Comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar In king Lear.

Authors Avatar

Donna Sales                                                                                                        10/05/07                                  

KING LEAR

In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar. In king Lear, appearances, station and how what others think influences our actions are examined through relationships found in family and services: father and child; nobleman and servant. Even though we believe that what we look like and what we say are reflections of who we are. Shakespeare in King Lear shows that appearances and words are ever deceiving and are not clear indications of the soul or the mind.

As we go through the play we begin to see the differences between both the characters. Edmund being the bastard son turns out to be dishonest, deceitful, greedy and very cunning Edmund is the younger and natural or illegitimate son of the Earl of Gloucester.

Edmund is energetic and ambitious; he feels that he has been denied the advantages to which his appearance and abilities ought to entitle him. Edgar being the legitimate son turns out to be honest and loving towards his father and every one he comes across. I will also discuss the function of Edmund.

At the beginning of the play (I.1.39-51) in King Lear’s palace we see the earl of Gloucester and the earl of Kent discussing how Gloucester loves his two sons equally: Edmund being the bastard son and also the elder son and Edgar is the legitimate son. Although he loves both sons, Edgar is the heir.

Join now!

So at the beginning we see that Gloucester thinks of them both as his own children, he doesn’t push Edmund out because he is the bastard son he treats him just the same as his own son. Then the next we see of Edmund is in the Earl of Gloucester’s castle He declares: "Thou, Nature, art my goddess" (I.2.1-22) and rejects the customs of the society that has rejected him. He mocks the idea that the stars are in any way responsible for his character (I.2.125-30). Edmund sees himself as virtually an outlaw, and sets himself in opposition to legitimacy ...

This is a preview of the whole essay