• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est and Shakespeare's Speech From Henry V.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est and Shakespeare's Speech From Henry V It is terribly ironic that in the current international crisis over war I may be analysing two pieces with very contrasting views on the subject. Where Shakespeare glorifies the art of war and the honour surrounding it, Owen devalues a respected Latin phrase, which tells of the honour of war. I will first interpret Owen's poem (Dulce et Decorum Est), and later move on to Shakespeare's piece, and finally compare the two. Owen, himself fought and died in the First World War, and in all his poetry, (which is all war poetry) he conveys the terrifying horror of war. Owen said "The poetry is in the pity" meaning that he did not worry about the popularity of his poems, it was just his means of communication to the public allowing him to transmit the lasting pain caused by war, and dispel any thoughts that war is full of pride and shining uniforms. He starts the first stanza describing the terrible state of the men, he conveys the men as gender less and old. The contrast of this from when they left, with boots gleaming, mood high and now "bent double like old beggars", and "cursed through sludge". This also contrasts greatly with the image of the men marching confidently, shoulders back and chest puffed out, instead they are bent over like old women. He also mentions "hags" this word is usually used to describe old women. In the next line Owen says "on the haunting flares we turned our backs" this tells us the terrible physical state of the ...read more.


He continues to depict the terrible image by using phrases such as "incurable sores on innocent tongues" and "froth-corrupted lungs", these create image of the body no longer being under the control of the man. The last two lines, are completely directed at the reader, playing on the guilt he has most certainly built up throughout the poem, he says "My friend" this is written in a sarcastic and bitter tone, were we are not really his friend, as we have put these men through these horrors. He then goes on " you would not tell with such high zest to children ardent for some desperate glory" this again is playing on the guilt of the reader. He then disgraces and devalues a very respected Latin line written by the old poet Ovid " Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori" this means "it is sweet and fitting to die for your native land". While devaluing this statement, he is also devaluing war in itself, and he uses this last verse in a last gasp effort to appeal to the reader in a much more obvious way than all the other verse, through grotesque images. The most important component to the last verse, is that the tension is built in tremendous fashion. He achieves this by using only a single sentence in the whole verse, of which you only get the full meaning at the end of the sentence, which is that it is not sweet and fitting to die for your native land. This is a superb ending, and leaves the reader exactly how he would have wanted, thinking how is it possible for countries in this day in age to go to war. ...read more.


Both use specific events in Owen's case it was the death of a man from a gas attack and for Henry it was the oncoming war. The man in the poem was completely anonymous leading the audience to believe that it could be anyone, even them, whereas in the speech there is constantly names mentioned, letting the audience warm to the characters. You can constantly feel Owen's hatred of war and spite of anyone who puts people through it, however Henry is one of these people instilling exactly what Owen ridicules, the honour of dying for your country. In the poem the men have lost everything that makes them human, whereas in the speech they are going to gain what every human wants the respect of his fellow species. The end of the poem is a monosyllabic pounding "my friend you would not tell with such high zest" instils the poet's hatred for war, whereas Henry's speech is obviously building to a climax. The poem starts bleak, and ends bleaker, however the speech starts bleak but ends on a triumphant note. I actually prefer the poem, it is the most inspiring poetry I have ever read, and it perfectly recreates the image of the man dying, and lets you feel the poets hatred for war. However a good speaker can change the mind of even the most stubborn person, or at least make them think. Owen I am sure would be disgusted that nearly a century on from his death in a war we would be facing another, he would be most disappointed that his poetry had no effect. I think that if everyone stepped back they could most certainly find another solution, however in today's impatient society they want everything now. Chris Gallagher ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The essay writer is very sensitive to the quite different sentiments of the 'voices' in these two texts. Quotations are well chosen, and often quite skillfully introduced into the sentence structure of the essay. The linguistic analysis is well conducted generally, with a good comparison of the thrust of the two works.

Sentence and paragraph structure are loose and punctuation is frequently inadequate. As the essay writer says, both of these texts are poetry but little is said to compare the poetic devices and the effects they have on the reader.

More could be said of the very different contexts. In the Battle of Agincourt, the fighting was over in the day (though it was one episode in the Hundred Year's War), in The First World War, the trench warfare dragged on for 4 years, hence the gradual erosion of morale and spirit.

3 stars

Marked by teacher Jeff Taylor 10/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the use of symbolism in the novel Fly Away Peter

    4 star(s)

    moment in the sun, and then topple symbolizes how things in life have their moment - their experience of life at the crest of the wave, but must eventually fall so as the cycle of life can continue. This is again described with the image of the surfer riding these

  2. Marked by a teacher

    A Comparison of "Who's for the Game" and "Dulce et Decorum est".

    3 star(s)

    "Who would rather come back with a crutch? Than lie low and be out of the fun" This phrase is saying if they joined they would get a little hurt. Like breaking a leg or something to that extent. It says "come back" this, suggests that they will all come home after the War.

  1. This paper describes a design-based effort to build an effective closed-system air standard gas ...

    When this assumption is utilized, the air-standard assumptions are called the cold-air-standard assumptions. A cycle for which the air-standard assumptions are applicable is frequently referred to as an air-standard cycle. The air-standard assumptions previously stated provide considerable simplification in the analysis without significantly deviating from the actual cycles.

  2. How does Wilfred Owen present the horror of war in 'Dulce et Decorum est'. ...

    Wilfred Owen puts dramatic similes into his poetry. "Like a devils face sick of sin" is quite dramatic and gives it an evil sound. I cannot imagine a devil being sick of sin, but I think that the face would e distorted and twisted. He also uses harsh constantan sounds.

  1. Analysis of "An Irish Airman foresees his Death" by W.B. Yeats

    The concept that the airman's life before the War seems totally insignificant in comparison with 'this life' (I presume this means his life as a soldier in the War), seems to be a recurring theme among literature of the period - I noticed this particularly in Remarque's novel "All quiet on the Western Front".

  2. The diffusion of Ammonia Gas

    is so close to the cotton wool that is soaked in ammonia solution. It takes a shorter time to turn the litmus paper blue when the angle is smaller because the ammonia solution on the cotton wool ran down the tube.

  1. Compare The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est

    However, Owes makes no reference to what follows death and this suggests that for him death is the end. The Soldier offers romantic view of death as natural sad peaceful and would be a comfort to people at home whereas.

  2. The Theme of the Pity of War in "Dulce Et Decorum Est" and "Anthem ...

    which has the effect of making the poem more chilling and shocking, as it is as if we are there experiencing the scenario ourselves. As well as describing the debilitating effects that the war has had on the men, Owen uses the graphic descriptions of an unexpected gas attack to demonstrate the tragedy and traumatic experiences of trench warfare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work