• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to "Weapons of Mass Distraction", discuss whether fiscal policy is an effective tool to control economic growth.

Extracts from this document...


With reference to "Weapons of Mass Distraction", discuss whether fiscal policy is an effective tool to control economic growth. Fiscal Policy is the method a government can use to control the trade cycle. Fiscal Policy uses government spending to increase or decrease various parts of aggregate demand. These are shown as AD=C+I+G+(X-M). A major problem with fine-tuning the economy is the time lags that are involved with fiscal policy. These time lags mean that when a fiscal policy change has been put into effect, the results may come at a later period. If the economy is doing well at this period, this could well push the AD curve too close towards AS creating inflation. This means that even though it shows that fiscal policy is an effective tool, it maybe used improperly causing a problem not a solution. However, if fiscal policy is used at the right time, it will indeed be a very effective tool. And so we can infer that fiscal policy is indeed effective, yet a risk as timing also plays an important factor in its success. One of the reasons it is so effective, is due to the multiplier effect. This multiplier effect measures the effect of the cycle of respending has on the economy. ...read more.


However, if the multiplier effect is too low, then a change in AD may not be significant enough to create a difference. The extent to which these changes affect inflation, also depend on how big the output gap is to start with. Changing government spending and taxation mainly forms fiscal policy. This is because it directly affects G in the equation. However, it is generally assumed that tax cuts are less effective than government spending. This is because not all of the tax revenue received by the government. This means the mpc will be low and so reducing the effects of mpc. Also, it is difficult to measure how firms and people would react to tax cuts. Some might be ignorant of the tax cuts and carry on as normal making few adjustments. Yet some might create long-term strategies to work around the tax cut. And so how much effect the tax cut has on the economy depends on the forecast of whether the tax cut is temporary or permanent. If it's permanent, it is most likely going to have huge change, whereas a temporary one wouldn't. The extent to which the effect of the tax has would also depend on which type of tax and whether it's direct or indirect. ...read more.


The extent to which the effectiveness of fiscal policy depends on is the responsiveness of the public to these changes in fiscal policy. In an economy like Japan, fiscal policy is useless as expectations are too low for it to have an effect and increase consumer spending. Therefore expectations play an important part in how effective fiscal policy is. In conclusion, all of these factors affect the economy. However, some affect the economy more than others such as taxation is less effective than spending. Also, the effect of fiscal policy would also change depending whether the economy was in a boom or a recession. We can see this because fiscal policy would have more effect in a boom due to greater expectations and more confidence. And so overall we can see by weighing up the arguments, that fiscal policy is a powerful tool, yet it must be used in the right way. The effectiveness comes from the interaction of these two variables. If they are used to complement each other, then fiscal policy is indeed very handy. However if the opposite is true, then it can b a devastating blow to the economy in the form of deflation or inflation or loss of confidence. An important factor is also monetary policy. If monetary policy is loose, then fiscal must be very tight in order to increase the capacity of the economy substantially. Peter Tsarkov ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Compare the effectiveness of the fiscal and monetary policy with some reference to supply ...

    3 star(s)

    Too many injections from the fiscal policy will cause public spending to increase too much, which may then cause a consumer boom. This means there will be a shortage in the numbers of workers causing a rise in wages and prices.

  2. Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives ...

    For example, in times of a recession, unemployment rises, therefore the country fails to produce its maximum potential level of output. The trend rate of growth is upward sloping and approximates the growth in productive potential in an economy. However the actual level of GDP at any particular time may vary from the general trend line.

  1. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    However, at present Japan's economy is contracting due to the fall in population which result from decreasing fertility and aging population. Therefore in order to overcome this problem, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Japan proposed a plan to accept 10 million immigrants over the next 50 years.

  2. the limitations of Fiscal Policy

    For example, fiscal policy is used by Australian government to reduce the foreign debt and improve the current account deficit (CAD) in Australia after World War II (Gruen and Sayegh, 2005b). Furthermore, fiscal policy is used by the government to make adjustments in the economy when demographic change is likely to affect the economy.

  1. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    Tax revenue, other than CBR is budgeted at Rs 74806 million which shows an increase of 6.7%. Non-tax revenue have been projected at Rs 141517 million in 2004-05 as compared with Rs 180875 million in revised estimates 2003-2004. * Detailed information on various components of tax revenue and non-tax revenue is given in following Tables.

  2. Fiscal policy is a macroeconomic policy.

    From the multiplier, we can work out such an increase in spend is requiring by the government: k = 1/ (1-MPC) = 1/0.25 = 4 ?Y= k x ?G we need Y rise by 4000 (i.e. ?Y= 4000) 4000 = 4 x ?G ?G = 1000 Therefore, increasing aggregate demand by 1000 (G)

  1. Using Fiscal Policy to Improve Employment.

    Along with the loss of tax this is a 'double whammy'. With higher employment, firms are likely to do better and make better profits. If they make less profit because of unemployment, they may have fewer funds to invest. So, unemployment causes loss of profits.

  2. The UK fiscal policy.

    Notably, the direction is from the direct tax to the indirect tax. Also, the increasing government spending and proportional change are also found out. Besides, whether the tax revenue can compensate the government spending is also examined. In this paper we report the results of an analysis of the direct/indirect

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work