• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare pre twentieth century poem "The man he killed" by Thomas Hardy (1840-1928), and twentieth century poem "Dulce et Decorum est.", by Wilfred Owen.

Extracts from this document...


The pre Twentieth century poem I have chosen is, "The man he killed" by Thomas Hardy (1840-1928), and the poem I have chosen that was written after the Twentieth century is, "Dulce et Decorum est.", by Wilfred Owen. Both these poems are about war, life during and after these treacherous times, and its lasting effects. In Hardy's poem, the poet adopts the persons of a war veteran in the Boar war. The poem is about his actions in this war and their lasting effects. The poet talks of the person he shot, of how this person was just like him, "of hand like- just as I". How they could have met as friends in some "ancient inn" and could have shared a drink together, but instead they met as enemies, because they were on opposite sides in this battle. The language used backs up this statement; "I shot at him, as he at me". This indicates that the poet had to shoot this person as, it was what he was there to do and it was either himself or his victim who was to die. Then as the poem progresses, the poet tries to explain why he carried out the act, saying he, "shot him dead because- because he as my foe." This indicates that the poet sees the fact that this person was on the other side of the battlefield as a just reason to take his life away, but the break up in the sentence and the repeating of the word "because", indicates some hesitation in the poet's explanation. ...read more.


"All went lame, all blind Drunk with fatigue". Owen indicates to us that these men are so worn out, and so lost in their surroundings that they remain oblivious to the "hoots of gas-shells dropping softly behind them". Then Owen goes into describing the actions of the soldiers in a life or death situation. The pace of the poem speeds up dramatically. As the soldiers scurry to protect themselves from the gas shells that are raining down on them from above. Their actions are described as "an ecstasy of fumbling", indicating how this sudden rush, was of both, fear and adrenalin, as the men hurry to put on their masks. Then suddenly the pace of the poem slows right down, as the readers learn of a poor soldier who was to late. A frightening and graphic image is painted for the reader, who learns of the slow and painful death of a person who inhaled the fatal poison of the shell gas. "And floundering like a man in fire or lime". Then we are told how the other soldiers look on as their comrade drowns in his own body fluid, surrounded by the green light of the chlorine gas, "As under a green sea, I saw him drowning." Then the poet goes on to tell us how this image of, this persons death before him, comes back to him at night, haunting his dreams. He cannot escapes from the torment of the war. ...read more.


But as the poem progresses, and the reader becomes more familiar with the meaning of the poem, it may become apparent to them that the person Owen means, is those who advocate war, and uses such blind patriotic slogans such as this. Both poems are effective in bringing out the horrors of war, both during and after. They both describe to their readers how, war has so many lasting effects. So many lives are destroyed, either my deaths, or by peoples part in the war. Many soldiers come away from war situations mentally and physically scared, and find it hard to go back to a normal life routine, examples of this is in Owens poem, where we are told of how his sleep if affected by the images of the death of his fellow soldier. Personally I prefer the poem "Dulce et Decorum Est". I feel this poem has more life, and is more effective in its purpose, to bring across the horrors of war. I feel this poem is more personal to its audience and through the language he uses, the audience are able to paint a better visual picture of the scenes of war in the poem. Owen uses effective descriptions of the soldiers and the scenes, where as Hardy's language is quite vague and basic. I feel that Owens poem is different, and unique, the readers don't know what to expect, and don't know what is coming next. The title of the poem leads the reader into expecting to hear reasons why it is so rewarding to die for your country, and then find that the poem is about the complete opposite. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analysing Wilfred Owens' Poem Disabled.

    4 star(s)

    In lines 24-26, Tennyson expands the phrase that was used to end the first two stanzas: instead of the geographic "Valley of Death," he uses the metaphor "jaws of Death," and extends this metaphor with "mouth of hell." Treating death as the same thing as hell, and making both as

  2. Peer reviewed

    The World of words in Wilfred Owens Anthem For Doomed Youth and Dulce Et ...

    5 star(s)

    Having it separate really emphasizes the image of a terrified man, for whom there is no help. The mention of dreams shows us that Owen possibly has nightmares about this image. During the third stanza, the horrified soldier watches a fellow man suffocate to death because of a gas bomb.

  1. How do these pre twentieth century poets demonstrate different aspects of war, and convey ...

    "The Drum" by John Scott was written in 1782, and was reprinted during the Napoleonic wars of 1792-1815 and used to campaign against the war and death. Scott was a Quaker (A religious group for peace). Scott was anti-war and anti violence.

  2. Compariosn of pre 1914 and wilfred owen's poems

    One of Owen's most famous poems is "Dulce et Decorum est". The Latin title means "it is sweet and fitting to die for your country" and it is used ironically to anticipate an idealistic poem, but it is quite the opposite.

  1. Based on the Poem "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.

    In the beginning of the poem the troops were portrayed as "drunk with fatigue." With this you can almost imagine large numbers of people dragging their boots through the mud, tripping over their own shadow. Later in the poem when the gas was dropped, it painted a psychological image that would disturb the mind.

  2. From your reading of Dulce et decorum est and the sentry, what do you ...

    In the second stanza there is a sudden change in the mood. The pace unexpectedly speeds up and the sad, slow mood that was displayed previously is changed to a much faster, frantic mood. 'Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!' emphasises the speed of this section and that they need to move fast to survive.

  1. Consider the very different approaches to war presented in Wilfred Owen's poem

    In line eight, the sweat on the men's faces is personified, "Misery swelters." The sweat here is described as misery, misery that runs down the men's faces and they know it is there, the misery will never leave them. The sweat also shows their fear.

  2. The two poems I have chosen are "Dulce et decorum est" and "Disabled", both ...

    They were not but they took its development to the extreme and poured money into its production. There most feared and frequently used chemical was chlorine gas. The Germans found that when the wind came from behind them it went on towards the allied trenches.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work