• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Consider Laertes's contribution to the theme of revenge.' Hamlet

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Consider Laertes's contribution to the theme of revenge.' -----Hamlet Of the various parallels between Hamlet and Laertes is one of the most telling. From the beginning of the play we see the two in comparable situations, each young men of the court, each seeking university, each spied on by Polonius, each (it would appear) loving Ophelia, in different ways. Therefore, when Laertes finds himself in Hamlet's position of having a father murdered, the audience watches with interest to see how he will react, and how this will compare with Hamlet's behaviour in the same situation. In fact, although Hamlet points out that: 'by the image of my cause I can see The portraiture of his' Laertes reaction to murder of his father is very different from hamlet's, and indeed he is everything which Hamlet rebukes himself for failing to b. He forms the very epitome of a traditional avenger, and almost everything he does forms a contrast with what Hamlet does not do. Immediately as he returns to the court 'in a riotous head', having recruited 'a rabble', to aid him in his revenge. ...read more.

Middle

Laertes falls into the same category as Fortinbras, who with his 'unimproved mettle hot and full' seeks revenge on Denmark for winning and taking control of what had been his father's lands, and Pyrrhus, who brutally kills an old and defenceless man in the name of revenge. All these characters' unhesitating and decisive action, and what seems to be their lack of fear at the consequences, throw Hamlet's indecisiveness very much into relief, for whilst he can only 'unpack (his) heart with words', they can 'sweep...to revenge' as he longs to. However, it is \Claudius, not Laertes, who actually states that 'Revenge should have no bounds', which is not only ironic, since it is Hamlet's hesitation alone which has saved him so far, but - I feel - also has sinister undertones, since one would hardly have put such words into the mouth of the clearest villain of the play without implying that this sentiment is also, somehow, villainous. Of course, as Claudius is here manipulating Laertes' strong desire for revenge, it would be unwise to attach too much importance to this point, but it is nevertheless interesting to examine our attitude to Laertes' attitude towards revenge as opposed to Hamlet's. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this rage, this refusal to reason calmly and to reflect on what has happened, allows the slippery Claudius to manipulate Laertes for his own ends, leading to the treachery which destroys Claudius and Laertes themselves, and Gertrude, as well Hamlet. Ultimately, there is a certain nobility t be found in the exchange of forgiveness between hamlet and Laertes (the final link the latter's assurance that: 'Mine and my father's death come not upon thee, Nor thine on me!' Which is greater than Laertes' revengeful triumph over Hamlet. This is not to say that Shakespeare's presentation of Laertes serves entirely as an indictment of the process of revenge. Both hamlet and Laertes speak of the 'honour' of revenge, and finally does kill Claudius, that he is 'justly served.' However, I can feel that considering Laertes' contribution to the theme of revenge is only useful when seen alongside hamlet's reaction to the same theme, and perhaps this portrayal of a traditional avenger who is only useful when seen alongside hamlet's reaction to the same theme, and perhaps this portrayal of a traditional avenger who is rash, manipulative and finally self-destructive, allows us to see hamlet in a more favourable light when he is unable to assume the same role as traditional avenger. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hamlet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explore the presentation of revenge in 'Hamlet'.

    4 star(s)

    himself for his inaction, 'makes us rather bear those ills we have than fly to others that we know not of'. The problem for Hamlet is that the murder is too close to home, so he is unable to define the boundaries between personal and public.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Hamlet - It's hard to define what revenge actually is.

    3 star(s)

    This brings me onto my next character analysis, Claudius. Claudius is the reason that the whole main problem started in the first place. He is a very jealous person. We can tell this by the way he killed King Hamlet (his brother) and married his brother's widow, the Queen, Gertrude. This is a very jealous act to carry out.

  1. Compare and Contrast theCharacters Hamlet and Laertes.

    "Now might I do it, now 'a goes to heaven, And so am I reveng'd. That would be scann'd: A villain kills my father, and for that I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven". In this scene Hamlet refuses to kill Claudius while he is praying

  2. Comparing the revengers Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet.

    and speaks of it in a similar way to Hamlet when Hamlet learnt of how his father was killed in Act I, Scene V.

  1. Explore how Shakespeare examines the theme of revenge in Hamlet.

    The audience will though be able to sympathise and understand why Hamlet chose to not murder Claudius when he had the chance. This is because it was believed in the Elizabethan period that if you died when praying you would go 'to heaven'.

  2. Explore the differences in the ways Hamlet and Laertes go about seeking revenge

    Among the many aphorisms given by Polonius, he warns Laertes too not "give any unproportioned thought his act; Later on in the play, we can of course, see that Laertes ignores this heartfelt piece of advice when seeking revenge on Hamlet.

  1. "Hamlet is better at talking about delay than he is at doing it. Consider ...

    However, towards the end of the play he begins to voice the opinion that after death there is nothing. "Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander returneth to dust; the dust is earth..." This shows the influences of Montaigne. Montaigne was a French writer who died whilst Shakespeare was in his late twenties, whose works leant towards Epicureanism.

  2. Criticism on Hamlet

    not permanent, sweet not lasting, The perfume and suppliance of a minute - No more! - she replies with a kind of half-consciousness, No more but so? LAERTES. Think it no more. He concludes his admonition with that most beautiful passage, in which the soundest sense, the most excellent advice,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work