• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the ways in which Frankenstein and one other Gothic novel explore the meaning of the 'monstrous'.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the ways in which Frankenstein and one other Gothic novel explore the meaning of the 'monstrous'. Frankenstein and the other novel I have chosen to analyse, Dracula, both contain creatures that can be seen as being monsters. However, both these novels describe and depict the characteristic of being monstrous, although the actual definition of the monstrous varies widely between the various extracts that can be taken, and between the two novels themselves. The monstrous can be perceived to mean a number of things, from simply the supernatural, the intelligence of the characters in question, to the physical appearance of something which is not what is usually expected, and can even be the moral issues that a character experiences. Both Frankenstein and Dracula are creatures which are 'abnormal', unnatural, even supernatural because indeed they do exist, but they technically should not because whereas Frankenstein is made from reanimated flesh, Dracula can take the life-force of another and use it to prolong the life of another which can be considered monstrous since it goes against the natural order of things. This why Jonathan wishes to send Dracula's soul 'for ever and ever into burning hell'; only then will the retribution against Dracula for all the cruelty be achieved. ...read more.


He recognises what he thinks is the 'monstrousness' in the creature, and even describes it as a 'monster' which 'gnashes its teeth'. This depersonalises the creature, and using emotive vocabulary tries to get the reader to agree with his perception, but yet Shelley at the same time is showing how quickly someone ordinary can become monstrous. After all, Victor has gone against the laws of nature, has gone against his 'child' and is even denying his creature its one desire to 'find a wife for his bosom' which as a request is not so monstrous. This conveys the fact that it is not merely the physical appearance of something that automatically categorises it as 'monstrous', but also whether or not they are natural, and their intelligence. However, in both of the two novels, the respective authors do seem to place a fair amount of emphasis on the physical appearance of the two creatures. Whether this is entirely fair is uncertain, because Victor can be seen as monstrous, and Renfield certainly is to some extent, with his wish to have life regardless of the source from whence it came: 'Life is all I want'. ...read more.


But of course the reaction to deeds done speak loudest of all, and by this, the creature can truly be seen as monstrous, because there is no regret, but even 'exultation and hellish triumph'. Morals, either the existence or non-existence of them, can be seen to be what truly define a being, and so since neither of the unnatural beings show much or any remorse, they can be said to be monstrous. The 'monstrous' attribute is determined by many things, such as morals, intelligence (and of course how this intelligence is used), whether something is of a 'natural' birth, and of course physical appearance. Both the novels mention all of these traits, in differing amounts, to show how the 'monstrous' is integral to not only a mere Gothic horror story, but also life in general. It is not purely the appearance of something which determines whether they are monstrous, and not even whether they are normal or not; the true answer lies deep within the soul, where only that being alone can ever truly know if they are monstrous or not. Intelligence may play a part in having a consciousness, but after that, it depends on that being and their willingness to change to become a normal member of society, and one that respects the unwritten laws by which we all live. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mary Shelly section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mary Shelly essays

  1. Who is the real monster in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein

    However, 'that cannot be' and the creature vows to 'cause hatred if (it) cannot inspire love'. There are numerous humane characteristics in the being's words, which express its longing to love and be loved. It sees no other meaning in life if love is not present.

  2. Frankenstien;In her 1831 introduction to the novel Shelley explained how she wanted to 'curdle ...

    When he is repeating the creation process he once again isolates and removes himself from society, again supporting his belief in a guilty conscience as well as giving Shelley opportunity to create a gothic atmosphere through victors surroundings. The isle on which Victor and the monster reside (in chapter twenty)

  1. [The] juxtaposition of the ghastly and the everyday suggests one of the defining characteristics ...

    Perhaps these feeling accumulated because science was and still is very experimental and these experiments often had fatal consequences. These fatalities are less frequent in modern times as we have precautions that must be undertaken, however, up to the mid 1900's experimental procedures were dangerous and often poorly pre-meditated.

  2. Shelley uses 'The Modern Prometheus' as a subtitle to the novel. Explore the ways ...

    He cuts himself off from his family and from any sort of social life in order to devote himself to his obsessional occupation of creating a creature. The obsessional part of Frankenstein's character is repeatedly shown: I was capable of a more intense application, and was more deeply smitten with the thirst for knowledge.

  1. Consider the roles and the importance of Safie in the novel - 'Frankenstein', Mary ...

    This almost implies beauty is like currency, and beauty gives you a worth in the social structure and the creature knows he is ugly and thus places a very low value on himself.

  2. The creatures shift in attitudes regarding society, justice, and injustice is finalized in the ...

    Frankenstein?s creature finally receives the justice he had been seeking as he stands over his creator?s lifeless body, but still feels sadness at his master?s passing. Victor was his last connection to the human world, a society that he had once been so envious of but now felt only contempt for.

  1. Human curiosity in "Frankenstein"

    Also, they wanted to get the source of energy through these transformations. Their goal was just a scientific knowledge about our world, and they did not think about possible consequences of their researches and discoveries. There were scientists that consciously considered the possibility of using energy of the nuclear transformations for creating terrible weapon.

  2. Consider the ways in which Mary Shelley uses different Gothic settings to contribute to ...

    Through the presentation of the eponym?s laboratory, Shelley leaves the reader in revulsion at the horrific workings of Dr Frankenstein. We learn of the narrators ?filthy workshop of creation? as well as the ?vaults and charnel houses? he frequents in order to obtain ?filthy? materials.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work