• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different representations of trench warfare in World War One.

Extracts from this document...


History Notes on Q2: - The Museum at Notre Dame de Lorette and Source E (a novel written in the 1970's by an Australian author - David Malouf) both show different representations of trench warfare in World War One. The Museum at Notre Dame de Lorette focuses on the day-to-day life on the soldiers. It shows that life did not only contain fighting, but also soldiers resting and socialising whilst playing cards, smoking or planning future attacks. The display does show signs of causalities by the First Aid Post and a soldier being operated on. This implies that there was always help available and that the soldiers were looked after in all cases. ...read more.


The museum can only show the war with available sources and artefacts. Hence, the impression will be with the positive feature of the war. The cemetry next to the museum shows the mass deaths, whilst the museum shows more information on the subject. As a French museum, it is likely to be visited by people that have lost relatives in the war. These people would not want to be reminded of the bad, horrific points of the war. They would prefer to believe that their loved one's experienced moments of companionship and care. Source E emphasises on the horrific aspects of World War One. It shows details of death and the living alongside rats and lice. ...read more.


Also, Australians were in World War One, but they know little about the actual events and happenings in the war. It may have been written for the Australians to provide them with a wider knowledge of the war, but mainly focusing on the mass killing. I believe that certain aspects of both the museum and Source E are reliable and accurate. The novel has been written to sell, but includes many details and aspects of the war that are similar and relate to other sources; for example, the dirty and muddy conditions agree with the trenches at the museum (See Question One). The museum itself is privately owned and acts as a service to people wanting to find out more about the war and the conditions; and it also uses original artefacts. Overall, the two sources together show clearly what trench warfare was like during World War One. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. History - World War One

    As a result, men joined the army in large numbers. Also like the White Feather method people also sent abusive letters to people who had not joined the army..... A taunting letter forwarded to a railway porter who had not yet enlisted...

  2. Did the Soldiers Themselves, Give a more Accurate Picture of Trench Life than Official ...

    in B4, there were times or places in the trenches that men had cleaner clothes and better food. Source B3 could be used in conjunction with B6 to help us further understand what the food situation was like in the war.

  1. World War One Trench Warfare Sources Questions

    I think that source D is not reliable enough to say whether or not is has proved sources A and B were successful. The photo may show a lot of people outside a police station, but there is not indication to say what is going on.

  2. History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

    figures already mentioned above, help to prove more or less that source D, whatever its providence, (which is not at all clear) generally recruitment posters were fairly effective, the most famous being left out, Kitchner's finger insisting that "THE COUNTRY NEEDS YOU."

  1. Why was Trench Warfare so terrible

    The German army produced a 'saw-back' blade that, as its name suggests, gave the appearance of a saw with its double row of teeth on the back edge. Produced chiefly for use by engineering units for specific tasks, the saw-back blade proved a blessing for Allied propaganda purposes.

  2. How and why do National Cemetery/Memorials built in the 1920's commemorate those who died ...

    However in the main French cemetery there are 4 mass graves each with about 5000 unknown soldiers in each grave. This means that overall there were 20000 unknown soldiers in Notre Dame de Lorette. The layout of both sides of cemeteries was very orderly and often there were row upon row of headstones.

  1. Why was World War One the first and last major war to be characterised ...

    But the English had to keep the ports open at all costs so that troops, supplies and equipment could still be sent to aid in the fight against the Germans. The British had to dig in and stop the Germans in their tracks.

  2. The Western Front and Trench Warfare in World War 1

    that maybe it was the na�ve plans of the British army leaders were to blame rather than the armies themselves. Here is a source which shows how the trench system worked: In August1914 Lord Kitchener began recruiting for a new army. Various posters were put up and speeches were made.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work