Compare what we learn about Hamlet in private and in public.

Authors Avatar

Compare what we learn about Hamlet in private and in public.

In the play ‘Hamlet’, we see conflicts in Shakespeare’s portrayal of Hamlet’s personality, specifically between Hamlet’s public appearances, and when in private or with people very close to him (Horatio, Ophelia and Gertrude, his friend, lover and mother). These inconsistencies make us unsure if he is acting from feigned madness after finding out his father was murdered, or simply if he has been driven crazy by the truth of the situation. In this essay I will explore what we learn about Hamlet in public and private and suggest causes or reasons to explain the contrasting ways he behaves. I will also explore how Shakespeare’s audience would have reacted to the play and also how a modern audience might see differently.

        

In private we see Hamlets reasoned arguments and how they contrast to his emotional impulses and hysteria in public. An example of a reasoned argument is 3, I, 56 (act three, scene one, line 56) ‘to be or not to be, that is the question’. The argument occurs because Hamlet is considering suicide to end his problems, and is a pivotal moment in the play and one of the most famous. Shakespeare emphasises the huge decision of whether to take ones own life by almost simplifying the situation, stating obviously if it is better to live, ‘to be’ or simply not ‘to be’. We also see his sense of impartiality during his private arguments, viewing the situation as if he was an observer and rarely using ‘I’. These days, an audience would be moved by Hamlets obvious show of emotion and inner turmoil, and would likely sympathise with him. An audience of Shakespeare’s time may have reacted differently. The audience might believe he is a sinner for even contemplating suicide and be furious and un-sympathetic towards him, or it might have the opposite effect and emphasise the feeling he is feeling, and get the character more pity then nowadays as suicide was a much larger and more powerful thing. An example of emotion impulse is shown with his very emotional talk with Ophelia 3, I, 117 where he totally contradicts himself by saying ‘I loved you once’ and then ‘I loved you not’ a few seconds later. He may have said this for a number of reasons. One possibility is he is trying to feign madness, either because he thinks he is being watched or to protect Ophelia. Another reason could be he is unsure if he loves her or not, and is confused, and the final reason is that he could be mad. Shakespeare shows Hamlets emotional impulses using Ophelia as the subject, with Hamlet using beauty and honesty as a paradox and strong and hurtful statements that he doesn’t love her, even though we know he does not mean them. His emotion impulses are different to his reasoned arguments as they are contradictory and make little or no sense, and are not at all impartial like his arguments in private. In Shakespeare’s time an audience would question Hamlets sanity and pity Ophelia, as would an audience in modern times, although we would probably react more strongly to the cruel treatment of Ophelia.

Join now!

        

The second point is Hamlets delay to act in private in contrast to his impulsive actions in public. Hamlet appears to be, in private, uncertain and slow to act on what he is meant to do, especially about the killing of Claudius to avenge his father. This is shown in 3, IV, 106 where he apologises to his fathers ghost for being so slow to act and do anything. This shows two things, one Hamlet knows he is slow and uncertain and secondly the ghost is aware of his ‘almost blunted purpose’. Hamlet is hesitant to kill, as it ...

This is a preview of the whole essay