• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critical Analysis of Huckleberry Fin

Extracts from this document...


American Literature Critical Analysis of Huckleberry Finn Marina Pindar In outlawing reading for motive, moral, and plot, the notice proleptically--if unsuccessfully--attempts to ward off what in fact has become an unquestioned assumption behind most interpretations of Huckleberry Finn, namely, the premise that the text affords a critique of its extraliterary context by inveighing against the inequities of racism. In Mark Twain: The Fate of Humor James M. Cox analyzes why such readings of the novel are problematic. His contention, anomalous with respect to Mark Twain criticism in general, is that the novel mounts an attack against conscience, specifically the conscience of the moral reader. He locates this attack in the last ten chapters of the novel--the famous Phelps farm episode--and maintains that the discomfort and disapproval readers feel about Tom's cruelty toward Jim stems from their own identification with Tom: If the reader sees in Tom's performance a rather shabby and safe bit of play, he is seeing no more than the exposure of the approval with which he watched Huck operate. For if Tom is rather contemptibly setting a free slave free, what after all is the reader doing, who begins the book after the fact of the Civil War? . . . when Tom proclaims to the assembled throng who have witnessed his performance that Jim `is as free as any creature that walks this earth,' he is an exposed embodiment of the complacent moral sentiment on which the reader has relied throughout the book. And to the extent the reader has indulged the complacency he will be disturbed by the ending.[2] Cox proceeds to move his argument to a more general level by showing how the novel exposes the principle upon which morality, and its internalized representative, conscience, are constructed. As "an agent of aggression--aggression against the self or against another," conscience deprives the individual of free choice and subjects him or her to painful restraint (Cox, Mark Twain, p. ...read more.


But to speak of the novel in these terms is to beg the point because, as the opening notice suggests, the novel departs from the assumption that moral judgments are indistinguishable from the process by which we make sense. In what follows I will argue that the novel neither celebrates nor laments the inevitability of conscience but rather explores the interplay between morality and sense making, conscience and cognition. It does this by revealing how the (moral) process of identification--with either the fictions imposed by others or with fictions of one's own creation--provides the foundation for nothing less than human identity and cognition.[5] {12} The famous crisis-of-conscience scene paradigmatically brings together these issues. In this scene Huck has just written Miss Watson a note telling her where Jim can be found. He is about to pray but hesitates for a moment: But I didn't do it straight off, but laid the paper down and set there thinking; thinking how good it was all this happened so, and how near I come to being lost and going to hell. And went on thinking. And got to thinking over our trip down the river; and I see Jim before me, all the time, in the day, and in the night-time, sometimes moonlight, sometimes storms, and we a floating along, talking, and singing, and laughing. But somehow I couldn't seem to strike no places to harden me against him, but only the other kind. I'd see him standing my watch on top of his'n, stead of calling me--so I could go on sleeping; and see him how glad he was when I come back out of the fog; and when I come to him again in the swamp, up there where the feud was; and such-like times; and would always call me honey, and pet me, and do everything he could think of for me, and how good he always was; and at last I struck the time I saved him by telling the men we had ...read more.


While the novel does not suggest that the distorting projections of narcissism can be avoided altogether, it does seem to imply that such projections are enslaving if their origins in the fantasizing subject, as well as the difference between them and the objects they transfigure, are not recognized. {22} Structurally the novel reinforces this idea by complying with the formal requirements of plot and also testing the limits of those requirements through a complex use of irony. Despite the fact that the two key pieces of information generating the suspense of the narrative--the death of Pap and Jim's freedom--are only made explicit at the conclusion of the novel, the text does offer certain submerged indications that the overt intentionality of Huck and Jim's journey is a mere convention, a structurally necessary, if hollow, plot device. It has been pointed out many times before that while Jim claims he is escaping from his servitude, the direction of his flight indicates otherwise: he travels south, into the region of slavery, toward Cairo--the lexicography of which suggests the biblical land of slavery, Egypt. Critics have attempted to account for this inconsistency by attributing it to a contradiction in Mark Twain's overall project. Smith, for example, writes, "drifting downstream with the current . . . could not be reconciled with the plan to free Jim . . . hence the temporary abandonment of the story" (p. 116). This explanation is plausible only if we assume that Twain had intended to free Jim; this is certainly Jim's plan, and perhaps even the empathetic reader's, but not necessarily the plan of Mark Twain or of Huck, as retrospective narrator. They, after all, know that Jim is a free man; indeed, it could even be said that they ironically indicate this through the direction and destination of Jim's journey. {23} Moreover, the narrative prepares for the discovery of the dead man by initially establishing Pap's identity as the novel's most militant racist and then providing clues that intimate that the murder may have a racial dimension to it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mark Twain section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mark Twain essays

  1. Compare and contrast - Huckleberry Finn (Huck) and Tom Sawyer.

    Then after their raft is destroyed a stern-wheeler and Huck and Jim are separated, Huck is taken by a wealthy southern family and witnesses them being slaughtered by the family they were feuding. Huck then finds out that the family that took him in found Jim and so he and Jim continue their journey.

  2. Many critics have made attempts to discredit "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" by pointing ...

    While this is harmless fun, the realistic Huck argues with his own conscience: "So then I judged that all that stuff was only just one of Tom Sawyer's lies I reckoned he believed in the A-rabs and the Elephants, but as for me I think different.

  1. The runaway slave named Jim teaches an ignorant and innocent white boy named Huck ...

    Page 49 "Jim, this is nice," I says. "I wouldn't want to be nowhere else but here. Pass me along another hunk of fish and some hot corn-bread." "Well you wouldn't 'a' ben here 'f it hadn't 'a' ben for Jim.

  2. 'Treasure Island is a 'rites of passage' novel that tells of Jim Hawkins' spiritual ...

    The writer writes of Jim's admiration of the Captain in a very subtle way, as an indication to its lesser significance to the novel. Far more does Jim look up to Dr Livesey; Jim is full of admiration for the heroics in the face of Billy Bones.

  1. Mark Twain uses the plot of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to reveal the ...

    One critic elaborates, "The novel's semiliterate narrator, vernacular dialogue, forthright depiction of the hypocrisy and brutality of American life, and unrefined frontier humor were sufficiently radical at the time of its publication to warrant the novel's banishment from numerous libraries as 'the veriest trash'" (19:349).

  2. Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn

    Luckily Jim and Huck join forces again after Jim tells a Shepardson family slave to let Huck know where he can meet back up with him. Huck wastes no time getting out of this place once he gets the good news, and before you know it Jim and Huck are back on the mighty Mississippi.

  1. Themes are the fundamental and often universal ideas explored in a literary work - ...

    His moral development is sharply contrasted to the character of Tom Sawyer, who is influenced by a bizarre mix of adventure novels and Sunday-school teachings, which he combines to justify his outrageous and potentially harmful escapades. The Hypocrisy of "Civilized" Society When Huck plans to head west at the end

  2. Literary analysis of "Huckleberry Finn" and "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer"

    The Wilks incident was when the Duke and Dauphin plan to rob three girls of their money that they inherited after the recent death of their father. The Duke and Dauphin pretend to be the girls? uncles from England while playing with the girls? emotions just to gain their inheritance

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work