Describe the nature of the trenches. Explain why it was an effective method of defence.
20th October 2004 Yr.10 Essay
Describe the nature of the trenches. Explain why it was an effective method of defence.
Trenches were first introduced during World War 1, the sole purpose of the trenches being, a strong method of defence. When both armies of equal strength met, deadlock/ stalemate occurred (end of 1914). The war of movement ended, this resulted in soldiers in digging holes, roughly 3metres in height and 1.5metres wide, known as trenches, for protection along the front line. Soldiers built trenches because men wanted to find shelter from the weight and firepower of modern arms and artillery, as underground was the best hope of survival. This was the introduction of the first trenches during the stalemate, towards the end of 1914.
Trench systems, though initially made for the purpose of where men stood whilst the fighting died away, became more complex. The original trenches were developed to a point where trench system became a strong method of defence during the war. Trenches became deeper, front line trenches were upwards of roughly six feet deep, duckboards or strips of wood were used as flooring, a firestep for sentries and the soldiers on the forward facing wall for when they were repelling an attack, in the rear wall there were dugouts for men to rest or shelter from artillery bombs. Sandbags were piled on the front edge of the trenches to make the trench deeper and to form parapets with loopholes which the soldiers could fire through, and coils of barbed wire reaching 15metres in font of the trenches prevented the enemy to break through. The first line, the second line and the reverse lines were usually the main lines of trenches on either side, with communication trenches connecting the rear areas with the front line. Trenches were in a zig-zag pattern to prevent the enemy from taking a whole section of the opposition with their fire. To the front was an area named “No Mans Land”, which was the area between both armies’ sides. Both sides fought to gain ground of “No Mans land”.