• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the different attitudes towards war that you have studied in the Martin anthology.

Extracts from this document...


Q. Compare and contrast the different attitudes towards war that you have studied in the Martin anthology. War has many different viewpoints. Some say that going to war is an adventure, and a way of becoming a hero, but others - usually those who have experienced it - say otherwise. Many people have written poetry on war - some advertising war as a good thing, and others recalling their harrowing experiences. Jessie Pope was a poet who I will be writing about. Her poems can be described as propagandist. Another poet who was pro war was Rupert Brooke. Poets who were very anti-war included Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon. As mentioned, Jessie Pope was a poet who saw war as a good thing. In one of her poems called 'Who's for the game?' she portrays war as a sports game such as rugby: 'Who'll grip and tackle the job unafraid?' Pope encourages young men to sign up by making war sound really fun: 'Than lie low and be out of the fun'. Pope even makes the soldiers that don't sign up feel guilty by writing 'Your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she's looking and calling for you', and uses familiarities such as 'Come along, lads'. The purpose of this poem was to persuade young men to join the army. ...read more.


from the froth corrupted lungs' 'Dulce et decorum est' makes war sound like hell, totally unlike the rugby match that Jessie Pope made war out to be. At the end of his poem, Wilfred Owen sums up the poem to Jessie Pope in the words: 'My friend, you would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.' A poem that is very comparable to 'Dulce et decorum est' is 'God! How I hate you' by Arthur Graeme West. There are three main similarities between the two poems. Firstly, they are both anti-war poems, secondly the poems both mention pro-war poets, and finally, both poems give graphic images to the reader. 'God! How I hate you' begins by 'taking the mick' out of those like Brooke and Pope who wrote 'happy-clappy' poems about war, just like Owen did: 'God! How I hate you, you young cheerful men, Whose pious poetry blossoms on your graves As soon as you are in them'. He writes sarcastically, imitating them: '"Oh happy to have lived these epic days"'. Later in the poem West uses grim details to tell Brooke and Pope what war was really like: 'His neck against the back slope of the trench, And the rest doubled between, his head Smashed like an eggshell and the warm grey brain Spattered all bloody on the parados...' ...read more.


Owen compares the ways in which the soldiers died to the way a normal person would die: Firstly, the prayers are depicted as machine guns, because that is the only noise that comes from the soldier before he dies, so it is like his last prayer: 'Only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle can patter out their hasty orisons'. The singing choir is portrayed as the wailing shells that are going off around them when they die: 'The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells'. The candles around the coffin are illustrated as the glimmer from the soldiers' eyes that are around them: What candles may be held to speed them all? Not in the hands of boys but in their eyes shall shine the holy glimmers of goodbyes'. The flowers are depicted as the suffering relatives of the dead soldiers: 'Their flowers the tenderness of patient minds'. The two poems are both very poignant because they make you realise how the soldiers never got to say goodbye to their loved ones, or die peacefully. In conclusion there are many different opinions whether war is good or bad. I would most probably believe poems written by Owen and others who actually experienced war. These poems are more often than not anti-war, so are therefore more reliable. Poetry goes deeper than the facts because the poets tend to be writing their memories, as if it were a diary, so you get a very different picture of war when reading poetry than reading a textbook. Emma Donatantonio English Coursework - Poetry Comparison 11/12/07 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. War poetry - different poets attitudes to war.

    it says in the poem:- But someone still was yelling out and stumbling, And flound'ring like a man in fire or lime . . . Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light, As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.

  2. The First World War changed the way that people thought about war and patriotism. ...

    He ends the first stanza with, "But nothing happens." The above quote is to be the start of a pattern of phrases that show that the soldiers feel that one day runs into the next and nothing ever happens. It is somewhat ironic as there is a lot happening yet

  1. Compare and contrast the presentation of war and the poets' attitudes towards war in ...

    He despised Jessie Pope and other poets who gave a false image of war and made it seem enjoyable and exciting, more like a game, whereas Owen saw the war from a first hand perspective, rather than from the relative safety of the Home Front and it wasn't how Pope described it.

  2. Did the Soldiers Themselves, Give a more Accurate Picture of Trench Life than Official ...

    I think this source is useful for showing how soldiers are likely to glorify events and also in explaining how dirty it could get in the trenches. Trench foot was one of the worst things a soldier could endure in the war.

  1. Jessie Pope, Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen

    their poetry for different reasons and had different attitudes towards the war. Rupert Brooke wrote his for himself and did not write it for propaganda purposes. He took the view that the war was an exciting new event, not because of the killing but because at war he believed there was peace.

  2. Compare and contrast the poems 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' by Wilfred Owen and 'The ...

    If Brooke had mentioned materialistic things like special rights, possession or power then it gives rise to the thought that his gratitude is questionable, because he has enjoyed privileges denied to others. In the second stanza, Brooke whole-heartedly declares that he will return to England what he has been given.

  1. Give a detailed consideration of poems from World War 1, looking at poems by ...

    The last verse is very patriotic. "Come along, lads - but you'll come on all right - For there's only one course to persue, Your country is up to her neck in a fight, And she's looking and calling for you."

  2. From the pre-1914 selection, choose two poems that show different attitudes towards war and ...

    of them as being heroic and to have fought strong and bravely. In reality the Light Brigade had to retreat without capturing the guns. Tennyson avoids all mention of retreat and focuses instead on the men's fighting skills. "they that had fought so well" Stanza six is bringing the poem to an end.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work