• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit' To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalization is without doubt it is a "buzz" word of the time - it is a word that seems to be constantly mentioned in the news on the television or radio. But what does living in a "globalized" world really mean? As a starting point this essay will attempt to interpret its meaning by applying four main theories and using these theories to discuss the impact of globalization on individuals, organisations and states. It will go on to explore three different perspectives on global change and how each perspective might view its effects including identifying possible weaknesses in their arguments. This will enable a decision to be made as to what extent the question "whether we call it "globalization" or "inter-nationalization", very few people, organisations or states stand to benefit can be agreed with. Globalization can be characterized by four distinctive features. First it involves a stretching of social, political and economic activities across nation-state boundaries. What is happening on what might be geographically the other side of the world, affects the other and specific local developments can have considerable global consequences. Examples of this would be global climate change, environmental issues such as pollution into the atmosphere and oceans, poverty etc. ...read more.

Middle

There is no doubt that many developing countries have increased their share of world trade as a result of globalization although this may be at the detriment of the poorer countries. There are three positions which all have a different perspective on the term globalization; these are the globalist, inter-nationalist and transformationalist and all three have strengths and weaknesses to their arguments. Globalists on the whole see Globalisation as something that is real and is happening - that changes are happening socially and economically and that it is an inevitable, irreversible development that should not be resisted. But globalists themselves fall into two categories - optimistic/positive globalists and pessimistic globalists. Optimistic/positive Globalists view it as a process that is beneficial. They would probably disagree with the statement that very few people, organizations or states stand to benefit because they welcome the changes that it brings such as improvement on the quality of life, raising living standards and the bringing together of societies and cultures - promoting a better understanding of each other. They acknowledge that globalisation is not all good news, that with it issues such as global environmental pollution, for example, but want citizens to take responsibility for their actions, to look for ways of minimising the damage through their own actions and through the use of new technologies. ...read more.

Conclusion

A strength of the transformationalist is that they see sovereignty as having to be shared among other private and public agencies. They would probably sit on the fence as to whether people, organizations or states stand to benefit from globalization. Some people do benefit, some don't. Some organisations benefit, some don't, and so on. It might depend on who you are, what you are, where you live etc. A weakness of the transformationalist would be that they are somewhat blinded by the scale of global inequalities that are developing as a result of rationalisation as they tend to have more of a "regional" focus. The word "globalization" seems to have come from no where to be almost everywhere. Globalisation is political, technological, cultural and economic, it affects everyone and its effects can be seen everywhere. There are winners and losers but with reference to the original question in the introductory paragraph personally it would have to be a disagreement with this statement. Globalization is not something that should be shirked but the challenges it presents need to be controlled because it is now part of the way we live and it's not going to go away. Metaphorically speaking it may mean a shrinking world but it is creating something that has never existed before and it is without doubt changing our world, for better or worse, no matter where or whom we happen to be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    Life expectancy at birth has also increased very considerably around the world. Moreover, the gap in life expectancy between the old industrial and the developing countries has narrowed. Child mortality has declined and living conditions have improved considerably for most inhabitants of the developing world.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    (The Guardian 1999). The increased access to communications through the media has heightened public awareness. However, John Pilger sees the media as simply propaganda of western power, by its manipulation of language and omissions, which often prevents us from understanding the meaning of contemporary events.

  1. 'Anarchy is what states make of it' (A Wendt) Do you agree?

    security and trade, and also provides typical norms and conventions for other states to follow, which in doing so shows that they are being compliant and following international law, thus giving them respect and prestige in the international community. International law may be regarded as 'a body of rules which

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    Sceptics argue that globalization paralyses governmental efforts to subject worldwide economic forces to regulation and control. A seismic shift in the global economy has occurred, resulting in the 100 largest economies in the world today consisting of only 49 states while the remaining 51 economies are transnational corporations. (www.civiced.org)

  1. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of Spain by 1516

    Although some nobles maintained control of regional politics, which was a big threat to the crown as they had no standing army, whereas most nobles kept retainers. An example of when the crown and nobility worked together to ensure the stability of the country was the Granada between 1482 and 1492.

  2. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    Inefficient companies are both more likely to bribe, and to bribe more than an efficient company, because it has more to "gain" from doing so. However, corruption is an abuse of public office for private gain and it is often means governance problems and hurt economic development.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Trade policy reform and "multi-track" trade policy Trade policy has become progressively more liberal in the last couple of decades as part of wider packages of economic policy reform, although this trend is patchy and uneven.

  2. Globalisation of GAP

    I found that this was a partly bad decision. I found that Gap found entering into the European market very difficult finding it hard to please the customer and increase sales. As I said earlier Gap's intention's when opening stores in both France and the UK were positive however the share price does not suggest this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work