• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discussing Hamlet.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hamlet coursework By Kieran Teeluck 12MS At various times, Shakespeare has been seen by critics as presenting Hamlet as a sensitive poet, unable to endure the cruel pressures of the world, a man driven by sexual desire for his mother, and a representative to a corrupt political regime. Which would be your interpretation and why? The character of Hamlet can simply be described as he who "embodies all that man represents in earth"- as 'Toril Moi' so eloquently points out. My interpretation, like Toril's, is that simplicity is an element that lacks in tremendous proportions in Hamlet; he is a complex and three-dimensional character to an infinite extent. So much so, his complexity allows him to assume an 'antic-disposition' and also appear truly insane at the same time. It is evident that Shakespeare adopted the 'Senecan' classical revenge tragedy style of plot, which clearly sets out the characteristics of Hamlet: As the son of the dead king/father, it was obligatory to avenge his father's death, however hindering this act is the hero's hesitation, which one could describe as Hamlet's cowardice. Eventually, Hamlet killing Claudius fulfils the revenge tragedy. Hamlet is therefore a revenge tragedy in plot, but not in central character. In my opinion, it is more intriguing to use the vengeance theme as a carrier to express the unimaginable depth of emotion contained in Hamlet. This emotion is caused by human experience of dealing with death, pursuing revenge, inaction, action, failure in love, and finally the oppressive affect on man (Hamlet) by a nation of corrupt power. Hamlet is a dexterous courtier and scholar, yet in times of extreme pressure he averts from his calm-courtier ways and behaves erratically, leading to fatal ends, such as the unnecessary killing of Polonius. The genuine despair of Hamlet limits his capacity for action and increases his self-abasement and self-disgust, constantly questioning the value and purpose of his life- hence being unable to endure the cruel pressures of the world. ...read more.

Middle

Hamlet had every reason to be afraid of the ghost, yet he was brave! Hamlet is very intelligent, having studied at Wittenberg university, where his great ability to think was born. It seems that his intelligence, and character flaw combined produces his ability to organise the "mouse-trap", to catch the "king's conscience". The intelligence segment can be seen in his organisation skills of the play, and also in his keen knowledge of theatre: "the rugged Pyrrhus, like th' Hyrcanian beast...With eyes like Carbuncles" says Hamlet with "good accent and discretion". I believe the "mouse-trap" is a mere result of Hamlet's character flaw- a delay tactic. One may claim that the "mouse-trap" is decisive action on Hamlet's part, that he does it to ensure the veracity of what the ghost explained. However, I feel that Hamlet still speculates far too much, like he speculated before on the "course of nature" and his "one defect", he speculates now on his father, that he may be the "devil". Hamlet uses the "devil" issue as an excuse to delay, because although ghosts were seen as evil, the dead king seems honest. For instance, he gives a true, loving account of Gertrude: "radiant angel...in a celestial bed", which corresponds to their ideal marriage: "he who was so loving to her.... she hang upon him". It can therefore be said that everything Hamlet enacts must be in the interest of moral justification, thus finding resolve to act. How can we believe that Hamlet will find resolve to act, especially in considering his contradictory nature: "I'll wipe away all trivial fond records, All saws of books, all forms...." promises Hamlet, that he will never turn to education again, instead the ghost's "commandment all alone shall live within the book and volume of" his brain. However, the next thing Hamlet does is turn to education by "writing" down his resolve, which is what he previously said he'd never do- He is contradicting himself. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, it is too late for Gertrude as she soon perishes to her death at the hands of corruption: "the drink...I am poison'd". The character of Laertes also falls victim to Claudius' scheming ways, in being in a heightened state of anger (over his father's death and his sister's madness), accepting Claudius' sly persuasiveness: "Our life...all that is ours", finally agreeing that he should enact Claudius' plotting to "let the axe" on Hamlet "fall". Infact, Hamlet represents what Laertes is not, but unfortunately, like Gertrude, it is too late for Hamlet. Hamlet's speculative nature into the abuses of power in a corrupt political regime finally pays off, as Hamlet cuts out the "poison" in Denmark by killing Claudius, as Rosencrantz and Guildernstern find out by paying a dearer price than they bargained for! In conclusion, the character of Hamlet is so complex that even we, the audience, are unable to interpret whether Hamlet's "antic-disposition" is consistent, or in times of great passion, real madness is possessed by Hamlet - For example in the closet scene and when he jumps onto Ophelia's coffin. The play shows an insight into the political system of queen Elizabeth, and of its abuse and misconduct of power. Hamlet employs a fake madness to avoid corruption in the way he manipulates others to deliver justice - making him adverse to the corrupt political regime. At the heart of the play is the battle between Claudius and Hamlet, and how their relationship affects other characters and the plot, e.g. Affects his mum and Ophelia, both of whom Hamlet resents. The sensitive poet hamlet can be seen in the first half of the play, whose soliloquies of striking, ironic images show a 'suicidal' Hamlet; one incapable of action, in an oppressive Denmark, which is the cause of his inability to endure the cruel pressures of the world. Hamlet's emotions and morals are punished by a callous, mechanical, and corrupt system, and as 'Goethe' so rightly says, Hamlet has "a lovely pure and most moral nature, without the strength of nerve which forms a hero". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hamlet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explore the "loving mother-son" relationship between Gertrude and Hamlet, with focus on language.

    4 star(s)

    I think that Shakespeare did not purposefully intend any Oedipus interpretation of this scene when he wrote the play, as this kind of psychological reading would not have been known in the seventeenth century. Even though Hamlet lashes out at her with all the rage he can muster, Gertrude remains faithful to him, protecting him from the King by lying.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Through its portrayal of human experience, Shakespeares Hamlet reinforces the significance of loyalty. To ...

    3 star(s)

    Hamlet's tremendous grief is intensified by this lack of feeling by those around him, and more significantly, by the cold-hearted actions of his mother, who married her brother-in-law within a month of her husband's death. This act of treachery by Gertrude, whom Hamlet obviously loved greatly at one time, rips

  1. Appearance vs. Reality in Hamlet.

    He gets so caught up in his emotions and plans that he doesn't realize the reason for Laertes rage. He only later realizes why Laertes is so upset. He puts blame of Polonius' murder on his madness when he says, "If Hamlet from himself be ta'en away, and when he's

  2. The Dramatic Function of Ophelia in Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'.

    This shows how a holy face can be put on something to cover evil deeds. The expressions of love may appear truthful to Ophelia, who speaks of Hamlet's 'affection' for her, but (if Polonius and Laertes are to be believed)

  1. Compare and Contrast theCharacters Hamlet and Laertes.

    Hamlet here has proven to be the better character as he accepts Laertes' apology and forgives him. In his anger and rage Hamlet leaps up and goes straight up to Claudius and puts an end to Claudius' reign once and for all.

  2. How do the themes of Hamlet relate to modern life?

    In our modern life, we see women and men equally capable; However, women in Hamlet show weaknesses and are referred as inferior beings that work as by-standards. A second reason why Hamlet is not universal is because Shakespeare based Hamlet on revenge.

  1. Scene by Scene - Hamlet.

    Francisco remarks, "It's bitter cold... and I am sick at heart." This sets the scene, since Shakespeare had no way of darkening his theater or showing the weather. The fact that each guard suspects the other of being an intruder indicates all is not well, even though Francisco does not say why he is "sick at heart".

  2. Critical review of 'Hamlet'

    From evidence that Hamlet is suicidal one might conclude that he is mad. I do not think evaluating his scenario and thinking how much simpler it would be if he were to die can be conceived as mad. Many people do it and it is a feeling that you cannot help.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work