• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalization is without doubt it is a "buzz" word of the time - it is a word that seems to be constantly mentioned in the news on the television or radio. But what does living in a "globalized" world really mean? As a starting point this essay will attempt to interpret its meaning by applying four main theories and using these theories to discuss the impact of globalization on individuals, organisations and states. It will go on to explore three different perspectives on global change and how each perspective might view its effects including identifying possible weaknesses in their arguments. This will enable a decision to be made as to what extent the question "whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organisations or states stand to benefit can be agreed with. Globalization can be characterized by four distinctive features. First it involves a stretching of social, political and economic activities across nation-state boundaries. What is happening on what might be geographically the other side of the world, affects the other and specific local developments can have considerable global consequences. Examples of this would be global climate change, environmental issues such as pollution into the atmosphere and oceans, poverty etc. ...read more.


There is no doubt that many developing countries have increased their share of world trade as a result of globalization although this may be at the detriment of the poorer countries. There are three positions which all have a different perspective on the term globalization; these are the globalist, inter-nationalist and transformationalist and all three have strengths and weaknesses to their arguments. Globalists on the whole see Globalisation as something that is real and is happening - that changes are happening socially and economically and that it is an inevitable, irreversible development that should not be resisted. But globalists themselves fall into two categories - optimistic/positive globalists and pessimistic globalists. Optimistic/positive Globalists view it as a process that is beneficial. They would probably disagree with the statement that very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit because they welcome the changes that it brings such as improvement on the quality of life, raising living standards and the bringing together of societies and cultures - promoting a better understanding of each other. They acknowledge that globalisation is not all good news, that with it issues such as global environmental pollution, for example, but want citizens to take responsibility for their actions, to look for ways of minimising the damage through their own actions and through the use of new technologies. ...read more.


A strength of the transformationalist is that they see sovereignty as having to be shared among other private and public agencies. They would probably sit on the fence as to whether people, organizations or states stand to benefit from globalization. Some people do benefit, some don't. Some organisations benefit, some don't, and so on. It might depend on who you are, what you are, where you live etc. A weakness of the transformationalist would be that they are somewhat blinded by the scale of global inequalities that are developing as a result of rationalisation as they tend to have more of a "regional" focus. The word "globalization" seems to have come from no where to be almost everywhere. Globalisation is political, technological, cultural and economic, it affects everyone and its effects can be seen everywhere. There are winners and losers but with reference to the original question in the introductory paragraph personally it would have to be a disagreement with this statement. Globalization is not something that should be shirked but the challenges it presents need to be controlled because it is now part of the way we live and it's not going to go away. Metaphorically speaking it may mean a shrinking world but it is creating something that has never existed before and it is without doubt changing our world, for better or worse, no matter where or whom we happen to be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    economies of the 'Tiger' economies of Singapore and South Korea, which have had some of the highest growth rates in the international economy. In fact, for South Asia, the average life expectancy at birth has more than doubled from only 30 years just before World War II to 63 years today.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    (The Guardian 1999). The increased access to communications through the media has heightened public awareness. However, John Pilger sees the media as simply propaganda of western power, by its manipulation of language and omissions, which often prevents us from understanding the meaning of contemporary events.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Hence their more pressing need for the protection of a well-functioning system of international trading rules. * Perhaps most importantly, but often overlooked, multilateral rules can bolster domestic reform efforts. Binding WTO commitments, such as GATT tariff ceilings, lock in previously undertaken measures of liberalisation and help prevent a descent

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    As well as protecting the domestic economy as a whole by using import restrictions, government use similar protectionist measures to protect specific industries for a number of reasons. The first of these is to enable infant industries to grow. Infant industries are newly established industries that have not grown to the size where they can benefit from economies of scale.

  1. Will trading fairly reduce world poverty?

    However, Fairtrade are lacking in terms of selling there products. As a result fewer people are buying and fewer supermarkets are selling. However over the last few years there is in increase in demand for Fairtrade products and one of the main reasons for people choosing to buy these products are, to help the poor.

  2. Islamic terrorism is a serious problem for the United States because of the threat ...

    Bin Laden fled to Sudan, where he began working with the National Islamic Front (NIF), led by Hassan al-Turabi. While in the Sudan, he financed three terrorist training camps in cooperation with the NIF. After May 1996, his exact whereabouts have been unknown, with rumors placing him in places such

  1. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    The price mechanism, so often a source of economic efficiency and a contributor to growth, can, in the form of bribery, undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of government. Corruption and bribery encourages competition in bribery, rather than in quality and price of goods and services.

  2. Does Trade Benefit Everyone?

    Brazil should do the same but specialise in coffee and trade for cars. After specialisation both countries are better off and the total world production of their goods has increased and prices drop. This example is also an example of Hecksher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theory which states that DC's are more likely to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work