlereagh but followed on r. There was much objection from countries that still relied on slaves such as Spain and France. However this policy was carried on and remained in order to stop the trade. The balance of power was an especially important principle for Britain, during Castlereagh's era, France had always been the main threat and at the treaty of Vienna he was careful not to give France too much power back and to try and restrict them. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the Greek independence, although Britain partly supported the Greek cause it could not fully support it, as it would eventually mean a change in the balance of power and Russia would be allowed to expand and Turkey would collapse. Britain did indirectly help Italian unification later on; again this was helping a constitutional country. Throughout all the main principles we can see that several are linked together and often follow the same principle. The navy is essential to Britain's success and being able to carry many policies out. The balance of power was essential for stability and trade, while at the same time Britain was starting trade with other countries. Peace seemed a large concern for Britain and liberty. However most importantly of these factors and one that all other policies were based on was the idea of British security. That was the main point for a foreign secretary to make sure that Britain maintained it position and remained strong. It was essential that Britain should not be threatened, thus the intervention in Portugal. We could say that if security had not been the main principle then many of the polices would have been different and the shape of history would have changed. Yet the job of a foreign secretary was to preserve Britain's interests and security. Therefore all policies must be based around that idea. Silas Bingley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    with national patent office which will be appointed by PCT authorities and will act as PCT 'receiving office'. This will save the time, and also postal formalities too. Now if researcher has to assume the situation where the India is not the contracting state of PCT, then what will happen?

  2. Colonialism and Colonies.

    Economists, particularly British economist Adam Smith, argued against government regulation of the economy. Smith asserted that trade with a colony was no more profitable than with an independent country. He argued that political strategy might justify colonialism, but economics could not.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    The bad news is that very little progress has been made in Geneva since the round started. There are several reasons for this state of affairs, some short-term, others more worryingly long-term.

  2. To What Extent Did Imperial Concerns Guide British Foreign Policy Between 1890- 1907?

    The high point of this 2nd colonial empire was from 1890-1914 As John Lowe and Robert Pearce state in there book Rivalry and Accord "France herself became a great imperial power in this period with extensive colonial possessions in both Africa and Asia."

  1. Why was slavey abolished in the 19th century?

    With pressure building on the British government to act though after this, reviewing the case of slavery became more important. Economically, they had to decide whether it was worth keeping any longer. Adam Smith's 'The Wealth of Nations' published in 1776, contains the view that slave-worked economies were not financially

  2. Hong Kong inaugurated Sir Henry Pottinger as its first governor in August 1841

    This trafficing, it should be stressed, was a criminal activity after 1836, but the British traders generously bribed Canton officials in order to keep the opium traffic flowing. The effects on Chinese society were devestating. In fact, there are few periods in Chinese history that approach the early nineteenth century in terms of pure human misery and tragedy.

  1. Recent Trends in Indian Foreign trade

    is different from market to market. Considering a country as separate market, one assumes different market characteristics there. These differences are accentuated due to the existence of government controls and regulations. In countries like India and U.S.A., These differences in market patterns may be found from state to state.

  2. Porters Five Forces

    - Do you have all the distribution channels locked-up? - Can you easily differentiate yourself from the competition? - Can you significantly benefit from the economies of scale? Another good chart addresses your competitive advantage. Rate the Bargaining Power of Suppliers Suppliers are not usually seen as a competitive force, but they should be.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work