• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Behind many of Larkins poems lies a raft of political assumptions, assess the extent to which you feel this to be the case.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Behind many of Larkin?s poems lies a raft of political assumptions. Informed by the Political readings section of the AQA anthologies assess the extent to which you feel this to be the case. Refer to one or more poems of your choice to support your answer. Larkin could usually be generalised as someone with strong conservative leanings and so one would expect that his poems are a reflection of his social and political views of society. If, however examined closely, through the perspective of a Marxist you could make the argument that he views the world in much the same way as Marx did but with different interpretations. ?The Large Cool store ?explores the idea of class in an era of great political and ideological change. In 1960?s Britain certain demographics in society were beginning to become more radicalised and social revolutions were taking place in all facets of life. One thing that really separates Larkin?s perspective from that of a Marxist perspective is although it could be argued is that both agree on the fact that there is a class division in Britain, both have totally different views on what the division is for. On the one hand Marx sees it as a tool to keep the working proletariat as a docile labour force being manipulated and controlled by the ruling bourgeoisie. ...read more.


Looking at ?Self?s The Man?, with a feminist perspective, it would be easy to make the argument that Larkin?s poem could be viewed as sexist. His negative view of women continues into the second stanza. ?Perk?, another example of colloquial lexis, is a work bonus. That the woman takes ?the money he gets? seems to present her as selfish, and the uses direct speech ?It?s Put a screw in this wall? mocks the women?s stereotypical words and undermines them, the imperative making her seem interfering and controlling. Direct speech is used again for the mother?s words: ?Saying Won?t you come for the summer.? Again, mocking and scornful, this utterance holds pseudo-snobbishness. After considering all the unlikeable things that Arnold has to do a list in the third stanza of things connected with the conjunction ?and?and?? creating a moaning, immature attitude), the persona concludes where he started, ?Oh, no one can deny ? ?That Arnold is less selfish than I?. A colloquial register is adopted, such as ?kiddies? clobber? referring to toys, ?perk?, and ?nippers?. It shows the lack of respect the persona has towards anything regarding the family. This negative view of marriage could be argued to represents Larkin?s own negative view. However, all the impressions are just filtered through the persona?s eyes,. ...read more.


Now they have entered into the snare of domesticity, children have replaced their place. Instead, their ?children, so intent on ?Finding unripe acorns? a hint that though they are young now, they will eventually grow into the same cycle ?expect to be taken home?. The verb ?expect? commands the women; their children and the thousand other domestic necessities trap them. ?Their beauty has thickened? is a metaphor that captures the signs of age, the beauty of youth filling out.The final two lines sum up the rest of the sad, sympathetic poem: ?Something is pushing them To the side of their own lives?. They have now become spectators in life this could be interpreted as the Marxist idea of alienation by society the couple each feels trapped in the social construction of marriage and feels isolated from the outside world. When looking at his poems it is important to note that he was neither a Marxist nor a feminist in fact he was fairly right leaning Tory. However it is possible to see both Marxist and Feminist criticisms when viewing the poems from that particular perspective. It is important to note the time most of his poems were written. In the 1960?s it could be argued that both Marxism and feminism were both far more relevant than they are today and so this could be the reason why it is easier to interpret some of what Larkin writes as being Marxist or Feminist. By Jack Sly 1700 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philip Larkin section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philip Larkin essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An 'A' Level candidate described Larkin as a "grumpy, old, git". Based on High ...

    3 star(s)

    of ageing "your mouth hangs open and drools, and you keep on pissing yourself". He exemplifies a 'git' with his truly derogative views and undermining of the dignity and wisdom which age brings. Although there is a strong argument supporting the view of Larkin as a git, this can be

  2. "The Past is a foreign country: they do things differently there." Referring to L. ...

    Burgess' grandson, the character of Edward symbolising the legacy we create in our children. As long as people continue to procreate they will never truly die, but live on through their offspring. Although his farmer friend had taken his own life all those years ago, Leo sees Ted Burgess once more in the face of his grandchild.

  1. Philip Larkin's Church Going.

    Upon leaving the church, he offers an Irish sixpence, worthless "play" money. While the offering is in some ways mocking, it recalls Ireland as a religious society, and reflects Yeats' early influence on Larkin. Yeats' emphasis on ritualistic ceremonies outside of traditional Christianity could have been the reason for the

  2. Using 3 poems, explore Larkin's contemplations on time

    'Still promising to solve, and satisfy', this particular section of sibilance creates a constant hissing sound, almost as if time is about to creep and attack further developing the idea of time as a brutal force. The rhyme scheme in conjunction with enjambement present an elegant and solemn tone to

  1. Do you find Larkins verse critical of ordinary people or does he champion their ...

    them" at the end of the sixth stanza suggests the persona is being more sympathetic. The criticism returns however with the constant repetition of "no" conveying a negative attitude. The speaker appears to be quite content with his own work however commenting "give me my in-tray".

  2. Larkin has been accused of a lack of sympathy in his poetry, based on ...

    being different and choosing 'freedom' and choice; they choose the conventional industry, 9am to 5pm jobs, unlike him being a poet with freedom of speech. This criticism of people's life enforces discrimination through stereotyping and makes Larkin appear in an unsympathetic light towards the circumstances people are forced into.

  1. There is a strong resemblance, both visually and literally, between the two poems 'Cut ...

    In the third stanza of the third verse, the cycle is starting all over again and the leaves are beginning to grow, yet again. 'Last year is dead they seem to say' 'Cut Grass' is a poem with a similar theme, but a wholly different mood.

  2. In Philip Larkins poem, This Be the Verse, he uses strong language to get ...

    It is as if the poet is now zooming out of the image he has set up in the last two stanzas. He uses metaphors that are much more general for example "man hands on misery to man" and " it depends like a coastal shelf."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work