• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did continental countries engage in a "Scramble for Africa" in the later nineteenth century

Extracts from this document...


Why did continental countries engage in a "Scramble for Africa" in the later nineteenth century? From about 1870-1905, also known as the 'Era of Empire for Empire's Sake', 'The Great Adventure' and 'The Scramble for Africa', European nations began what is called 'New Imperialism' today. During this age, almost 23,000,000 km� of territory was acquired. Colonialism was widespread in Southeast Asia and the East Asia seaboard, but Africa was still ultimately the target of imperialist expansion. It is rather apparent that these European nations, primarily Britain, France, Germany and Italy, embarked on a foreign policy of expansionism due to mainly economic, reactionary and humanitarian reasons. However, the debate here is which is the most important reason. The European nations wanted colonies for economic development. Medical advancement in the 18th century reduced mortality rates and lengthened life expectancies. ...read more.


Hence, to ensure living standards continually improve and not decline, new territories were necessary to establish new trade lines, so as to import and export more goods. The western powers were concerned about their rivals becoming more economically powerful than they were and feared this would upset the balance of power in Europe. Others would eventually own available territories they realised if they were not quick to do so. Besides, securing vital waterways (e.g. Suez Canal) was crucial in smoothing the flow of overseas trade, which had become of paramount importance to the survival of the economies of the European nations. Under intense political pressure, mainly from the supporters of the Conservative Party, Britain became the first to enter the 'race for colonies' and secured abundant economic and military benefits. Nations such as France, Germany and Italy believed that they too could enjoy equally substantial, or even greater benefits and therefore, began scrambling for colonies, especially in Africa. ...read more.


While the Belgians were the main perpetuators of the ill-treatment of African workers, the Dutch were commonly associated with the Cultivation System they implemented in Indonesia, which saw the Javanese being forced to grow cash crops for export purposes. Why do the European nations strive to better their economies? Why do they fear that their rivals would become more powerful than they would Everything boils down to the issue of 'international prestige'. One would stand in awe of a nation with a flourishing economy, vast sphere of political influence, and a powerful army. The expansion of the French colonial empire was also seen as a method of 'rejuvenating' the country after its humiliating defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1870). Italy, after its unification in 1870, sought to become a great power and thus, began to scramble for colonies. Thus, to conclude, the desire for international prestige is the fundamental reason of imperialism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the levels of economic development in the regions of Europe and ...

    the Sahara are becoming larger, enveloping area around them, leaving less space for land. This process is partly due to the deforestation of areas of forest; with no roots to hold soil in place, it blows away leaving an infertile desert.18 Europe has a well developed financial sector.

  2. Colonialism and Colonies.

    Those who advocated mercantilism believed that exports to foreign countries were preferable both to trade within a country and to imports because exports brought more money into the country. They also believed that the wealth of a nation depended primarily on the possession of gold and silver.

  1. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    (Coal, oil, timber) * The tropics had perfect weather for growing some cash crops such as cocoa in Ghana, tea and coffee in Kenya. * Some areas would make excellent settlement area for these countries citizens, such as southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe)

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Hence there is a good chance that the new round will be derailed if developed countries do not live up to their ATC commitments by the 2005 deadline. The Ministerial Declaration proclaims new negotiations "to reduce or as appropriate eliminate tariffs, including the reduction or elimination of tariff peaks, high

  1. Why was slavey abolished in the 19th century?

    The growth of industry and expansion of trade links meant that it made sense for areas without a satisfactory labour force to receive larger instalments of men to work the land. The situation seemed to call for a more direct call of action from anti-slave protesters and soon a new

  2. Critically assess the argument that countries will be better-off if they engage in international ...

    Let's have a look at one example of such a case by using two countries/two products model; Russia & Spain producing only potatoes & laptops. Assume that both countries have the same but limited total amount - 6000 units - of resources which can be used to produce either potatoes or laptops.

  1. How is Pinney Linked with Slavery?

    I believe it was written immediately after Black Polly stopped doing her work as being the plantation it was beneficial to him to make her work again. The source could be slightly biased as Pinney wrote he it therefore he could be emphasizing the work Black Polly had not done.

  2. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    Economic historians have a very conflicting view of the performance of the late Victorian British entrepreneur, especially as it is seen as a major factor when explaining Britain's loss of industrial leadership. The 'pessimistic view', which condemned the late Victorian and Edwardian entrepreneur, has been the mainstream view of historians until the late 1960s and early 1970s.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work