• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Raonull Mackinnon Depth study E: Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 8) As with most arguments there are two sides to every story. There is evidence to support both sides. On one side there is the argument that the government did in fact knowingly mislead the public as to the conditions of the trenches. Also there is evidence that what they did hold back information but for the good of the country. During four years of the war the government knew how important it would be to keep the morale at home up. Without it the war was lost even before the soldiers had touched the ground in France. Men though were also guilty of censorship as well knowing full well the consequences if their families found out the truth of the horror that they were living through in the trenches. The morale at home would tumble. IN all likely hood the number of recruits would diminish quickly. ...read more.

Middle

Source J is a very good indication as to whether or not the government was telling the whole truth or not. From the evidence provided from Seigfreid Sassoon, it points towards a definite no. All government propaganda tells of how glorious and triumphant the men's deaths were or even how relaxed the trench life actually was as in the cigarette advert of source I. Source J is a very reliable source as it's author, Sassoon, was actually there. His graphic depiction of the battlefield suggests heavily that the government did in fact mislead the people of Britain, And in a way quite rightly so. If information as in source J like, "the mask of a human face which had detached itself from the skull", had got home riots would have erupted. That is why the government had to circulate pictures such as source F. The image promotes the bravery and camaraderie of the soldiers. Such things would have kept the soldiers morale up as well in such publications as "for king and country". ...read more.

Conclusion

People needed to be encouraged to work not depressed by the reality of a war that had finished. As always it depends on the origin of the piece. Source H for example is a first hand account of the battle of the Somme. It is first hand because he was actually there. Sixty years later he has given an extremely detailed piece of writing of how his experience at the battle of the Somme. An historian on the other hand was more than likely never they're relying only on the scraps of information being fed to him/her. Writing much later such as sources H and J are affected by hindsight. In 1918 emotions would still have been running high and in winning the war the historian may have been wearing rose tinted glasses. An historian writing much later would have more access to the facts of the event being covered. History reflects the time in which it is written. An historian writing in the aftermath of the first world war would give a very different view to a historian writing much later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    During The Big Push, there was 893 deaths, only British deaths, showing the soldiers had a 1 in 4 chance of reaching it back home, which also contradicts Source A. Source D helps in the supporting of the war because it shows the story was told to children of Empire who were the allies.

  2. In what ways did the attitudes of soldiers and civilians change towards the war ...

    The reason for the country's hatred of all things German was also down to the government. It released stories about atrocities committed by German soldiers such as sticking bayonets through babies. There is no evidence to suggest that this was true but the public at the time believed these stories

  1. How and Why did war poetry change during the years 1914 - 1918

    rest where there is no suffering, even though he is not breathing and his heart is not beating. He is at piece and his agony has ended. The two poems 'Who's For The Game' and 'Peace' have many similarities; but just as many differences.

  2. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    were scared of dying and losing everything that they had worked for. This fear of dying was made a great deal worse when rumours of the conditions on the front line filtered through to the public. They were told of the huge numbers of deaths and casualties that the British were taking.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    to get out and is likely that he would have drowned in the water and got sucked in by the mud. Such shell holes can be seen in Source H at the Newfoundland Park. Source H also shows masses of graves of the hundreds of thousands of people from all

  2. How Did the Blitz Affect Everyday Life in Britain?

    Anderson Shelters were designed for the garden and could be put together with a friend. An Anderson Shelter was made out of steel, and needed to be placed in a hole in the garden that was 1metre deep. The earth over the roof needed to be at least 90cm deep

  1. Women and the war effort in Britain, 1914-1918.

    I think source G tried to keep the public calm and so by printing this article they writer could attempt to show that everything in the factories was still running smoothly and try to keep morale high. If they had told the public about the goings on in certain factories

  2. Women and the war effort in Britain 1914-1918

    I don't believe source C to be of more importance to source E or vice versa. Source C is heavily biased because it was written with an obvious aim. Written in 1994, a time of total equality between men and women source C has a feminist attitude and is selectively

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work