"Compare the way Shakespeare presents Hamlet's 'antic disposition' to the way Ophelia's madness is presented to us in Act V."

Authors Avatar

SHAMIMA SHALLY            L6ZB

“Compare the way Shakespeare presents Hamlet’s ‘antic disposition’ to the way Ophelia’s madness is presented to us in Act V.”

In this play, Hamlet, Shakespeare shows us the different ways that madness can be portrayed and the various ways that others surrounding the central characters can perceive it.

From the beginning it is explained that Hamlet would “put an antic disposition on” and this signifies that Hamlet’s madness would just be an act, not something that is actually true. Hamlet confides in Horatio and asks him not to look knowingly if he sees Hamlet behaving oddly by saying “some doubtful phrase” that might be “ambiguous” in its meaning. This immediately reinforces the notion that Hamlet is only play acting his apparent madness and in actual fact, is sane. Shakespeare presents Hamlet’s “antic disposition” as a means for Hamlet to bide his time and figure out how to avenge his father’s murder “by a brothers hand.” Hamlet’s madness is not meant to be seen as madness by us, but as something that has a purpose i.e. it could enable Hamlet to kill Claudius and it could be perceived by others that the killing was unintentional and was because of Hamlet’s “madness”.

Join now!

However, in the case of Ophelia, Shakespeare presents her form of madness as something that is real and tangible. She has a reason to be mad; her father is “dead and gone.” Shakespeare enforces the idea that Ophelia really is mad by having her enter in Act 4 Scene 5 “distracted” and singing a song about the death of her father. Ophelia’s madness is supported by what the gentleman says to Gertrude at the beginning of Act 4 Scene 5 about Ophelia’s state of mind; that she “winks and nods and gestures” and that “her speech is nothing, yet ...

This is a preview of the whole essay