• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the colonial powers develop a need for African Slavery?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the colonial powers develop a need for African Slavery? The European colonial power's reliance and use of the African slave trade has become notorious for the vast scale of its commercial operation that relied on inhumane and destructive principles.1 In it we see societies at the apparent height of civilised progress devise a highly brutal system of human trade. Why colonial powers developed a need for African slavery is an analysis of colonialism, wealth, Africa and a consideration of the ideology of institutions that could obstruct or promote it. The ascendancy of economic and political freedoms, specifically those geared to capitalism, would fuel the development of desire for African slaves with the ideological blessing of both Church and State. An examination of first British and then Iberian colonies in the seventeenth century proves an excellent analysis for why a colonial power developed a need for slavery. Initially demand for workers in the New World was satisfied by white 'servants' and preferential demand was given to them over non-whites for their civility and common language; both crucial if their employers were to gain maximum productivity from them.2 While blacks first arrived in Virginia in 1619 they enjoyed the same legal status as any white servant due to a lack of legislation to even define them as slaves. After their term of service ended they were free men as no indefinite or hereditary law existed to chattel them any further. The 1660s saw definite changes to this and the beginnings of a gulf between blacks and whites. The very preference for white servants would extend differing attitudes towards Africans to point of establishing laws in favour of better treatment for whites. ...read more.

Middle

invade, search out, capture and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be... and reduce their persons into perpetual slavery." From before the fall of Rome we see the Church accepting the existence of slavery into its constitution and while not extending it directly at least sanctioning others God-given right to do so. The Church, while supported existing rights of those within slave or serf systems, never led or gave religious blessing to any attempt to achieve liberty. Nor would they attempt to erode the universal conviction that institutional slavery was acceptable. Religious justification and foundations were laid for the Colonial powers to develop their need for African Slaves and extend it with no moral inhibitions dictated from above by Church or State. Indeed, State adoption across Western Europe of much of Roman law in, and prior to, the fifteenth century meant they absorbed a legal code that intrinsically accepted slaves within its framework. Ideology was systematically making the use of forced labour socially acceptable or even desirable given circumstance. George Fitzhugh's 1854 work, 'The Sociology of the South' controversially argues in favour of a need for slavery in order to establish the most productive use of labour for its masters while being the most socially beneficial form of governance for slaves. For total slavery dispenses with class and capitalist antagonism by promoting the protection of the weak and poor who would otherwise suffer, "slavery is the very best form of socialism, the ordinary wages of common labour are insufficient to keep up separate domestic establishments for each of the poor... starvation is in many cases inevitable." The alternatives of liberty can only result in "the dissociation of labour and the disintegration of society." ...read more.

Conclusion

Surges in demand as imports came to be perceived as a necessity, not a luxury, could only be met by more plantations and hence more slave imports. A virtuous economic circle albeit dependant slavery. European nation's maritime power and colonies would allow them to skew world markets in their favour. This dynamic of wealth generation would rely increasingly on their control and development of the slave trade to the point that it had to continue perpetually to meet the needs of colonist and consumer. Economic logic dictated that the development of a need for African slaves had a ghastly inevitability. Institutions designed to protect their own citizens such as the Church or the Aristocracy had no power or desire to limit the development of a need for slavery. Indeed they would be instrumental in bringing about its operation. In an absence of legislation on slavery in the colonies those who required forced labour were also in the position of power to develop and gear a new legal system to the procurement of it. The British Prime Minister, Lord Melbourne opinion encapsulates the elevation of the importance of profit above all else in developing a need for African slavery, "religion, morality, law, eloquence [and] cruisers will all be ineffective when opposed to a profit of a cent per cent and more." Slavery would only begin to ebb with the fall of profits associated with the trade. Yet slavery did continue in areas long devoid of its financial benefits for reasons of social prestige or ideological entrenchment. In these cases great shifts in political and intellectual philosophy would bring its downfall. An ideological tradition made the acceptance of slavery possible in the first place. Profit motive would develop that possibility into a desire and consequentially a need for African slavery. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Liberation Theology versus Neo-liberalism

    They complain that this economic model of globalization is subsidiary and puts the poor in a subservient position to the rich. Liberation theologians claim that today's world economy involves "increased poverty and cultural domination, arising from unequal exchange in international trade and the dominance of multinational corporations over investment, employment and cultural decisions in poor countries" (Rowland 220).

  2. Are recessions inevitable?

    18 But it must be hastily added that there are approximately 3 million more people of working age this time than last, and 4.5 million more than in the early 1980s recession. And regardless of all the media headlines portraying a pessimistic economy, it is worth bearing in mind that many people do actually keep their jobs.

  1. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    Aldcroft stressed that the economic supremacy that Britain had once enjoyed had been built up by a nation of 'practical tinkerers'. This was clearly no longer acceptable in the increasingly competitive international business arena. He particularly condemns such science-based industries as iron and steel, electrical engineering and the chemical industry which, were becoming increasingly dependent upon scientific and technical expertise.

  2. Attempt an assessment of the part played by William Wilberforce in the abolition of ...

    had, to a considerable degree, facilitated its occurrence, the abolition of slavery is attributed to the culmination of numerous diverse factors. Amongst these was the mobilisation of public opinion in the form of the mass petition. Although for Wilberforce this was "...a strange new weapon and it lay uneasily in his hands."

  1. "Machine breaking and strike action were characteristic of unruly and undisciplined Labourers".

    The combination acts essentially banned trade union activity therefore turning all hopes of worker initiatives into clandestine secret groups whom had to express their anger at their employees not only secretly but also illegally. However despite this new oppressive combination act, there is little evidence to support that it was

  2. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    this was living in Afghanistan and in order for the USA to find him they had to bomb Afghanistan this lead to innocent lives being lost and a whole load of refugees leaving the country and inhabiting others. This was not good for the country, as the damage that they received would put dents in their already poor financial position.

  1. In this report, we shall explore the reasons for the shift from multilateralism to ...

    for Western firms and protect the interest of Western lending institutions at the expense of Asian workers. This spurred great dissatisfaction among Asians. Coupled with the fact that export growth will remain a key factor for the post-crisis recovery and greater economic growth and welfare of the region, East Asian

  2. Will trading fairly reduce world poverty?

    jobs, but to deny the connection between the two is to ignore evident economic principles. (Source: Freedom Works) This could create a barrier for other industries to trade and it is a sign of unfair trade and a sign of how industries use protectionism to their advantage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work