A Critique of Society in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Authors Avatar

The interpretation of Frankenstein is varied. While some critics believe the novel urges ‘no lesson of conduct, manners or morality’, others suggest that Frankenstein is undoubtedly a critique of what is good and evil in man and therefore in society.

        

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein was written in the early nineteenth century, when the industrial revolution had pervaded all part of European and British society. Rosenbrock had noticed that ‘the Victorian situation led to the danger of complacency.’ and Shelley, unlike most of her contemporaries, recognized this danger and foresaw the perils of the newly-born technological society, inherent in scientific research and the exploitation of nature. In her polemical novel, Shelley is concerned with the threat of knowledge when used for evil purposes, and questions just how far humanity can push the boundaries of nature with experiments and technological advances until all conduct, manners and morality in our society is gone. This is illustrated through victor’s attempt to surge beyond accepted human limits for the acquisition of undiscovered human knowledge. Philip Allingham describes the means that Shelley uses to demonstrate this; ‘Instead of submitting himself to the will of the community and the family, the scientist [Victor] asserts his ego by challenging the laws of nature.’ This is the most prevalent illustration of Shelley’s condemnation of society. Though many critics believe the novel offers ‘no lesson of conduct, manners or morality’ however, in my opinion, Frankenstein presents many arguments criticising different aspects of society which are still relevant to a modern reader.  

Within the novel, Shelley appears to criticise the patriarchal society that Victor Frankenstein and she herself, lived in. Mary Shelley, the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft, one of the first feminist writers and author of ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Women’ (1792). Throughout the text, the dominance of males is emphasised with every leading institution headed by men; the legal system, the Church, and the university professors are all male characters. However, Shelley constantly portrays these men in an unfavourable manner. When Justine speaks of her trial she states ‘My confessor has besieged me; he threatened and menaced, until I almost began to think that I was the monster that he said I was.’ Here, not only is the legal system condemned for the execution of an innocent, but the Church which is predominantly male, is also. It could be argued that Shelley has done this purposefully to explore the view that men are responsible for the corruption and demise of society’s morality and she was trying to highlight the injustice’s that the patriarchal culture has brought about.  

Join now!

 Furthermore, Shelley illustrates through Elizabeth the dispossession that women faced at that time. Elizabeth never receives any formal education as women were denied this right at the time. This situation is mirrored by the monster who has to teach himself, as there were no other avenues available to him. Also, Frankenstein's mother never has a career and is seen to put all her efforts into looking after her children.  Women are seen as possessions, for men to protect; Frankenstein explains ‘She presented Elizabeth to me as her promised gift. Her whom I fondly prized before every other gift or fortune.’ ...

This is a preview of the whole essay