An Analysis of Ernest Hemmingway's Indian Camp

Authors Avatar

An Analysis of Ernest Hemmingway's Indian Camp


Ernest Hemmingway's Indian Camp has varied degrees of ideas and issues. Each time I read the story or look at a specific passage, I understand it a bit differently. Keeping an open mind while reading helps to understand the story with many different assumptions or conclusions. The readers are left to assume and add their input to complete the story.

The story never states that Nick, Nick's father or Uncle George are Caucasian. Nor does it say they are related. I believe the reader can assume this due to the use of "Uncle" with Georges' name. However, I personally have friends that are not blood relatives, yet they are considered family and called Aunt or Uncle so and so. Let's assume that all three of these characters are also Indians. Prehaps they come across the river because they belong to a separate tribe. Based on this assumption, the whole story changes. Uncle George calling the biting, laboring woman a "Damn Squaw *censored*!" maybe acceptable. The story doesn't say the guides objected to Uncle George's insult. Maybe it wasn't even an insult. I can relate this to today's society when one calls another Honkey. That's OK unless the person saying it is not Caucasian. Sipiora gives an analysis of "Indian Camp" (pp 31-34) yet this analysis is based on assumptions also. The complete story can only be assumed without knowing a bit of Hemmingway's personal life. An important piece of information would be that Hemmingway's dad, Clarence Edmunds, was a physician himself. (Schafer, 1)

If Nick and Nick's father are of the Indian dissent, could this explain why Nick's father has limited equipment or no anesthetic? Native Americans don't always agree or conform to modern society technologies. Normally a Native American's faith is strong. Could it be that this laboring woman's faith was to be used as anesthetic? Another conclusion might be that Uncle George was smoking medicinal cigars. In the story Uncle George gave the cigars to the escorts. Is this Uncle George's way of asking for their help? Perhaps Nick's father may have not been able to afford any luxuries such as scalpels, sponges, sutures, etc. The reader could conclude that Nick's father, aka Chief, had no transportation to get to the village to buy or trade for equipment or anesthetic. I would believe that if Nick's father was a middle to upper-class person as assumed in Sipiora's analysis, then he would have had these items. Interesting here again is the fact that Hemmingway was raised in Oak Park, Illinois in a "upper middle-class" (Schafer 1)

Nick's father appears to be an educated person treating the under-educated Indian society. This "doctor is superior to all" attitude is interesting. Within the past 5-10 years, this belief has decreased. Patients used to do everything their doctor suggested. Now society asks questions, suggests treatments and even consult their friends for advise on medical issues. No longer does society put the doctor on a pedestal. This is not to say doctors are not respected. However, this approach does make the doctor to seem more like a regular human. In "Indian Camp" Hemmingway makes Nick's father seem ordinary. No one is bowing down to him, saluting him, hailing him or making Nick's father to be anything but ordinary.

Fishing is obvious one of Nick's father's ordinary-person hobbies. One way this is demonstrated is by Nick's father performing surgery with a jack knife similar to gutting a fish. Nick's father also sutures with "nine-foot, tapered gut leaders". Another similarity to fishing may be the fact that Nick's father rows the boat back home much like one would after a long day of fishing. Where did the guides go? Why are they not rowing Nick and Nick's father home? If Nick and Nick's father were visitors (white man) would the guides not take them back across the river? Possibly, Nick's father was a regular human that liked to fish and was also the village doctor.

As stated there are many different ways that the reader could interrupt this story. As Sipiora states, Hemmingway uses an "iceberg principle" (p. 31) leaving only 1/3 of the story exposed to the reader. Then the reader must assume and conclude his or her own thoughts to make the story complete. Each of us are so different and we have experienced such different routes in our life that the way Sipiora interrupts the story or Johnny or Suzie will be different than my own interpretation. Some interesting facts about Hemmingway that may help the reader to better understand Indian Camp are

"the first in a series of stories of Nick Adams. It initiates a
∙ sequence of stories that follows Nick from boyhood through his combat experience in World War I" (Moore),

He lived with his mother and physician father∙ in a "remote region of northern Michigan" (Moore),

"he felt bitter∙ toward both his parents, particularly his mother, whom he viewed as selfish and domineering" (Schafter).

Knowing these elements about the author gives the reader a better foundation of understanding of the story. And only know do I think I see the story as Hemmingway wanted me to.

Join now!

Reader Response to A Clean, Well-Lighted Place

 

In 1933, Ernest Hemmingway wrote A Clean, Well-Lighted Place. It's a story of two waiters working late one night in a cafe. Their last customer, a lonely old man getting drunk, is their last customer. The younger waiter wishes the customer would leave while the other waiter is indifferent because he isn't in so much of a hurry. I had a definite, differentiated response to this piece of literature because in my occupation I can ...

This is a preview of the whole essay