• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalization is without doubt it is a "buzz" word of the time - it is a word that seems to be constantly mentioned in the news on the television or radio. But what does living in a "globalized" world really mean? As a starting point this essay will attempt to interpret its meaning by applying four main theories and using these theories to discuss the impact of globalization on individuals, organisations and states. It will go on to explore three different perspectives on global change and how each perspective might view its effects including identifying possible weaknesses in their arguments. This will enable a decision to be made as to what extent the question "whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organisations or states stand to benefit can be agreed with. Globalization can be characterized by four distinctive features. First it involves a stretching of social, political and economic activities across nation-state boundaries. What is happening on what might be geographically the other side of the world, affects the other and specific local developments can have considerable global consequences. Examples of this would be global climate change, environmental issues such as pollution into the atmosphere and oceans, poverty etc. ...read more.

Middle

There is no doubt that many developing countries have increased their share of world trade as a result of globalization although this may be at the detriment of the poorer countries. There are three positions which all have a different perspective on the term globalization; these are the globalist, inter-nationalist and transformationalist and all three have strengths and weaknesses to their arguments. Globalists on the whole see Globalisation as something that is real and is happening - that changes are happening socially and economically and that it is an inevitable, irreversible development that should not be resisted. But globalists themselves fall into two categories - optimistic/positive globalists and pessimistic globalists. Optimistic/positive Globalists view it as a process that is beneficial. They would probably disagree with the statement that very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit because they welcome the changes that it brings such as improvement on the quality of life, raising living standards and the bringing together of societies and cultures - promoting a better understanding of each other. They acknowledge that globalisation is not all good news, that with it issues such as global environmental pollution, for example, but want citizens to take responsibility for their actions, to look for ways of minimising the damage through their own actions and through the use of new technologies. ...read more.

Conclusion

A strength of the transformationalist is that they see sovereignty as having to be shared among other private and public agencies. They would probably sit on the fence as to whether people, organizations or states stand to benefit from globalization. Some people do benefit, some don't. Some organisations benefit, some don't, and so on. It might depend on who you are, what you are, where you live etc. A weakness of the transformationalist would be that they are somewhat blinded by the scale of global inequalities that are developing as a result of rationalisation as they tend to have more of a "regional" focus. The word "globalization" seems to have come from no where to be almost everywhere. Globalisation is political, technological, cultural and economic, it affects everyone and its effects can be seen everywhere. There are winners and losers but with reference to the original question in the introductory paragraph personally it would have to be a disagreement with this statement. Globalization is not something that should be shirked but the challenges it presents need to be controlled because it is now part of the way we live and it's not going to go away. Metaphorically speaking it may mean a shrinking world but it is creating something that has never existed before and it is without doubt changing our world, for better or worse, no matter where or whom we happen to be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    The most important contention put forward by advocates of globalization is that it is a progressive movement improving the lives of people. Engagement with the rest of the world facilitates growth. Growth, in turn, reduces poverty and promotes prosperity. A great example is the tremendous economic success enjoyed by national

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    Many people believe that globalization has decreased poverty and inequalities in global income. China's opening to world trade has encouraged huge development of the economy and industries and therefore this has encouraged further social development within the country. This statement can be supported by looking at the Human Development Index (HDI)

  1. Discuss Globalization.

    (www.civiced.org) In many people's opinion, this is becoming far too unbalanced, and it is not a healthy situation to be in. The general feeling amongst the international community being that the majority of power should not be vested in private enterprises but should remain with the Nation-States as it has done since the Westphalian state system was introduced.

  2. 'Anarchy is what states make of it' (A Wendt) Do you agree?

    security and trade, and also provides typical norms and conventions for other states to follow, which in doing so shows that they are being compliant and following international law, thus giving them respect and prestige in the international community. International law may be regarded as 'a body of rules which

  1. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of Spain by 1516

    Although some nobles maintained control of regional politics, which was a big threat to the crown as they had no standing army, whereas most nobles kept retainers. An example of when the crown and nobility worked together to ensure the stability of the country was the Granada between 1482 and 1492.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    The OECD countries have gradually opened their markets further, consolidating the liberalisation of trade and capital controls since the late 1940s. Among the developed countries, Australia and New Zealand were exceptional in, first, cleaving to high protection for so long, and then liberalising fast and radically from the early/mid 1980s.

  1. Economic Development of India. The CSO provides us the data of the economic ...

    The substantially-inclusive growth across the states adds up to miracle growth of the economy in the national level. Awakening of BIMARU The economic growth of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh once termed as BIMARU meaning "sick" states in Hindi for its poor economy has now emerged as a miracle economy.

  2. Are recessions inevitable?

    You could ask a survey of economists and people, whether they think the economy is in recession, although this is very subjective. The chart below illustrates different ways to judge the severity of the economic slowdown since the start of the credit crunch in August 2007.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work