• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Digging Analysis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ravi Aggarwal GCSE English Coursework Digging Analysis I will approach this piece of coursework by first analysing both poems separately and then talking about their similarities and differences at the end. The two poems have similar themes in that they are both about the poet's memories of their ancestors. They are both about how the poets deal with their feelings by writing a poem. The poem is about a man who has grown up on a farm in which his ancestors have always worked digging for potatoes. The man in the poem feels guilty because he feels that he is letting his predecessors down because he has found a talent in writing. He feels that he does not want to dig for a living. The poem starts in the present tense. In the first line you find out that the poem is personal because of the word "my". The unusual simile "The squat pen rests, snug as a gun" is odd because guns are not thought of as snug or cosy so perhaps he is showing that the pen is like his weapon and can be very powerful or effective in some way. In the second stanza the man hears a sound from "under his window." The poet uses onomatopoeia to describe the sound, which gives us a sense of hearing and being able to imagine the "rasping" sound. There is also alliteration with "spade sinks" and "gravely ground." The persona knows what the "rasping" sound is without even looking down, probably because he has got used to hearing it over the years. This is because sound is shown to trigger off memories in this poem. The third stanza begins with the reader being told what the noise was. It says that the father is working on the flowerbeds, which implies that the father is quite old because he only digs up flowers now and does not dig for potatoes anymore. ...read more.

Middle

The poem starts unusually because the title of the poem seems to be part of the first line and you read straight from the title onto the first line. The title is in the past tense which implies that 'he' is probably dead now and that the poem is about memories. The first line has two colours in it, "brown" and "green". These two colours are the colours of the countryside. They are describing the man so it could be saying that he is part of the landscape with the colours. The man could be brown because he could be tanned from being outside all the time or maybe because of his age and that he is getting on. His "green thumb" is like a metaphor when you have green fingers you are interested in gardening. In the second line the poet is rekindling memories of this old man mainly by remembering the sounds like "screak", which is very similar to Digging. This unusual word is probably a portmanteau and probably a mixture of screech and creak to describe the sound of his spade. There use of alliteration "chug, choke" describes to us the sound of the setting of the poem which we can guess to be an industrial setting because of the sounds. It describes the sound of the fertilizer cart as a "high madrigal wheeze" which are old Tudor songs, which were made up and were played with lots of notes together. You can tell that the poet is a child at this point because he is up in the tree looking down on the old man. The word "dumb" is a contrast between the noise of the rest of the stanza and dumb means silent because the man spoke very little. The old man is probably an old relative of the poet because it says that the poet could hear the old man "all of my childhood long." ...read more.

Conclusion

He Was is about the poet trying to remember and understand someone who is now dead but who used to be very close to the poet when he was a child. There are also some similarities in themes because both poets feel guilty and are trying to heal themselves through writing the poem like therapy. Digging is set in Ireland, which is a much poorer country than the USA where He Was is set. The work in Ireland is much harder and is very physical. This is a stark contrast to the USA, which has very fertile ground with an ideal climate to grow crops. They also have machines so it is not as hard working on the fields. This difference in the settings also matches the difference in the language of the two. Digging has more straightforward and plain language than He Was, which has richer language with more metaphors and imagery. There are also several similarities between the two poems. They are both remembering agricultural family members who were both old men. They are retrospective in that they both look back to the past and think about their memories of the two old men. Both poets seem to want to belong to their respective family with Heaney feeling left out because he does not dig potatoes and Wilbur feeling guilty that he did not once try to engage in conversation with the old man. Both poems use onomatopoeia and alliteration to great effect describing the sounds and smells which trigger the memories. They are both personal and about the poets own lives so they are autobiographical. I prefer the Heaney poem because the poet is trying to make you think about your own life and whether you have problems like this in your life like not living up to your parents' expectations. Heaney gets you to think about what you want to do next in your life so it is a good poem for young people who still have the rest of their lives ahead of them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Seamus Heaney section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Seamus Heaney essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Follower is a poem written by the renowned poet Seamus Heaney. The poem relates ...

    4 star(s)

    This leaves us the impression that Heaney no longer wanted to become a farmer and thus let his father down. Even though Heaney and his father had what seemed and inseparable father to son relationship, the word "love" is never used in the poem, although it is obvious the word

  2. Peer reviewed

    Analyse how Seamus Heaney uses language to convey his childhood experiences to the reader ...

    3 star(s)

    This is first seen in "Death of a Naturalist". In the first verse the child is fascinated by the frogs, but this changes dramatically in the 2nd verse as his views change fascination to fear and disgust. I think that the poet does this to show us that the boy is growing up.

  1. Most, if not all, of Heaney's poems in 'Wintering Out' describe Heaney's uncertainty towards ...

    Even though he cannot but help think of Ireland, he feels the need to get away from it and its troubles.

  2. Seamus Heaney.

    In 1982 he won the Bennett Award, and Queen's University in Belfast conferred on him an honorary Doctor of Letters degree. He cofounded Field Day Publishing with Brian Friel and others in 1983. Station Island, his first collection in five years, was published in 1984.

  1. Explore how Heaney writes about suffering in 'Bye-Child' and in one other poem of ...

    own child, 'till the frozen knobs of her wrists were dead as the gravel,' This shows her physical pain, numbed by the coldness of the water and highlights the despair she feels. 'He was a minnow with hooks tearing her open', this is a reflection of the mother's emotional pain,

  2. Digging languageThe poem starts in the present tense. In the first line you find ...

    The word "digging" pops us again at the end of the third stanza as it is at the end of the second. The word seems to haunt or irritate the poet because he feels he is letting down his ancestors.

  1. Follower is a poem about the poets love and admiration for his father. It ...

    It is as though at this moment the boy has become aware of himself. He wants to be like his father but thinks of himself as clumsy and a "nuisance". His fathers strength and power are also very effectively brought out in the simply, but effective simile, 'His shoulders globed

  2. The Tollund Man

    Later in the poem Heaney says that 'The Tollund Man', 'rode the tumbril' which was a cart that took people to their death by punishment for example the guillotine, this also backs up the idea that 'The Tollund Man' was killed in rather gruesome circumstances.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work