• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the different attitudes towards war that you have studied in the Martin anthology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q. Compare and contrast the different attitudes towards war that you have studied in the Martin anthology. War has many different viewpoints. Some say that going to war is an adventure, and a way of becoming a hero, but others - usually those who have experienced it - say otherwise. Many people have written poetry on war - some advertising war as a good thing, and others recalling their harrowing experiences. Jessie Pope was a poet who I will be writing about. Her poems can be described as propagandist. Another poet who was pro war was Rupert Brooke. Poets who were very anti-war included Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon. As mentioned, Jessie Pope was a poet who saw war as a good thing. In one of her poems called 'Who's for the game?' she portrays war as a sports game such as rugby: 'Who'll grip and tackle the job unafraid?' Pope encourages young men to sign up by making war sound really fun: 'Than lie low and be out of the fun'. Pope even makes the soldiers that don't sign up feel guilty by writing 'Your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she's looking and calling for you', and uses familiarities such as 'Come along, lads'. The purpose of this poem was to persuade young men to join the army. ...read more.

Middle

from the froth corrupted lungs' 'Dulce et decorum est' makes war sound like hell, totally unlike the rugby match that Jessie Pope made war out to be. At the end of his poem, Wilfred Owen sums up the poem to Jessie Pope in the words: 'My friend, you would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.' A poem that is very comparable to 'Dulce et decorum est' is 'God! How I hate you' by Arthur Graeme West. There are three main similarities between the two poems. Firstly, they are both anti-war poems, secondly the poems both mention pro-war poets, and finally, both poems give graphic images to the reader. 'God! How I hate you' begins by 'taking the mick' out of those like Brooke and Pope who wrote 'happy-clappy' poems about war, just like Owen did: 'God! How I hate you, you young cheerful men, Whose pious poetry blossoms on your graves As soon as you are in them'. He writes sarcastically, imitating them: '"Oh happy to have lived these epic days"'. Later in the poem West uses grim details to tell Brooke and Pope what war was really like: 'His neck against the back slope of the trench, And the rest doubled between, his head Smashed like an eggshell and the warm grey brain Spattered all bloody on the parados...' ...read more.

Conclusion

Owen compares the ways in which the soldiers died to the way a normal person would die: Firstly, the prayers are depicted as machine guns, because that is the only noise that comes from the soldier before he dies, so it is like his last prayer: 'Only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle can patter out their hasty orisons'. The singing choir is portrayed as the wailing shells that are going off around them when they die: 'The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells'. The candles around the coffin are illustrated as the glimmer from the soldiers' eyes that are around them: What candles may be held to speed them all? Not in the hands of boys but in their eyes shall shine the holy glimmers of goodbyes'. The flowers are depicted as the suffering relatives of the dead soldiers: 'Their flowers the tenderness of patient minds'. The two poems are both very poignant because they make you realise how the soldiers never got to say goodbye to their loved ones, or die peacefully. In conclusion there are many different opinions whether war is good or bad. I would most probably believe poems written by Owen and others who actually experienced war. These poems are more often than not anti-war, so are therefore more reliable. Poetry goes deeper than the facts because the poets tend to be writing their memories, as if it were a diary, so you get a very different picture of war when reading poetry than reading a textbook. Emma Donatantonio English Coursework - Poetry Comparison 11/12/07 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast attitudes to war illustrated in Jessie Pope’s ‘Who’s for the game?’ ...

    3 star(s)

    she refers to is, and it's 'You.' the readers. She uses the word 'You' to clearly emphasise who she is talking to. As the poem was published in the Daily Mail it would have been read by tens of thousands of people. Throughout the poem she uses simple language so that everyone can understand it and therefore it will have a widespread effect on the people.

  2. War poetry - different poets attitudes to war.

    like and how the soldiers felt: Shatter'd and sunder'd Then they rode back, but not, Not the six hundred. 'Hearing that his Friend was Coming Back from the War has been translated from Chinese into English. In English it doesn't really read as a poem, more like a diary.

  1. Jessie Pope, Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen

    Wilfred Owen has made this character up. However this is a true story for many people in the war. Wilfred Owen talks about the past by saying 'voices of boys rang saddening' and 'voices of play and pleasure.' He says that war has taken this away from this lad as

  2. Compare and contrast the presentation of war and the poets' attitudes towards war in ...

    This precise organization is how Jessie Pope pictures war, although imprecise, it is a pull factor for the reader, encouraging them to join the war. She makes war seem like a game, more specifically, a game of rugby, "the red crashing game of a fight".

  1. Explain the changing attitudes of civilians and British soldiers towards the War.

    Civilian life changed dramatically during the war. Strikes in factories were banned so that there could be no threat to the productions of arms or other wartime necessities. Many civil liberties that were taken for granted were temporarily suspended. The horror of the trenches was played down but after 1916

  2. The First World War changed the way that people thought about war and patriotism. ...

    This makes them nervous and so they find it difficult to sleep. In the first stanza, Owen uses the metaphor, "the merciless iced east winds that knive us..." He describes the winds as showing no mercy; he also personifies the wind by saying that it is kniving the soldiers.

  1. What attitudes to war have youfound in your reading of war poetry?

    It is believed that his outrageous glorification of Military exploits made poetry the instrument of jingoism, and that these views (shared by many) were in part responsible for the blind patriotism which whirled the British public into the Great War.

  2. Investigating all the combinations for the name Emma.

    Facts are also given neutrally, without showing any feeling. For instance, the four thousand Italians that survived the Germans and the British bombing "the ships that were taking them away to labour camps. Most were drowned in the hulls, but those who managed to leap into the sea were machine-gunned by the Germans [...] and their bodies left to float".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work