• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'. Marcus Brutus is a central character within the play; playing an essential role in the assassination of Julius Caesar. He is immediately portrayed as a loyal servant and close friend to Caesar creating a sense of irony in his role as conspirator. Brutus is complex, because he does not kill Caesar for greed, envy nor to preserve his social position like so many of the other conspirators against Caesar. This Brutus reinforces within his speech in Act III, Scene II, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" thus, explaining his actions as being for the good of Rome. Due to this, the character of Brutus has caused a lot of controversy as to whether he was a hero or villain, Does assassinating a leader for the good of the people constitute bravery worthy of a tragic hero or can the end never justify the means? This early demonstration of Brutus' relationship to Caesar, his involvement in the conspiracy and his importance to the plot immediately engages the audience in the action and with his powerful soliloquies, the audience gains insight into the complexities of his motives. He is a powerful public figure, but he appears also as a husband, a master to his servants, a dignified military leader, and a loving friend. ...read more.


a clever technique used by Cassius in a further attempt to recruit Brutus towards the conspiracy. Throughout their relationship as companions and later brothers in arms Cassius has continually acted as a foil to Brutus. Shakespeare's demonstration of Brutus shows determination and strength excelled by Cassius; however it also reveals he lacks practicality by failing to assess consequences. He is an idealistic man, motivated by nobility and principles with his rigid idealism being both his greatest virtue and his most deadly flaw. His commitment to principle leads him to make miscalculations; wanting to avoid violence he ignores Cassius' suggestion that the conspirators kill Anthony as well as Caesar. "For Antony is but a limb of Caesar: Let us be sacrificers, but not butchers." His ignorance being an attempt to curtail violence, proving however to be a huge mistake. A further example of his commitment to principle and a moment of na�ve idealism illustrates Brutus again ignoring the advice of Cassius and allowing Antony to speak a funeral oration over Caesar's body. "You know not what you do: do not consent That Antony speak in his funeral: Know you how much the people may be moved by that which he will utter?" advice demonstrating Cassius' practicality as a leader, in comparison to Brutus' na�ve and idealistic views. As a result of this action however, Brutus forfeits the authority of having the last word on the murder, thus allowing Antony to incite the Roman populace unto rioting against him and his fellow conspirators. ...read more.


He is generous and caring, overall proving himself to be an honest and noble citizen. His honesty as a character is portrayed in act 4 scene III whereby he refuses to take bribes; "I can raise no money by vile means." This suggests that he does not want to resort to corrupt means in order to acquire money, again proving his nobleness and rigid idealism. This however is highly ironic and hypocritical as he is willing to take money from Cassius that has been raised due to vile means. Again proving his philosophical values are not always completely long lived. The character of Brutus Is extremely noble and dignified, this is proven when Brutus dies by suicide, a hugely noble deed in the roman era, Mark Antony describes his bitter enemy by saying, " this was the noblest roman of them all....this was a man." Mark Antony recognizes with these words that Brutus acted from a sense of civic duty, not malice nor greed nor envy, unlike the other conspirators. He realizes Brutus is not a thoughtless butcher and shows immense respect for him. In conclusion I feel that the Shakespeare portrays the character of Brutus as a powerful public figure, appearing as both a loving husband, master to his servants, dignified military leader, and a loving friend. He is extremely noble and although sometimes lacks the ability to correctly assess situations; following principle rather than military strategics, he is proven to be a very respectful and dignified Roman, dedicated to his country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Julius Caesar essays

  1. Why is Mark Antony's Speech so Effective in Persuading his Audience?

    , which questions the conspirators ability to lead. Antony then teases the crowd with Caesar's will, which the beg him to read, but he refuses. This make him out to be an honest and principled man and he tells the crowd to "have patience" and expresses his feeling that he

  2. to what extent is brutus the real tragic hero of the play?

    to her because he cares of Portia and he does not want to give a heavy burden to her. 'I'm not well in health, and that is all.' This moment shows that they have strong and close relationship between them as Portia knows her husband very well and she does self-harming to show him her strength.

  1. Marc Antony 'Machiavellian schemer'

    in turn making them feel guilty. He is crafty and sly, but he speaks with conviction and that sways the masses to his side. Once the crowd is passionately fired up and Antony has recklessly unleashed the "dogs of war" over Rome, he fuels them further, and then states deviously,

  2. Was Brutus right?

    I think the people would have been shocked and saddened by what happened to their favourite. They would realise that the country was now going to be put in a 'civil war' situation, which could only be bad for ordinary Romans.

  1. How Effective Are Brutus And Antony In Gaining The Support Of The Roman Citizens ...

    This explains what might have happened if Caesar had stayed in control and is the first of several effective rhetorical questions intended to pursuade. Repetition is also used for reinforcement, as is the posing of questions: "If any speak; for him have I offended.

  2. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the conspirators are used by Shakespeare in highlighting ...

    Cassius being the more experienced tactician and soldier and 'abler...to make conditions' is continually overruled by Brutus. His regards Antony as a 'shrewd contriver' and suggestion that they should 'let Antony and Caesar fall together' is overruled by Brutus. Because Brutus does not see the potential danger within Antony, he claims 'for Antony is but a limb of Caesar'.

  1. Julius Caesar

    They, of course are fighting for Rome at this point, so we see nobility in Brutus for both his country and his lost close friend Cassius. To summarise, Shakespeare has indubitably and most certainly conveyed the immensely importance of being "noble" and "honourable" in the play.

  2. Cassius' Persuasion Of Brutus

    This argument focuses on Cassius' own bitterness at being inferior to Caesar in his rank and this does not seem to be a very persuasive argument to persuade Brutus, as he is so noble and honourable. Cassius develops upon this story as he tells us how Caesar was once feverish

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work