• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

Consider the role of the Fool in King Lear. How important is he to the play as a whole?

Extracts from this document...


King Lear Essay Question Consider the role of the Fool in King Lear. How important is he to the play as a whole? How has the role been treated by different critics and in different performances? How might the role reflect the culture of Shakespeare's time? How would you prefer the role of the Fool to be performed? The Fool is considered an important character in the play even though he is not a major participant in events witnessed. His comments, full of ironic insight, provide wisdom and reasoning for Lear at times of need. He generally plays three major roles; Lear's inner - conscience, represents Lear's alter ego and plays a dramatic chorus. The way the character is portrayed also provides us with a social commentator and vehicle for pathos. Although the Fool may seem strange to us, an Elizabethan audience would have greeted the Fool with great familiarity. The position was a historic one in Shakespeare's time, with the monarch appointing an official court jester (Fool). In conventional drama of the day he was a hold over from morality plays, with his role-becoming classic. His role had established characteristics and responsibilities. ...read more.


By contrast Grigori Kozintsev 1970 film version of Lear keeps the Fool in the play till the end by symbolizing the continuation of life in the sound of a flute he plays (Kozintsev, 198, Foakes, 60-1). The critics Orwell and Tolstoy also had contrasting opinions, with Tolstoy seeing no justification for the presence of the Fool, and Orwell seeing the Fool as integral to the play. This shows directors and critics being anxious about the sudden disappearance of the Fool from Act 3. The disappearance could be justified as Lear has gone mad by this time and cannot relate to the Fool's wit, wordplay etc. Another explanation for his disappearance could be interpreted from Lear's ambiguous line, "And my poor Fool is hanged" (Act 5, Sc 3), where he clearly relates to Cordelia, but recalls the Fool also. This brings us back to the fact of the association of the Fool as Cordelia's representative. Personally I believe that he is important and should be considered a major character, and definitely not cast out of the play. If he were to be taken out it would damage the balance of tragedy verses comedy that has been set up by Shakespeare, which would result in a loss of audience. ...read more.


We derive then from the Fool's honesty an ironic perspective on Lear's situation which maintains that his remarks are as much for the audience, as for on stage consumption. It is clear that Lear's retirement and his generosity in dividing the kingdom are in themselves foolish decisions; the Fool just states the obvious to us. But the Fool does more than that, he derives a more complex view of Lear's character and situation than any other character in the play. Through his wordplay, what seems like wisdom from one point of view, is folly from another, as the Fool brings out in his advice to Kent that it would be wise to abandon Lear, "When a wise man gives thee better counsel give me mine again; I would have none but knaves follow it, since a fool gives it" (Act 2, Sc2). I see the Fool as a channel for many of the play's multiple perspectives, which have no value fixed, and leave no character unscathed. He is more than what he is thought to be because Shakespeare over steps the regular Fools' boundaries. I feel Shakespeare uses the Fool to bring out the point about human actions and values, a point that enriches the whole play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay has many strengths. It is generally well written and well structured. Effective reference is made to background reading and to productions of the play, and there is a strong sense of the writer's engagement with the text. The questions posed by the essay title are confidently discussed.
Quotation technique is rather less confidently handled. A quotation should always makes sense to the reader, and this sometimes necessitates setting the quotation more firmly in context and ensuring grammatical integration into the sentence as a whole.

Marked by teacher Val Shore 14/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effectively does Shakespeare present Lear's loss of power in the play?

    4 star(s)

    Their language is full of exaggerated flattery in an appeal to Lear's ego. He holds the power so they need to impress him. Gonerill claims to love Lear "more than word can wield the matter" with "a love that makes breath poor, and speech unable", whilst Regan states that Gonerill

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Villains in King Lear

    At first, Regan seems like less of a villain than her sister. After all, she does suggest that they "further think of it" (1.1.354) regarding what to do with their father, whereas Goneril thinks that any action must take place immediately.

  1. Discuss the importance of the storm scenes in "King Lear" .

    this is a stark contrast to how we see the King at beginning of the play, the wrathful "dragon". Argument 4: The storm may also symbolize some kind of divine justice, as if nature itself is angry about the events in the play.

  2. King Lear as a Tragic Hero

    If he was a perfect person, it would be hard for us to justify the misfortunes that he counters. Moreover, if he was a completely evil person, we would not be afraid that we may experience a fate as his.

  1. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    the Gods, his character also despises people like Edgar, because of his legitimacy; all this is also shown in his language. Edmund brandishes a forged letter designed to dispossess Edgar and secure his position fore himself. Edmund allows Gloucester an 'accidental' sight of the letter and succeeds in arousing his suspicions.

  2. Comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar In king Lear.

    He made Edgar his enemy, he embraced force and deceit as methods; and now the disguised Edgar has conquered him by force. We should remember how he alleged Edgar's sword had wounded him in II.2.

  1. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    By getting his father's eyes gauged out and having his brother banished as well as killing Lear and Cordelia, Edmund is immediately thought to be a malicious man; a Machiavellian. The main role however of the bastard Edmund is that he is the evil in the battle of Good vs.

  2. King Lear. The theme of disorder is one of the main and important issues ...

    The use of interrogatives and short sentences, 'Where have I been? Where am I? Fair daylight?' is used as a dramatic device to show us that by Cordelia coming back she is able to restore order, sanity and peace to Lear, giving Lear his kingship and his return to sanity,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work