Commenting closely on the language and form, compare the poetry of Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen

Authors Avatar

Commenting closely on the language and form, compare the poetry of Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen

War   wör , n a state of conflict; a contest between states, or between parties within a state (civil war)  carried on by arms; any long-continued struggle…

Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen were two of the greatest poets in our history. Despite both dying before they reached the age of 30, they left behind a legacy of Britain’s greatest poems.  This essay will explore and comment closely on the language and form of both poets, compare styles and literary devices, and evaluate different sections of their poems, in order to point out the successes they had.

Rupert Brooke’s “The Soldier” and Wilfred Owen’s “Futility” may be both different in style, but they do have one thing in common. They are both about a dead soldier. Brooke’s sonnet is written in first person and it talks from the dead soldier’s point of view. It uses sensuous detail and personification to romanticise war. Owen’s poem, however, is much more “real” in that he writes from experience. From the soldier’s comrade’s point of view you almost feel more sympathy for him than for the man dead.  

Join now!

Lily Milton         Page         02/05/2007

In this poem, Brooke likes to use Pure rhyme, whereas, in “Futility” Owen uses Imperfect, Eye and Half Rhymes for effect. For example, here is an extract from “The Soldier

As you can see, Pure rhyme is abundant in this sonnet. This gives quite a “finished” effect, and makes you feel more at ease with the poem. As Brooke more often than not romanticises war, this is a good device to use. Owen uses quite an opposite effect in “Futility

Lily Milton         Page         02/05/2007

        

Owen uses this, also, to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay