• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Rupert Brooke's 'The Soldier' with Wilfred Owen's 'Dulce et Decorum Est'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Rupert Brooke's 'The Soldier' with Wilfred Owen's 'Dulce et Decorum Est' Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen are both poets who fought for England in the First World War and both base their poetic material almost entirely on the situation they were in. However, distinct differences can be seen in their individual approaches to their common theme of war. An example of this difference can be seen in the two poems The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est, by Rupert Brook and Wilfred Owen respectively. They are both concerned with the theme of war, but each gives out a completely different message to the reader as their own morals and interpretations of this theme oppose each other. The Soldier gives out an optimistic tone, making war out to be a peaceful and heroic act, whilst in Dulce et Decorum Est, the tone is more sombre and angry, making out the same war and situation that Dulce et Decorum Est is in, to be a grim and insufferable disease. Both the poets, Brooke and Owen, wrote in the First World War and were some of the fathers of World War poetry. Both the men entered the war at a very young age and both being strongly patriotic towards England. The Soldier was written in 1914, a year before Brook died, and Owen wrote Dulce et Decorum Est in 1917, three years after the First World War had started. ...read more.

Middle

A direct address to the readers is also used, using a persuasive technique, especially in the last stanza, for example in line 21, 'If you could hear...' and in line 25, 'My friend, you would not tell...' This is so that the reader would feel sympathetic towards him and the soldiers. It is almost as if Owen is begging the reader to understand. Through describing this man's tragic death and his burial, Wilfred Owen tries to change the views of the public. The use of fricatives symbolizes the harsh reality of war as by using fricatives, for example a hard 'c' is used in words such as 'corrupted' and 'cud', it becomes as though the reader can actually hear the person dying and so writes in a very vivid form. This soldier died by breathing in poisonous gas which resulted in him 'guttering, chocking and drowning.' Then Owen describes of how the man's dead body was treated no better than an animals as he was 'flung' into a wagon and they watched his 'white eyes writhing in his face.' This shows the pain he was in, as he was in the brink of death. The evil of war is also shown in line 20, where it says, 'like a devil sick of sin!' This is to illustrate that as devil is destined to commit evil until the end of time, it has come to the extent that even the devil is sick of the amount of evil and torture around it. ...read more.

Conclusion

By believing in this, Rupert Brooke makes himself believe that he should sacrifice his own life for England and by doing this he would be returning a favour of being born British and so believes it is an honour to go to war, and an even greater honour to die in battle for one's country and in return, portrays in his poem an image of one dying a painless death. Such a view is in the Victorian tradition of war which viewed it as a glorious and noble enterprise, with such poems as Tennyson's 'Change of the Light Brigade'. This patriotic fever was simply carried on by Brooke who still saw warfare in terms of duels and honour. Owen on the other hand witnessed twentieth century war in all its cruel destructiveness and as a consequence brought war poetry into the modern era. Therefore, it would be concluded that the only reason why the two poets have conflicting ideologies of war, is time. Brooke had died early on in the war and so wrote his poetry during the beginning of the war and his ideas of patriotism and honour in battle were still fresh. As for Owen, he lived to see most of the war, and saw the reality. The veil was lifted from his eyes. What he wrote, many could argue, was what should be known of war, but is perhaps best forgotten. YASIR SHAH ENGLISH - GCSE COURSE WORK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The World of words in Wilfred Owens Anthem For Doomed Youth and Dulce Et ...

    5 star(s)

    The onomatopoeia I stuttering rifles actually sounds like the guns, so you feel like you are in the battlefield. That feeling is continued, making you feel like there are endless gun shots coming towards you, with the alliteration 'riles' rapid rattle'.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Compare: 'The Soldier' by Rupert Brooke, 'Futility' by Wilfred Owen, and 'Anthem For Doomed ...

    4 star(s)

    Owen himself did not believe that their deaths should be devalued, but he perhaps felt that the sheer number of casualties reduced the impact of the passing of individual soldiers. The link with cattle is also due to the inhumane way the masses of fighters died.

  1. Compare and contrast "Disabled" by Wilfred Owen and "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke.

    first three lines of verse two reflects the soldier's vibrancy before the war. Also the word "budded" is used in the first three lines of verse two, which symbolises new life and not lifelessness as suggested in verse one. Furthermore, the last four lines of verse two contrast with the

  2. Comparison of 'The Soldier' was written by Wilfred Owen and 'Dulce et Decorum est' ...

    He owes his life to England. He owes a debt of gratitude towards England and he wants to repay the favour. He says that he was "a dust" and he accepts the fact that he and the other soldiers are disposable.

  1. Jessie Pope, Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen

    The last two lines of the poem are especially pro-war comments. Jessie Pope is making a final plea for men to join up. The last two lines state at what the whole poem is aiming at, what the poem is trying to say summed up in its last two lines

  2. Based on the Poem "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.

    This capitalises on the sexist attitude of the era where men were expected to take care of and protect their women. Pope has written this poem in four quatrains with a regular rhythm and rhyme scheme. This makes the poem more memorable.

  1. Dulce Et Decorum Est - review.

    This poem has a considerable effect on the reader, it shows how the torment of war is constant, already fighting to stay alive, struggling, desperately making their way back to their trenches. However it is not that easy when they are faced by muddy terrain, the threat of a rear attack and gas.

  2. The Theme of the Pity of War in "Dulce Et Decorum Est" and "Anthem ...

    cancer?, Owen paints horrific images in our head and emphasises further just how atrocious and terrible war really was, hidden behind patriotic jingoism. The poet strengthens his message of the pity and horrors of war in the last verse by emphasising the suffering of the soldier by referring to ?the wagon that we flung him in?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work