• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A comparison of two poems on the subject of war, "Who's for the game?" and "Dulce et Decorum Est".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A comparison of two poems on the subject of war "Who's for the game?" is a recruitment poem that was written by Jessie Pope to persuade men to enlist for the First World War. She composed 'crude war verses' for the Daily Mail, and was particularly detested by wartime poet, Wilfred Owen. In one of his poems, "Dulce et Decorum Est," Owen uses direct address to poets like Jessie Pope, and for this reason I am going to compare and contrast these two very different styles of poetry by two very diverse authors. "Who's for the game?" was written at the beginning of the war and consequently was written in Georgian style, as was a lot of the poetry of that era. The poem consists of four, four-line stanzas with a,b rhyming scheme, which gives the poem added rhythm. This 'sing-song' approach ties in with the ideas the poem holds, about war being a 'game' and a 'show.' These similes were commonly used in wartime propaganda as a way of encouraging men to sign up, to make war seem almost appealing. The last line of each stanza is almost mocking - Pope being not able to believe that men could be so 'cowardly.' Historically, during this period of time women were very involved in convincing men to join the army. For example, women would present men with a white feather, as a symbol of their cowardice. ...read more.

Middle

Within her poem, Pope uses many questions, which involve the reader more, and, together with the use of everyday language give the poem a less formal feel. She persuades the men to join the army by making them feel deceitful and cowardly if they were to 'lie low.' She also has a friendly manner in her propaganda poem as she refers to the men as 'lads.' The first three lines in each four-line stanza are all about the heroism and eagerness that each man should feel, while the last line is a cutting remark about the cowardice of men who would not sign up. Pope has written this poem in four quatrains with a regular rhythm and rhyme scheme, which makes the poem more memorable. This is also a technique employed in children's poetry and as such trivialises her subject matter. Only the last stanza is different, instead of questions to her readers, Jessie Pope summarizes her ideas and makes the poem appeal to men as individuals, in the final line '..she's looking and calling for you.' The biggest writing technique that Jessie Pope uses is in her metaphorical language, comparing war to a 'game,' - 'the biggest that's played.' This disillusioned idea exhibits the attitude towards war that woman and children had, back at home in England. Pope continually uses comparisons throughout the four stanzas of the poem, and some onomatopoeia in 'crashing' and 'grip.' ...read more.

Conclusion

However the army generals use the men as pieces in a game, to them the soldiers are just cannon fodder, but in reality they are dealing with somebody's life. This is why Wilfred Owen dislikes Jessie Pope. In the final paragraph, Wilfred Owen takes an immediate shot at Jessie Pope by saying 'you too could pace' and 'if you could hear'. It is trying to say that they should not be able to write about the war when they do not have a clue about the consequences of her poetry. Sarcastically Owen calls the pro-war poet my friend; this implies a fellow poet, Jessie Pope, rather than an actual friend. Being referred to as friend will not offend the pro-war poet yet it shows their responsibility to tell the truth and their adverse effect on the youth. Jessie Pope's poem "Who's for the game?" is a prime example of the persuasive propaganda written to encourage men to go to war. However poetically it is a very simple verse, and, to me, reflecting back on the tragedies that happened, it is almost nauseating to think that Jessie Pope was responsible for persuading men to go to war. In contrast, Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est," is a startling first-hand account of a personal experience, and yet is "impersonal," this man dying could have been anyone of the men who died during the war. For this reason I would conclude that in my opinion, Wilfred Owen's poem is vastly superior to "Who' for the game?" Semini Sumanasuriya ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    A Comparison of "Who's for the Game" and "Dulce et Decorum est".

    3 star(s)

    "who thinks he'd rather sit tight" Pope mentions this type of man in an almost sarcastic manner, as if someone would actually want to sit out the war. If they did not want to be part of the war they would be missing out on the fun.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Write a comparison between Jessie Pope's 'Who's for the Game?' and Mackintosh's 'Recruiting' considering ...

    3 star(s)

    would be used to "'Lads, you're wanted, go and help'" and then compares it to the realistic image of the trenches with 'Lads, you're wanted! Over there'. He follows the tradition of simple propaganda. He reveals how tragic an existence in the trenches is with 'More poor devils like yourselves waiting to be killed by you'.

  1. Peer reviewed

    "With Specific focus on Wilfred Owen poems Disabled, Mental cases, Dulce et Decorum est, ...

    4 star(s)

    First of all the title already gives us an insight into the subject of the poem as it has a subtle double meaning behind it. The farewell to the soldiers and the hope of return and just simply sending them off to death.

  2. Based on the Poem "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.

    the noble pursuit of heroic ideals" (Norton Anthology of English Literature, Fifth Edition, 1891). A handful of poets, including Wilfred Owen, participated in the war, fought in the war, and some like Owen, died in the war. The poetry of these "war poets", as they are later termed, shows a

  1. In the poem Dulce et Decorum Est Wilfred Owen uses a variety of poetic ...

    All of these phrases indicate that Owen knows that he is choking in gas but he uses word choice here to describe it as if under water , this helps the reader imagine how horrific it would have been having to witness such an event.

  2. 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' by Wilfred Owen and 'War Grave' by Mary Stewart are ...

    Both poems also have words that usually represent funerals, such as 'flower' and 'prayers' showing that the soldiers were not buried in a dignified form. The reader feels disgust towards the people who treated the soldiers so carelessly and sympathy towards the young men and their families.

  1. How does Owen stress the true horror of the First World War, and how ...

    Also, the vocabulary and lexis seen here is very brash and confident to increase the impression that war is an adventure. Throughout this poem there are many direct rhetorical questions asked which would create a dialogue between the reader and the poetic voice.

  2. A comparison of 'Dulce Et Decorum Est' and 'Exposure' by Wilfred Owen, showing ...

    As the war was developing the pressure to take part in conflict grew increasingly. After training , Owen was labeled a second lieutenant. All his romantic notions was destroyed by the reality of war, water-logged trenches, barbed wire, bombardments and machine guns.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work