• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the ways in which Frayn presents the relationship between Stephen and Keith in "Spies"

Extracts from this document...


Analyse the ways in which Frayn presents the relationship between Stephen and Keith in "Spies" Stephen and Keith in the novel "Spies" share a very unique relationship. It is complex and multi-layered, the characteristics of which are unravelled with the aid of time, status and perception. We are able to gather from the onset of chapter two, (from the details about Stephen and Keith), that they share an unusual relationship and friendship, given the differences in their background and character. Stephen and Keith are two very different boys, both from different social classes. Keith is seen to be further up the social ladder than his friend and peer, Stephen. Frayn uses a variety of methods to suggest this. He uses a series of contrasts in their houses, clothes, and even parents. We are told Stephen's gate has "rotted drunkenly away from the top hinge", whereas Keith's has "well-oiled hinges". Stephen's clothes are "too short" or "too long", whereas Keith's are "not too short" and "not too long" making a direct contrast. These clusters of contrasts clearly suggest Stephen's inferiority, compared to Keith. A commonly used adjective to describe Keith is "right", whereas to the same end, Stephen is frequently referred to being "wrong", again, showing this clear social divide between the two. ...read more.


The recreation of the experience of spying is particular proof of this. The present tense is used and the young Stephen is presented in the first person, so as to create an immediacy and sense of excitement to their activities, such as "creeping" into Keith's house to investigate Mrs. Hayward's desk, or when imagining Mr. Gort to be a "murderer". Childish details such as the excitement of using a disguise kit, gliding "across to the desk as silently as Sioux", conveying the children's interest in cowboys all adds to the effect of creating a less than mature, childlike attitude. The soft alliteration in "silently as Sioux" further reinforces the weak, imaginary effect of childhood. Later in the book where the boys follow Mrs. Hayward through the tunnel for the first time, it is Stephen's idea. Stephen is appropriately pleased that he has taken some initiative. However, Keith is said to maintain "an attitude of judicious caution about [the] proposals, to remind [Stephen] that [Keith is] still leader of this expedition". This is further to the point that Stephen is subservient to Keith, who exploits it. It is, naturally, possible to see who the dominant person in the friendship is. During chapter five, Stephen goes through the tunnel on his own, at night. ...read more.


The two short sentences "You swore. You double swore" shows that Keith is extremely angry with Stephen. He "whispers" these words, and that goes as further evidence of his admiration with power. He seems to enjoy threatening Stephen. He seems to have no sense of remorse as on two separate occasions "the pressure on [Stephen's] throat increases". Keith clearly, even beyond their friendship, is in control. We are told that after this moment, Stephen "never went to Keith's house again". Their relationship had an abrupt ending as a result of the force and violence which Keith used on countless occasions. Therefore, and interesting and complicating relationship between Keith and Stephen is presented. We can clearly see that Stephen both admires Keith, and is frightened of him. They both enjoy childish games, but violence and threat exists. We see the relationship solely from Stephen's perspective, and as a consequence, only gain an insight into Keith through Stephen. The shifting between the past and present tense, and first and third person adds to the sense of complexity. It is further proof that the relationship can be viewed in many different ways. There obviously existed an uneven power balance in their relationship, as well as fear, happiness and comedy, which all effectively added to the intricacy of the boys' relationship. ?? ?? ?? ?? Simon Johnson - 12B Page 1 of 5 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Authors section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Authors essays

  1. How does Michael Frayn present the relationship between Stephen Wheatley and Keith Hayward?

    In all the games that Stephen and Keith played, Keith was the leader and Stephen was the led. The game of spying on Keith's mother never seemed to end and it endangered her efforts and so she put an

  2. Examine the presentation of the relationship between Keith and Stephen in Spies

    He talks about them as if they are a single entity: "we say nothing"; "we mustn't let her know that we know". This is similar to deadkidsongs by Toby Litt in which, at the start of the book, the gang of boys is portrayed as one single entity which slowly breaks apart as the book progresses.

  1. How does Frayn present young Stephen in the first three chapters of "Spies"? How ...

    As a result, due to Stephen constantly believing himself to be inferior, the reader starts to believe him inferior also, and could begin to look down on him ourselves. Although this could mean that we begin to pity Stephen, I believe that this more ensure that we feel frustrated with

  2. Spies. How does Frayn display Stephen and Keiths relationship at the start of ...

    Yet another important detail mentioned in those two paragraphs is "The picture is no longer monochrome." This small sentence can be seen as one of the most important due to its relevance of Stephen and Keith's relationship. The idea that Stephen's memory only bursts into colour when he sees Keith

  1. How Effectively Does Frayn Use Barbara Berrill in 'Spies'?

    of a clear view of what is going on and therefore is the ideal character to pass on her knowledge of the adult world, but is also not trusted by Stephen due to her status as a girl and therefore is torn between the safer and supposedly easier to understand

  2. Spies - Chapter 5. Using the chapter as a starting point explore how Frayn ...

    Frayn uses another motif in the passage which is the "dark green slime" Stephen tries to wipe of his hands. The slime is a motif for adultery because adultery is a nasty thing which links in with slime which is also foul and disgusting.

  1. Stephenss relationship with the Haywards has varied throughout the novel Spies

    Mrs Hayward is now able to trust Stephen and eventually relies on Stephen to help. Through this Mrs Hayward cries in front of Stephen and to Stephen "brimming tears", this shows that Mrs Hayward must trust Stephen as it was shameful to cry in front of somebody.

  2. Discuss the Implicit Suggestion of a Class Hierarchy as Revealed in Pages 1 to ...

    The reader soon becomes puzzled by the strange combination of the social classes and Frayn addresses this as he writes "I was acutely aware, even then, of my incomprehensible good fortune in being Keith's friend" and he is true, Stephen certainly wouldn't be let into most families of the Hayward's prowess.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work