• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Discussion of Discourse in Nabokov's Lolita

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB Extended Essay English A1 How does the discourse between Humbert Humbert's authorial strategy as the first person narrator of 'Lolita' and Vladimir Nabokov's own strategy as the book's author affect our reading of the text? Candidate Name: Natasha Frost Candidate Session Number: 000434-033 School: Kristin School 000434 Supervisor: Mrs. Meryl Noyes Word Count: 3,994 Abstract This essay explores the relationship between authorial strategy and the strategy and defence of the narrator within the book Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. It also considers how the discourse between these two elements affects the reader's perception of the narrator and our judgment of his crimes, coming to the conclusion that we must consider the bare facts presented by Nabokov and prevent ourselves from becoming swayed by Humbert's rhetoric and powerful aesthetics. It considers this in light of the views of previous readers in order to understand how Humbert's manipulation can at times be successful. The essay investigates in some depth the notion of Nabokov's description of events and the subtle tools he uses that undermine the story we are told by Humbert Humbert. It considers the psychological tools Humbert uses to inspire pathos and understanding and the nuances to his character that make him considered 'reputable', such as his scholarship and seductive use of language, making reference to psychodynamics and aesthetic theory. In addition to considering the manner in which Humbert manipulates the reader, the essay also articulates, with reference to chess, his efforts to manipulate characters, the way in which they are perceived and the way in which his failed attempts at control affect his strategy and our understanding of him as a character. By exploring his relationship with other characters, we gain a better understanding of his manipulation techniques. The essay finally inspects Humbert's relationship with Quilty and the purpose of attempting to minimise their parallels, while considering those drawn between the scene at the Enchanted Hunters and Pavor Manor. ...read more.

Middle

Can we ever really separate the two? Humbert's language and images are by nature beautiful and by confusing the notion of paedophilia with the aesthetics of Lolita, our clearest moral obligations become hazy. Though within this theory, beauty is designed only 'to be', Humbert uses it as a tool for disguising ugliness and anaesthetising reality for his own morally reprehensible ends. By presenting himself as the tortured artist, driven half-mad with desire that the ordinary cannot understand, we begin to sympathise with Humbert and, in turn, find ourselves emphasising with his seemingly unjustifiable actions. So effective is Nabokov's strategy of presenting us with a split dichotomy that we can justify the molesting of a fourteen year old on the grounds of turn of phrase, for once we can accept his actions with our aesthetic judgement, our moral and legal judgement of him begins to waver. When imploring us to judge him in a legal and moral sense, Humbert's defence is to appear not to be defending himself at all, as Brian Boyd suggests21. He is a 'monster'22 and a 'maniac'23, guilty of all his crimes - we are invited to condemn him and to hate him. Nonetheless, for all his self-flagellation, he notes to the reader that he had, at very least, attempted to control his shameful sexual nature: rather than taking Lolita as he wishes and is able to, he merely grinds himself against her, bringing himself to bliss that is ignorant at least on her part. Similarly, at the Enchanted Hunters, he considers subduing her prior to simply raping: though this could not be considered moral, he nonetheless externalises a desire for her to retain some innocence. This ultimately creates an oxymoron, for we see that Humbert objectifies her and uses her as a sexual tool, yet at the same time claims to desire that she be left unmarred: how can we resolve this fundamental contradiction in terms? ...read more.

Conclusion

By presenting Quilty and Lolita succeeding in escaping Humbert's control, Nabokov turns to the reader and asks: 'He's positioned you as he likes, will you move as he wants you to?' We bid adieu to a remorseful, rhetorical Humbert, on a high slope in the mountains. This scene, poignant and pointed, becomes the closing note of the novel: Humbert listening to the cries of schoolchildren at play, knowing that 'the hopelessly poignant thing was not Lolita's absence from my side, but the absence of her voice from that concord.'39 This moment of epiphany and moral inversion seems to indicate that, despite the moments of calculating cruelty and wanton exploitation, Humbert Humbert, fastidious, depraved scholar, has seen the error of his ways. This could almost convince us to be merciful in our judgement of Humbert. However, this last note is an intensely calculated one: designed to inspire pathos and respect, it leaves a final impression of Humbert's concern and love for Lolita. Though the end of the text, this is not the end of the story but rather takes place two years prior to the murder of Quilty. Chronologically, Humbert leaves us in a manic and murderous mood, neither as poignant nor as regretful as he might appear from his closing words. Conclusion Humbert's crime is not exclusively the rape of a little girl but the attempt to cruelly control those around him. His rhetorical strategy of appearing remorseful and philosophical may be convincing, but ultimately, Nabokov's evidence filters through and, though our feelings may be manipulated and our perceptions altered, we see a truer clearer sense of judgement, inscribed between the narrator's words, that comes through as the real strategy and plot against Humbert's defence tactics. Humbert's nature is barbaric and inexcusable, yet his many tools and techniques leave us questioning our own morals. By exploring his tools, techniques and own manipulation, we see that the discourse between Humbert's strategy and Nabokov's facts serve both to titillate, challenge and ultimately help us to find truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Authors section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Authors essays

  1. Handmaid Tale by Margret Atwood

    ), Offred answer opens Ofglen more and they both admit that they are not believers of this society. Offred also learns there is a underground society that Ofglen is involved in. as both of handmaids walk back to their houses glad they opened up to each other, a black

  2. The treatment of race in Toni Morrison's "Recitatif"

    Because her hair was big and wild like Afro it might suggest that she was African-American. Nevertheless, at the time this episode takes place, that is 1960s/1970s, the Afro was as popular hairstyle among the blacks as among the whites.

  1. Consider Frayn's presentation of Mrs.Hayward

    In chapter five, Mrs. Hayward's character is further investigated when she visits Stephen in the den, noting that she has to speak to Stephen when she realises they are spying on her that she has to. Mrs Hayward is polite and formal, asking permission to enter the den, "Stephen...may I come in?"

  2. The Sound and the Fury. Faulkners application of certain diction for Benjy, Quentin ...

    past with Caddy involved, even after she got married and no longer lived in the Compson family house.

  1. "'We Need to Talk About Kevin' presents us with unsympathetic characters who nevertheless attract ...

    It was possible to be a good dad, to put in the weekends and the picnics and the bedtime stories, and so to raise a decent, stalwart son. This was America. And you had done everything right", as Eva imagines Franklin thinking just before he was shot - the language

  2. Brief Encounter and Falling in Love - a story simplified and continued.

    In Brief Encounter nothing of that kind happens. Alec goes away and Laura returns home like every Thursday. No one ever finds out about his or her 'affair' and it is over anyway. There is not even a hint that they might ever see each other again in the future.

  1. There is always another side, always(TM) How does Jean Rhys demonstrate her understanding of ...

    However, by doing this Rhys creates the awareness in the reader of marginalised voices experienced not only by her own characters but also by herself who recognises and sympathises with other voices like hers; distant and unrecognised for a very long time, until it was too late.

  2. Lamb to the Slaughter Essay

    into Jack Noonan?s arms, weeping hysterically.? This suggests that she did not love Patrick and was simply acting because she was concerned for herself and her unborn child. She is very smart doing this because it makes the detective feel sorry for her especially since they know Patrick.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work