• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the first and final soliloquies in Dr Faustus - is Faustus a hero or a villain?

Free essay example:

Compare the first and final soliloquies in Dr Faustus – is Faustus a hero or a villain?

The first and final soliloquy of Dr Faustus raises questions of Faustus’ intentions, character and motivations. They both raise important questions as to what Faustus wants to achieve and does he actually achieve what he sets about to do. Perhaps, most importantly they raise the question of whether Faustus turns into a helpless, redundant being or something much more impressive than he began.

        The first soliloquy, in contrast to the final, is very fluent and has a definitive structure due to the argument Faustus presents. It is written in blank verse iambic pentameter to give is a fast pacing and fluent tone, something which is used to a different effect in the final soliloquy. At this point we are shown Faustus in a moral crisis, one of many seen throughout the play, he is deliberating what he wants to achieve next in his life. Faustus has already accomplished many great things but it seems here he is eager to accomplish something far greater,

        “A great subject fitteth Faustus’ wit.”

The ambiguity of this line becomes a major theme throughout the play and makes or diminishes Faustus’ character from different view points, is he being ambitious or arrogant? His ambition is brought into question throughout the play with people seeing it as something which builds his character and also leads to greed and damnation.

        The mood and tone of the soliloquy is exciting, the audience is shown a knowledgeable and accomplished man considering what his next great achievement shall be, and by rejecting philosophy, medicine and law we are held in suspense, what can Faustus do next? In disregarding medicine he hints are immortality,

“Yet art thou still but Faustus and a man.”

 His logical and systematic approach to his “crisis” does not give us any concern for Faustus as he appears to be a knowledgeable man.

        However, Faustus quickly declines from this and when picking up Jerome’s Bible fails to see anything positive on the pages, he appears to be only seeing what he wants to see and omits anything positive,

“Stipendium peccqati mors est. Ha! Stipendium, etc. The reward of sin is death…”

When he reads this however, he fails to read the next line which talks of repentance and mercy from God. This decline in logical thought seemingly leads to his devotion into black magic,

        “…necromantic books are heavenly…”

Now Faustus appears to be captivated and intent on following the path of magic, he is dismissing religion and there is irony in his use of religious words in the same sentence as ‘necromancy’.

        The final soliloquy is shown to an audience as if it is Faustus’ final hour on Earth and the theme of time here is used through the structure of the soliloquy and language used.

        Blank verse iambic pentameter is used here to illustrate how time is quickly approaching and closing in on Faustus, its fluency allows for no word to be faltered and no obstacles for the hour to come. Ironically, the use of the Latin phrase,

        “O lente lente currute noctis equi!”

by Faustus translating into,

        “Run slowly, slowly, horses of the night…”

is from a poem about a lover wanting to prolong the night he is spending with his mistress.

        Faustus’ mood and tone in the final soliloquy is very different to the first, Faustus appears to be struggling with his final hour upon Earth and is almost begging for more time,

        “A year, a month, a week, a natural day.”

This decline in length of time throughout the line also represents how little time Faustus still actually has.

        The ambiguity from the first soliloquy is also continued through the final and could be seen as more prominent with a number of things having different meanings attached around them. In the first soliloquy he deceives himself into believing that only negative things are contained in the Bible any perhaps Hell doesn’t exist but he still doesn’t repent here even though Hell is moments away. This following quote however could indicate an outside force is preventing Faustus from being able to repent,

        “O, I’ll leap up to my God! Who pulls me down?”

Is Faustus being physically held down here or is he actually holding himself back as he still doesn’t REALLY want to repent? Marlowe could be suggesting here that Faustus is still deluded and having served Lucifer for so long cannot break free.

        The final soliloquy brings up an important argument for critics, is Faustus here a hero or a villain? Cleanth Brooks commented on Faustus’ poetry and how Faustus at the end still maintains dignity,

        “Faustus at the end is still a man, not a cringing wretch, the poetry saves him from abjectness… he maintains to the end his individuality of mind…”

Faustus does take responsibility for his actions during the final soliloquy,

        “curse thyself”

and the moving poetry of his final hour is said with dignity. His ambition and aspirations in this aspect have not been in vain, he has achieved what he set out to do and not repenting shows how he doesn’t regret this.

        However, the argument that Faustus’ bargain with Lucifer and his desire for immortality has in the end led to his downfall is also another possibility. In a certain light it could be seen that Faustus is a coward, despairing of his choices and terrified. J B Steane criticizes Faustus,

        “in the end he cowers, and hides…”

He seems to take responsibility for his own actions as seen above but momentarily after turns this around onto Lucifer,

        “curse Lucifer.”

Faustus is now trapped by the time is longed for, his sanity is also brought into question with the use of elements,

        “Now body, turn to air.”

        “O soul, be changed into little water drops.”

He appears to believe he can hide from Lucifer in the air and water which are not feasible.

        To conclude the first and final soliloquies both provide excellent insights and questions of Faustus’ character and thoughts for the audience. The also conjure an question of whether Faustus is a hero or a villain and constant ambiguity, throughout this play, provides excellent arguments for both sides.

Laura Williams

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christopher Marlowe section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level English Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Christopher Marlowe essays

  1. Comment on the relationship between the comic and serious material in Dr Faustus.

    because the Ostlers have almost the same magical ability as him and for this pathetic amount of power he will be damned to suffer eternal agony in hell! Scene nine shows Faustus conjuring tricks to impress the Emperor Charles V.

  2. Analysis of Faustus Soliloquy.

    The word 'end' is simply repeated and emphasised, this increases tension significantly as this is what he is actually trying to avoid the 'end'. In demonstrating how he has already been successful as a doctor, he reveals a fascinating and highly respectable fact.

  1. In what ways and with what effects does 'Dr. Faustus' question the acquisition and ...

    This human quality of great ambition and greed for power and wealth is his hamartia or fatal flaw, before he makes the pact it is evident that he knows that he is only human; 'Yet art thou still but Faustus, and a man' 9 (i.

  2. Do Renaissance texts deal primarily with Renaissance concerns, or with universal human emotions and ...

    Harry Levin writes in Christopher Marlowe: The Overreacher, that the first soliloquy is 'no mere reckoning of accounts but an inventory of the Renaissance mind'. Roma Gill states that Faustus is 'the epitome of Renaissance aspiration'. I would agree that Faustus is a true Renaissance man - a great scholar;

  1. What does the play show us about attitudes to sin and damnation?

    Faustus himself realises that he's made a mistake when Mephastophilis gives him books with insufficient information. Faustus main aim was to gain power and we see that Faustus gains no power and is under the control of Lucifer, and is actually low in the hierarchy of hell when he asks Mephastophilis, "Now tell me what says Lucifer thy Lord?"

  2. "In Dr Faustus Marlowe is only incidentally concerned with the state of Faustus' soul: ...

    His character's downfall is due to the fact that he is a human; and the reason this causes his downfall is because of his natural animalistic instincts to gain power. This is something that a humanist would loath to be said, Renaissance Humanists 'tended to emphasise the values achievable by human beings' (Abram, 83)

  1. 'Compare the ways that Marlowe and Chaucer present the theme of sin in 'Dr ...

    However, unlike Chaucer, Marlowe does not present Faustus as being a character wholly drenched in sin. Faustus is far more wavering, and indeed has many occasions in the play where he is unsure about what he is doing. This leads the audience to develop a somewhat sympathetic relationship with Faustus, which is totally different from our condemnation of the Pardoner.

  2. Role of the Chorus and its effect on the audience, as seen in Dr ...

    The irony here is that inspite of excelling in matters of theology; he ignores the very basic fundamentals of the Christian faith and in doing so leads to his own undoing. An apt comparison is quoted in the following line mentioned in the last scene of the play, 'cut is the branch that might have grown full straight'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work