• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chaucer's Irony - The Canterbury Tales

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chaucer's Irony Irony is a vitally important part of The Canterbury Tales, and Chaucer's ingenious use of this literary device does a lot to provide this book with the classic status it enjoys even today. Chaucer has mastered the techniques required to skilfully put his points across and subtle irony and satire is particularly effective in making a point. The Canterbury Tales are well-known as an attack on the Church and its r�le in fourteenth century society. With the ambiguity introduced by the na�ve and ignorant "Chaucer the pilgrim", the writer is able to make ironic attacks on characters and what they represent from a whole new angle. The differences in opinion of Chaucer the pilgrim and Chaucer the writer are much more than nuances - the two personas are very often diametrically opposed so as to cause effectual irony. In the Friar's portrait, he is delineated and depicted by riddles of contradictory qualities. Chaucer expertly uses ironic naivet� to highlight the Friar's lack of moral guilt. When the reader is told that the Friar, "knew the taverns wel in every toun" (l. 240), we can take it to mean that he spends very much time drinking, flirting and socialising in pubs. ...read more.

Middle

Chaucer cunningly uses this technique throughout The General Prologue: making the pilgrim miss seemingly obvious character flaws and instead ironically reporting an opposite, contrasting view thereby illustrating to the reader just how unethical his fellow pilgrim is. When a portrait is laden with irony such as this, it reinforces the immorality of the Friar when even the ignorant pilgrim can see that he is a "wantowne" (l. 208) person without a modicum of conscience. Shortly after the Friar, Chaucer makes a curt change in direction to cover the Clerk. Again, irony plays an important part in his portrait and is vital for us to understand what sort of person Chaucer the writer wants to portray. However, the irony used to describe this Oxford scholar is very different to that used to portray the Friar and many of the other pilgrims. This time, Chaucer is not drawn in by the intricate webs of deceit and lies spun by the other pilgrims, but instead makes his own erroneous judgements on the Clerk's personality. Chaucer the pilgrim depreciates him for the over-thin appearance of him and his horse. He expresses disdain at the Clerk's poor-quality worn apparel intending to insult him as though it makes him a lesser person when, in fact, this merely shows that the Clerk is not a hedonistic materialist and devotes his limited resources to more useful pursuits such as enhancing his knowledge. ...read more.

Conclusion

162), which is particularly inappropriate for a humble, selfless nun. The Prioress is described as "charitable and so pitous" because "she wolde weep, if that she saw a mous/Kaught in a trappe" (ll. 144-5). However, her charity is rather misplaced as noting is mentioned about her work as nun for the poor. She even displays her own ostentatious wealth by flaunting her showy jewels - she wears "a brooch of gold ful sheene" (l. 160). Of course, Chaucer the pilgrim simply sees this as being elegant and sophisticated. Throughout The General Prologue we see how Chaucer the pilgrim has been swayed and convinced by what the other pilgrims tell him. So much so that he reports qualities that are often the opposite of the true personalities of the characters he is describing. This ambiguity reveals a very clever sort of irony on behalf of the writer - while Chaucer the pilgrim is easily drawn in by their deliberate misrepresentations, it is up to the readers to see how wrong he is and draw their own, more accurate, conclusions. It shows many of the pilgrims to be very different people than those symbolised by the ideal qualities they want others to see. This astute technique is particularly effective in pointing out the hypocrisy and corruption in the Christian Church during Chaucer's time. Jonathan Hobbs - 1 - 28/04/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. How does Chaucer reveal his attitude towards the Church through his portrayal of the ...

    When, in the Knights tale Chaucer claims on line that he was 'a worthy man', he is speaking honestly. However in The Monk's tale Chaucer says on line 183 'And I seyde his opinion was good' which it clearly isn't.

  2. English society of Chaucer's time

    Amid the clamor of different characters and different points of view, he's reminding us that earthly truth has as many aspects as there are pilgrims, and that the pilgrims are trying to find a single truth that is impossible for mortals to find.

  1. Select two or three portraits from the General Prologue and discuss Chaucer's use of ...

    A prioress usually came form a upper class family, but even so this Prioress is over concerned with manners - even though the narrator seems to admire her upper class manners-, and by describing them at length her preoccupation which appearing upper-class makes her almost laughable; from her fake French accent through to her nasal singing.

  2. With reference to lines 91-112 and 163-290, how are the rivals Nicholas and Absalon ...

    girlish character with a high-pitched voice playing a villainous, authoritative man, which can be ridiculed by the Miller. Absalon's behaviour contrasts with Nicholas secretive nature and his solitude in his lonely bedroom, 'alonne, withouten any compaignie.' This creates the link with the Knights tale as Palamon is stuck in his

  1. Chaucer's Models of Authorship and his Anxiety of Influence in the Prologue to the ...

    This is a simple, humble, unpretentious flower - perhaps a metaphor for the English vernacular: numerous but unadorned. Chaucer blatantly announced in the prologue, his ultimate objective in the compilation of these tales was, 'The naked text in English to declare' (LGW 86).

  2. Dear Arch Bishop of Canterbury, (letter on Geoffry Chaucer's 'The General Prologue').

    The friar is not any better because even though he performs his religious duties, he misuses and takes advantage of his power "Yet wolde he have a ferthying, er he went". Chaucer's tone of language suggests to us that the friar is very greedy, he had a licence to beg and he always got more money than he needed.

  1. Geoffrey Chaucer provides humor in many of the tales from Canterbury Tales.

    Absalom then goes back into the town and gets a hot colter and returns to the house, and again he demands a kiss from Alison. This time, Nicholas decides to play the joke. "Nicholas quickly raised the window and thrust his ass far out...Nicholas let fly a fart with a

  2. Geoffrey Chaucer. Through the double narration it can be seen that the narrator ...

    some sort, proving him to be a writer and a member of the literate community. The pilgrim Chaucer and the poet Chaucer are not the same person but are both literate- setting them both in a small portion of medieval society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work