• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Commentary: Different?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Commentary: Different? The text is a monologue and inspired by two other kinds of texts. Alan Bennett's "Talking Heads" and (to a lesser extent) a text I discovered by Carol Ann Duffy called Comprehensive. It is present in the AQA English Language and Literature Anthology for 2003, 2004, 2005. The purpose of the text is as a means of entertaining an audience of a younger age (possibly in between the ages of 12-18) that are aware of the groups of people concerned (who are usually teenagers themselves) and also of their colloquialisms. This targets mostly those who are affected or annoyed by these types of people within their daily lives. (People in the Birmingham area of this age are more likely to understand the dialect). A person that fits into this category should hopefully find that the text is true to real life, and also quite amusing. The piece begins as one of Alan Bennett's "Talking Heads" would. As his works were written with the assumption that they would be visual for a watching audience as well as just for a listening audience, he wrote, what could be referred to as stage directions in italics at the top of each monologue. I have done this also as I think it sets the scene well and perhaps gives away more information about each character. ...read more.

Middle

person doesn't like football!?", when clearly Jack states that he has "got a season ticket for City" and he enjoys going to the games. "Filthy scum get outta Brum'" "Bopping" around in their "Rocky P's" Tom and Jack speak in an informal manner (shown above), as if they are talking to a friend instead of in a more impersonal way. They both presume that the listener understands the slang that they use. I felt that if they didn't do this, then my attitude towards the language that they use would seem less obvious. Despite their supposed initial feelings of being comfortable talking at a camera, towards the end of both monologues the boys both seem to feel threatened after arriving at the subject of befriending a member of the opposite group. At this point there are a lot of stops and stutterings marked by "...", and finally - seemingly as a means of escape - both come to an abrupt end and what looks like a farewell without an explanation of where they have to rush off to and why they have to go wherever they are going so quickly! In reality, the stereotype "greebo" is exactly as the "kev" describes and the stereotype "kev" is exactly how Jack describes, but their minds do not seem to be open enough or able to grasp the concept that not all of the opposing group are like this. ...read more.

Conclusion

I emphasise the separate groups pronunciation of words as a means of making the monologues appear more like spontaneous speech as (if the piece were to be acted out as it should be) this would be the way I would want the 'actors' to speak. I also tried to do this by changing the subject abruptly in various places throughout the monologues. i.e. ". It's never about the music with them, just baselines and how "tweaked" the snare drum is, whatever that means. So anyway, we decided that they were takin over too much in Birmingham so..." They accuse and criticise each other for doing the same things while oblivious to the fact that meanwhile members of the opposite group are accusing them of doing the same thing. For example, Jack says "It's never about the music with them" while earlier on in Toms monologue he says, "We go for the music, not to get 'wasted'" This insinuates of course that it is never about the music for "greebos" either. If we took both peoples word for it then neither of them listens to music because they want to listen to music. I don't though and find these accusations preposterous. I believe the way in which each person ends the conversation. The language that they both use is comedic and further helps me to convey how both groups rather weird variation of the English language baffles me. Despite this, ending their monologues in the ways that they do sums up both characters. 1,432 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English Monologue - Demons

    3 star(s)

    I'm ready to lose touch with my friends, close friends and family if I'm not curable which makes me feel I'm a monster... I need protection, life is better off the line. Nothing heard, nothing said...I can't even speak about it - cos' all my life is on my head.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Investigation into the Judgements of Slang

    4 star(s)

    play area ting inni* where you can just go cotch" The "cotch" derives from the Jamaican Creole, the use of glottal stops are denoted by asterisks and "Thing" has been pronounced with the voiceless dental plosive reflecting the rhythmic features of MEYD.

  1. Throughout July's People and A Passage to India a gulf in understanding between the ...

    in this case, July vents his anger at Maureen in his own language, a language she cannot understand in literal terms, but the import of which is all too clear. It is in the aftermath of this that Maureen abandons her family and flees.'4 This episode is of the utmost

  2. Creative writing and commentary. It was the year 2015 and Earth was exploring ...

    message came out over the speakers "Can all passengers please make sure that they are sitting comfortably with their seat belts fastened securely as we are about to launch" With that everybody on the shuttle gave off a big cheer.

  1. The Outsider - Shakespeare's Othello

    She also clearly states; "he is not baptized" in her rant of disgust. Grenouille's mysterious nature contributes to his image of an outsider in society. It gives the people of France more reason to somewhat fear Grenouille's strange presence therefore making him even more distinct from others.

  2. Coursework Commentary

    This makes the reader feel protective of the two lovers. In the conversation between the two, there are two main topics of discussion, Louisa's impossible existence and the upcoming war between the worlds. These topics are almost mixed together and the discussion constantly loops back to one or the other.

  1. Analysis of speeches by Sadat and Bandler

    Here the repetition of ?different? is used to relate to her diverse context and audience, and coupled with positive diction and an appeal to ethos, an effective speech is forming due to Bandler?s careful address to context and audience. Therefore, through careful consideration of audience and context each composer successfully allows for their speech to be effective.

  2. Text Commentary - Text 25 (Food Glorious Food Anthology)

    be viewed at first glance as a text to entertain which may encourage people to read on. A variety of sentence structures are used, there are a large amounts of simple sentences in the ?story? section which enable tension to be built up easily, ?Pam was a couple of feet behind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work