• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An Investigation into the Representation of The War on Iraq

Extracts from this document...


An Investigation into the Representation of The War on Iraq Words - 1,669 Pages - 5 This is an investigation into how the Iraq war and the policies around it are represented in texts written at the declaration of war, during the war, and a couple of years after the war. Three texts will be examined. Text A is a blog posted by Eric Margolis who is an editor for the Canadian Times who is also an anti-war advocate. It targets blog readers of Eric Margolis. Text B by Paul Wolfowits, who is the US Deputy Secretary of defence highlighting that there will be a very bias representation of the war on behalf of US soldiers in the text. Due to the text being an article in The Daily Telegraph, the audience are middle class to upper class citizens who read The Daily Telegraph. Text C is a declaration of war speech from George W Bush, so it has a worldwide audience although primarily American, unlike the other two texts. Each writer is attempting to persuade the audience into sharing their views about the Iraq war by either covering or revealing facts or actions made by the opposing aggressors (terrorists) or the Americans. Eric Margolis tries to reveal "the ugly truth" about the war by pointing out various factors including, oil being the main reason as to why America went to war with Iraq. ...read more.


Verbs and adverbs are used in all three texts to describe the American's actions at war, with varying representations. Text C tries to represent the Americans as peace-makers emphasising that war is a good idea to make the world a better place. For example the infinitive verb "to free" in "to free its people" gives the impression that American forces are going to physically help and liberate people in Iraq rather than invade and destroy the country, which are original connotations of "war". The speech is trying to represent the war in Iraq as almost a charity mission by the Americans giving and not taking. This twists the normal perception people have on war, showing it in a positive light, which leads people into a sense of security. Text A uses many factive verbs such as "emerged" and "admitted". These verbs are used to express truth and conviction as they are followed by as clause that is supposedly true. For example "recently admitted, the Iraq war was all about oil". This tries to ensure the reader believes what they are reading is fact and not personal opinion. The word "invasion" has been nominalised, as it is being used as a noun rather than a verb in the sentence "The invasion of Iraq." This emphasises the vulnerability of Iraq and how it is the victim of the war, showing how it has been abused and exploited by more than one country as it does not specifically mention that America invaded Iraq. ...read more.


In Text C, it states how the main goal of the invasion of Iraq was to "undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war", again using Saddam's dictatorship of Iraq as a main reason to war, emphasising the importance and positives of the war. In this simple sentence the word "war" is first used, as the subject of the sentence is Saddam Hussein, showing how war is only associated with him and not the Americans. To make Saddam's actions sound more aggressive the dynamic verb is used to create the alliteration "wage war". The three texts use similar methods to represent the war on Iraq in the way that they want to. All three articles are heavily biased, which means one could argue that there could be lack of reasoning behind some of their points. They are also all trying to challenge the representations of the war, both positive and negative. Text A, portrays the war as having no backbone other than greed for oil by the Americans, persuading the reader that this is the "ugly truth". Text B, tries to gain some sympathy towards American troops instead of the real victims of the American war against Iraq; however emphasising the good aspects the war on Iraq will bring such as liberating people from "Saddam's sadistic regime". Text B, uses rhetorical persuasive linguistic features to change the minds of people who are against the war on Iraq by convincing the audience that war on Iraq only has advantages. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ozlam Shalash, 12JP 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Language investigation

    Methodology I shall obtain samples of four female and four male voices. Two of each shall be RP speakers, two shall be estuary speakers. I shall record them reading the text as below. Accent test Please recite the alphabet Please read the following out loud; I made a cup of tea while it was raining.

  2. Language investigation into the language used by George Bush on the day of and ...

    Where the other texts are carefully dictated to a select group of people, text 3 finds George Bush standing on ground zero with a megaphone thanking the American services. Whilst the other speeches are written for him (as stated on www.whitehouse.gov)

  1. Free essay

    ENGA2 - Investigation into the representation of the May 2011 Alternative Vote Referendum in ...

    The second text is an article from the Guardian newspaper, dated May 4th 2011, entitled 'Yes to AV is yes to a fairer politics', written by the leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband. As Miliband has publicly come out in favour of changing the voting system to AV, I

  2. Examine the representation of WAGs in a range of Newspaper articles.

    If they are in the same category, this suggests that they share the same representation. In text A, wags were represented as gold-diggers who were inferior to everyone else, so WOWs could now share this representation. The subordinate embedded clause "Wives Of Wimbledon" is used to elaborate what a WOW is.

  1. Language Investigation: Barack Obama Inaugural Address

    * Superlatives / Comparatives I was amazed to find that Obama only used four superlatives throughout the entire speech. This implied that he was not going to over exaggerate what he would do for the country, but simply state how he would improve the country as a whole.

  2. English investigation

    I will also look at cooperation and competition as the experts have found that boys seem to be more competitive when using language whereas girls seem to be more co operative, even though this research was proved by using children as examples I would still like to see if it

  1. Language - symbolic representation

    People who are deft use sign language. Body language is another, the way people look when they are lying, the way people act when they are attracted to somebody, this is body language. Swearing is a form of language, why is fuck offending?

  2. Language Investigation on Shampoo Bottles

    and possessive pronouns which help establish the relationship between producer and consumer; the use of the concrete noun "baby" as a proper noun and its implications; the verb voice to create a sense of immediate effect and activity. Analysis: Considering the general preference and expectations for shiny hair, the market

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work