• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the use of tragedy in two or more plays:

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the use of tragedy in two or more plays: When the term 'tragedy' is used, certain plays are at the forefront of ones mind. There are, manifestly, Shakespeare's great tragedies - Othello, Macbeth, and Hamlet and of course King Lear; and in the time of ancient Greece, there is the great classic play - Sophocles' King Oedipus. The similarities at first seem great. Oedipus and Lear are Kings, and the themes dealt with in the plays are comparable, as are the questions they pose. Both Kings fall from their pinnacles. Oedipus finds out that he has committed incest and murdered his own flesh and blood. Whereas Lear degenerates from being a mighty ruler to a mad beggar. They are fallen heroes their hierarchy destroyed, reduced to mere men - a tragedy in itself to become loathed and ostracised. Tragedy tears us apart; it shatters our sense of the world and ourselves. The terrifying power of tragedy is suggested by Sir Philip Sidney, when he speaks, in An Apology for Poetry (1595), of high and excellent Tragedy, that openeth the greatest wounds, and show us forth the ulcers that are covered with tissue; that maketh kings fear to be tyrants, and tyrants manifest their tyrannical humours; that, with stirring the affects of admiration and commiseration, teacheth the uncertainty of this world and upon weak foundations gilden roofs are builded.... ...read more.


Their misjudgements come from their own character flaws, whereas Oedipus' misjudgements are fated due to his own lack of information. Gloucester wrongs Edgar by believing Edmond. Gloucester is given several chances to see through Edmond's charade, but is tricked by his bastard son into believing that Edgar is plotting his death. Gloucester knows both sons well enough; he has no reason to assume Edgar as the guilty party, other than Edmond's testimony. If he were thinking clearly he would be aware of this; however, because of his preference for his bastard son it does not occur to him to assume Edmond is lying. He does not wish to believe either son as evil. He is though, easily convinced. Again it is his character that causes this gross misjudgement not the lack of information. In virtually the same way Lear esteems Goneril and Regan's declarations of devotion over Cordelia's blunter statement of duty, even though Cordelia is as sincere as they are false. As their father he must surely be aware of their characters and be able to judge them fairly. Lear Asks: Which of you shall we say doth love us most, That we are largest bounty may extend Where nature doth with merit challenge? (Shakespeare, 5) He seems as though he is deliberately wronging Cordelia, in spite of his obvious affection for her. ...read more.


We cannot pin down the blame as we can in Lear and questions are left to hang without resolution. The same questions are asked in Lear as in Oedipus but appear less obvious than the former. In Lear the intense plot distracts us whereas we are confronted with them in Oedipus 'head on', because the action has already occurred. Therefore Lear seems to come to a more acceptable resolution. At the end of King Oedipus, Sophocles leaves one with the burden of unresolved issues. Whereas Shakespeare, though not coming to a resolution makes them more acceptable and less sad. Lear seems more cathartic than Oedipus and there seems to be less agony about its 'tragic nature'. At the time Oedipus was conceived, scholars and the masses that attended performances truly believed in the concept of the gods, fate and the inevitability of predestiny. It was the birth of classical concepts and the humanities. Shakespeare's Lear is written in a different era and borrows many ideas from Grecian concepts but pays homage to more modern concepts of the Elizabethan/Jacobean sensibilities. There are more romantic notions in Shakespeare whereas in Sophocles there is a more allegorical moral, although both provide didactic functions. The major theme of tragedy involves a mighty and respected figurehead dragged down from a great height by circumstance or fate to the human condition of pathos and suffering and is consequently reduced to everyman. Tragedy is the tool that awakens the audience's senses so we pity and empathise with the flawed hero. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The English Patient

    5 star(s)

    On this evening, Caravaggio watches Hana's legs as she walks: "her legs and thighs moved through the skirt of her frock as if it were thin water." Then, from Kip's point of view: "Hana moved alongside them, her hands in her pockets, the way Kip loved to see her walk."

  2. Compare and Contrast the presentation on Edmund and Edgar in Sheakespeare's King Lear

    Shakespeare's choice of language in Edmund's soliloquy reveals more about his character. The tone of this soliloquy is angry and bitter, as Edmunds feelings of deprivation are uncovered. Shakespeare uses repeated plosive sounds, 'With base? With baseness, bastardy? Base, base?'.

  1. The Use of The Four Elements in The Wars

    It is actually used against Robert in the form of a weapon during the war. This weapon was a flamethrower. A flamethrower is a weapon that spews out pressurized flammable gas in a controlled manner. Once ignited, the flamethrower becomes exactly what it sounds like: A weapon that shoots fire at it's victims.

  2. Analyse the ways in which Shakespeare uses dramatic conventions in his plays and why ...

    and appear well spoken, this links in with the idea of being someone you're not. Benedick has a two contrasting soliloquies in this scene, one at the start where he speaks about his dislike of Beatrice and also at the end of the scene when he speaks of how beautiful and intelligent she is.

  1. Compare and contrast the writers presentation of the consequences of obsessive love in: Othello, ...

    when Bangs tells Barbara that he fancies Sheba, she replies that Sheba 'likes much younger men' and adds about her 'unusually close relationship' with Connolly. I believe here Barbara must of felt threatened as Connolly likes Sheba and now so did Bangs, so what better way would it be to

  2. Compare Faustus and Everyman

    clowns,' they have to employ a certain level of intelligence and education to understand the symbolism and allegory present in the play. We can acknowledge the play of Doctor Faustus as one from the Elizabethan period as its verbs differ from modern day usage, with phrases such as "What see you?"

  1. Are Othello and Anakin Skywalker Tragic Heroes?

    Othello and Anakin each have personality flaws which are exploited by their enemies to bring about their fall. Othello is extremely insecure. He has risen from slavery to the high position he now holds, but he still feels inferior to those around him.

  2. The common theme of "Hamlet" and "Oedipus the King" is regicide, and self- destruction ...

    In both these plays, truth played a major role in the outcome. Hamlet became so engrossed in the truth; he was too hesitant and continued to second-guess himself throughout the play. He may have become king but because truth was so important to him Hamlet ended up dying as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work