• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Raonull Mackinnon Depth study E: Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 8) As with most arguments there are two sides to every story. There is evidence to support both sides. On one side there is the argument that the government did in fact knowingly mislead the public as to the conditions of the trenches. Also there is evidence that what they did hold back information but for the good of the country. During four years of the war the government knew how important it would be to keep the morale at home up. Without it the war was lost even before the soldiers had touched the ground in France. Men though were also guilty of censorship as well knowing full well the consequences if their families found out the truth of the horror that they were living through in the trenches. The morale at home would tumble. IN all likely hood the number of recruits would diminish quickly. ...read more.

Middle

Source J is a very good indication as to whether or not the government was telling the whole truth or not. From the evidence provided from Seigfreid Sassoon, it points towards a definite no. All government propaganda tells of how glorious and triumphant the men's deaths were or even how relaxed the trench life actually was as in the cigarette advert of source I. Source J is a very reliable source as it's author, Sassoon, was actually there. His graphic depiction of the battlefield suggests heavily that the government did in fact mislead the people of Britain, And in a way quite rightly so. If information as in source J like, "the mask of a human face which had detached itself from the skull", had got home riots would have erupted. That is why the government had to circulate pictures such as source F. The image promotes the bravery and camaraderie of the soldiers. Such things would have kept the soldiers morale up as well in such publications as "for king and country". ...read more.

Conclusion

People needed to be encouraged to work not depressed by the reality of a war that had finished. As always it depends on the origin of the piece. Source H for example is a first hand account of the battle of the Somme. It is first hand because he was actually there. Sixty years later he has given an extremely detailed piece of writing of how his experience at the battle of the Somme. An historian on the other hand was more than likely never they're relying only on the scraps of information being fed to him/her. Writing much later such as sources H and J are affected by hindsight. In 1918 emotions would still have been running high and in winning the war the historian may have been wearing rose tinted glasses. An historian writing much later would have more access to the facts of the event being covered. History reflects the time in which it is written. An historian writing in the aftermath of the first world war would give a very different view to a historian writing much later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    During The Big Push, there was 893 deaths, only British deaths, showing the soldiers had a 1 in 4 chance of reaching it back home, which also contradicts Source A. Source D helps in the supporting of the war because it shows the story was told to children of Empire who were the allies.

  2. Conscientious Objection Sources Questions

    The extract also says that conscription produced conscientious objectors - this supports the fact that some people did reject conscription. Therefore this source also disagrees with Source B, saying that quite a substantial number of British civilians revolted against conscription.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    through the incompetence, callousness and personal vanity of those in high authority". Raws is clearly angry with his superiors, but it is possible to say that his bitterness over brother, Goldy's death could have affected him. However, it was inaccurate information between headquarters and the front line trenches, which actually

  2. How Did the Blitz Affect Everyday Life in Britain?

    Gas was largely used in the First World War. If gas was to be dropped onto Britain, many would die as there would be little protection. The government decided that the best option was to distribute gas masks. Thirty-eight million gas masks were given out, they were easy to wear and they had to fit tightly around the face.

  1. History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

    No doubt the complete effectiveness of controlling the population through propaganda had a considerable effect, (referred to in Q 4,5,6,7b and 8) however, pictures from around the country such as source D were a regular occurrence.

  2. The effects of the First World War on British people between 1914 and 1918

    When the trench warfare started planes started playing a much bigger role in the war, both sides started to use planes for surveillance of the enemies troop movements and trenches, shooting down enemy spy planes (first with a machine gun fixed on the wings and later there was a built in machine gun)

  1. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    Other chose not to volunteer on the moral or religious grounds. The Quakers did not volunteer because they did not believe the war was the answer. Many other men refused to 'play God', ad take away another mans life. Some men refused to volunteer because they had people at home

  2. Women and the war effort in Britain 1914-1918

    written, the author has only put in what she thinks will make a woman sound more important to the war effort. Source E was written in 1915, a year after the war started, being written at the time would make this source biased.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work